From patchwork Wed Dec 6 11:17:50 2023 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Johan Hovold X-Patchwork-Id: 13481572 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 565B031725; Wed, 6 Dec 2023 11:17:42 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="LY0HV7/s" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id E5383C433C8; Wed, 6 Dec 2023 11:17:41 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1701861462; bh=7eln7pxVEETenxeXywIjzoP1QmPs7ZhmHa7giWC3B/U=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:From; b=LY0HV7/sC/KjLK8Cnp653pOgtidr/XJBquqaMW8yCQw0Dyz/Yyqgw9Dunh0JLHNFp IWfE9LkVpBMOZJ+ub4e6F08Mqm+ARrb5D72WIuSlLKdh2zNUfNPZel7hGIBew2NXQg 40ZN40UOVnPwxlsmabo9ci3qz9o1vcczK7uIRDtFWO8097ivzPrQw5s1KXH7u+ot4P uTKSEX8yfOIrSm43HBXQEQCSpUObj4b2gt/OSdxog7UwJtMv2pj2hokkBQHFuw7FAi aFCHAsX31d1mzCAGyvFg0i8J27bX4MJ6vXwOeaU6hNaqbSEA/ydcJ4iJ/HWYuT1k+q vquv1ZFZksoUQ== Received: from johan by xi.lan with local (Exim 4.96.2) (envelope-from ) id 1rApvA-0001wC-14; Wed, 06 Dec 2023 12:18:28 +0100 From: Johan Hovold To: Lee Jones Cc: Mauro Carvalho Chehab , Rob Herring , Krzysztof Kozlowski , Conor Dooley , Andy Gross , Bjorn Andersson , Konrad Dybcio , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, Johan Hovold Subject: [PATCH v3 0/4] dt-bindings: mfd: fix up PMIC examples Date: Wed, 6 Dec 2023 12:17:50 +0100 Message-ID: <20231206111754.7410-1-johan+linaro@kernel.org> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.41.0 Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 When reviewing the various SPMI PMIC bindings, I noticed that several examples were incorrect and misleading and could also use some cleanup. This series addresses the mfd ones along with some related issues. [ The PM8008 actually sits on an i2c bus but it is related to the other Qualcomm SPMI PMICs. ] Johan Changes in v3 - rebase pm8008 update on linux-next to avoid a trivial conflict due to a local change in my tree Changes in v2 - drop the incorrect #address-cells and #size-cells properties also from the hi6421 regulator binding (Rob) - drop Fixes tag from pm8008 cleanup Johan Hovold (4): dt-bindings: mfd: hisilicon,hi6421-spmi-pmic: fix up binding reference dt-bindings: mfd: hisilicon,hi6421-spmi-pmic: fix regulator binding dt-bindings: mfd: hisilicon,hi6421-spmi-pmic: clean up example dt-bindings: mfd: pm8008: clean up example node names .../mfd/hisilicon,hi6421-spmi-pmic.yaml | 140 +++++++++--------- .../devicetree/bindings/mfd/qcom,pm8008.yaml | 6 +- 2 files changed, 72 insertions(+), 74 deletions(-)