Message ID | 20250325123019.597976-1-prashanth.k@oss.qualcomm.com (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
Headers | show |
Series | Add snps,dis_u3_susphy_quirk for some QC targets | expand |
On 3/25/25 1:30 PM, Prashanth K wrote: > During device mode initialization on certain QC targets, before the > runstop bit is set, sometimes it's observed that the GEVNTADR{LO/HI} > register write fails. As a result, GEVTADDR registers are still 0x0. > Upon setting runstop bit, DWC3 controller attempts to write the new > events to address 0x0, causing an SMMU fault and system crash. More > info about the crash at [1]. > > This was initially observed on SM8450 and later reported on few > other targets as well. As suggested by Qualcomm HW team, clearing > the GUSB3PIPECTL.SUSPHY bit resolves the issue by preventing register > write failures. Address this by setting the snps,dis_u3_susphy_quirk > to keep the GUSB3PIPECTL.SUSPHY bit cleared. This change was tested > on multiple targets (SM8350, SM8450 QCS615 etc.) for over an year > and hasn't exhibited any side effects. > > [1]: https://lore.kernel.org/all/fa94cbc9-e637-ba9b-8ec8-67c6955eca98@quicinc.com/ > > Prashanth K (3): > arm64: dts: qcom: sm8150: Add snps,dis_u3_susphy_quirk > arm64: dts: qcom: sm8350: Add snps,dis_u3_susphy_quirk > arm64: dts: qcom: sm8450: Add snps,dis_u3_susphy_quirk > > Pratham Pratap (2): > arm64: dts: qcom: qcs615: Add snps,dis_u3_susphy_quirk > arm64: dts: qcom: qdu1000: Add snps,dis_u3_susphy_quirk Are there more targets affected, from the list of the ones currently supported upstream? Konrad
On 25-03-25 08:11 pm, Konrad Dybcio wrote: > On 3/25/25 1:30 PM, Prashanth K wrote: >> During device mode initialization on certain QC targets, before the >> runstop bit is set, sometimes it's observed that the GEVNTADR{LO/HI} >> register write fails. As a result, GEVTADDR registers are still 0x0. >> Upon setting runstop bit, DWC3 controller attempts to write the new >> events to address 0x0, causing an SMMU fault and system crash. More >> info about the crash at [1]. >> >> This was initially observed on SM8450 and later reported on few >> other targets as well. As suggested by Qualcomm HW team, clearing >> the GUSB3PIPECTL.SUSPHY bit resolves the issue by preventing register >> write failures. Address this by setting the snps,dis_u3_susphy_quirk >> to keep the GUSB3PIPECTL.SUSPHY bit cleared. This change was tested >> on multiple targets (SM8350, SM8450 QCS615 etc.) for over an year >> and hasn't exhibited any side effects. >> >> [1]: https://lore.kernel.org/all/fa94cbc9-e637-ba9b-8ec8-67c6955eca98@quicinc.com/ >> >> Prashanth K (3): >> arm64: dts: qcom: sm8150: Add snps,dis_u3_susphy_quirk >> arm64: dts: qcom: sm8350: Add snps,dis_u3_susphy_quirk >> arm64: dts: qcom: sm8450: Add snps,dis_u3_susphy_quirk >> >> Pratham Pratap (2): >> arm64: dts: qcom: qcs615: Add snps,dis_u3_susphy_quirk >> arm64: dts: qcom: qdu1000: Add snps,dis_u3_susphy_quirk > > Are there more targets affected, from the list of the ones currently > supported upstream? > > Konrad My initial plan was to add it for all the QC platforms, but wasn't confident enough about it. Because we have seen the issue only on these targets and hence tested only on these. Regards, Prashanth K
On 3/25/25 4:01 PM, Prashanth K wrote: > > > On 25-03-25 08:11 pm, Konrad Dybcio wrote: >> On 3/25/25 1:30 PM, Prashanth K wrote: >>> During device mode initialization on certain QC targets, before the >>> runstop bit is set, sometimes it's observed that the GEVNTADR{LO/HI} >>> register write fails. As a result, GEVTADDR registers are still 0x0. >>> Upon setting runstop bit, DWC3 controller attempts to write the new >>> events to address 0x0, causing an SMMU fault and system crash. More >>> info about the crash at [1]. >>> >>> This was initially observed on SM8450 and later reported on few >>> other targets as well. As suggested by Qualcomm HW team, clearing >>> the GUSB3PIPECTL.SUSPHY bit resolves the issue by preventing register >>> write failures. Address this by setting the snps,dis_u3_susphy_quirk >>> to keep the GUSB3PIPECTL.SUSPHY bit cleared. This change was tested >>> on multiple targets (SM8350, SM8450 QCS615 etc.) for over an year >>> and hasn't exhibited any side effects. >>> >>> [1]: https://lore.kernel.org/all/fa94cbc9-e637-ba9b-8ec8-67c6955eca98@quicinc.com/ >>> >>> Prashanth K (3): >>> arm64: dts: qcom: sm8150: Add snps,dis_u3_susphy_quirk >>> arm64: dts: qcom: sm8350: Add snps,dis_u3_susphy_quirk >>> arm64: dts: qcom: sm8450: Add snps,dis_u3_susphy_quirk >>> >>> Pratham Pratap (2): >>> arm64: dts: qcom: qcs615: Add snps,dis_u3_susphy_quirk >>> arm64: dts: qcom: qdu1000: Add snps,dis_u3_susphy_quirk >> >> Are there more targets affected, from the list of the ones currently >> supported upstream? >> >> Konrad > > My initial plan was to add it for all the QC platforms, but wasn't > confident enough about it. Because we have seen the issue only on these > targets and hence tested only on these. Okay, let's proceed with these and in the meantime please query internally whether it could be applicable to others too Reviewed-by: Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@oss.qualcomm.com> Konrad
On Tue, Mar 25, 2025 at 05:31:28PM +0100, Konrad Dybcio wrote: > On 3/25/25 4:01 PM, Prashanth K wrote: > > > > > > On 25-03-25 08:11 pm, Konrad Dybcio wrote: > >> On 3/25/25 1:30 PM, Prashanth K wrote: > >>> During device mode initialization on certain QC targets, before the > >>> runstop bit is set, sometimes it's observed that the GEVNTADR{LO/HI} > >>> register write fails. As a result, GEVTADDR registers are still 0x0. > >>> Upon setting runstop bit, DWC3 controller attempts to write the new > >>> events to address 0x0, causing an SMMU fault and system crash. More > >>> info about the crash at [1]. > >>> > >>> This was initially observed on SM8450 and later reported on few > >>> other targets as well. As suggested by Qualcomm HW team, clearing > >>> the GUSB3PIPECTL.SUSPHY bit resolves the issue by preventing register > >>> write failures. Address this by setting the snps,dis_u3_susphy_quirk > >>> to keep the GUSB3PIPECTL.SUSPHY bit cleared. This change was tested > >>> on multiple targets (SM8350, SM8450 QCS615 etc.) for over an year > >>> and hasn't exhibited any side effects. > >>> > >>> [1]: https://lore.kernel.org/all/fa94cbc9-e637-ba9b-8ec8-67c6955eca98@quicinc.com/ > >>> > >>> Prashanth K (3): > >>> arm64: dts: qcom: sm8150: Add snps,dis_u3_susphy_quirk > >>> arm64: dts: qcom: sm8350: Add snps,dis_u3_susphy_quirk > >>> arm64: dts: qcom: sm8450: Add snps,dis_u3_susphy_quirk > >>> > >>> Pratham Pratap (2): > >>> arm64: dts: qcom: qcs615: Add snps,dis_u3_susphy_quirk > >>> arm64: dts: qcom: qdu1000: Add snps,dis_u3_susphy_quirk > >> > >> Are there more targets affected, from the list of the ones currently > >> supported upstream? > >> > >> Konrad > > > > My initial plan was to add it for all the QC platforms, but wasn't > > confident enough about it. Because we have seen the issue only on these > > targets and hence tested only on these. > > Okay, let's proceed with these and in the meantime please query internally > whether it could be applicable to others too > But if it applies to all qcom targets, wouldn't it make more sense to add the property in the qcom glue driver? Regards, Bjorn > Reviewed-by: Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@oss.qualcomm.com> > > Konrad
On Tue, Mar 25, 2025 at 08:31:55PM +0530, Prashanth K wrote: > > > On 25-03-25 08:11 pm, Konrad Dybcio wrote: > > On 3/25/25 1:30 PM, Prashanth K wrote: > >> During device mode initialization on certain QC targets, before the > >> runstop bit is set, sometimes it's observed that the GEVNTADR{LO/HI} > >> register write fails. As a result, GEVTADDR registers are still 0x0. > >> Upon setting runstop bit, DWC3 controller attempts to write the new > >> events to address 0x0, causing an SMMU fault and system crash. More > >> info about the crash at [1]. > >> > >> This was initially observed on SM8450 and later reported on few > >> other targets as well. As suggested by Qualcomm HW team, clearing > >> the GUSB3PIPECTL.SUSPHY bit resolves the issue by preventing register > >> write failures. Address this by setting the snps,dis_u3_susphy_quirk > >> to keep the GUSB3PIPECTL.SUSPHY bit cleared. This change was tested > >> on multiple targets (SM8350, SM8450 QCS615 etc.) for over an year > >> and hasn't exhibited any side effects. > >> > >> [1]: https://lore.kernel.org/all/fa94cbc9-e637-ba9b-8ec8-67c6955eca98@quicinc.com/ > >> > >> Prashanth K (3): > >> arm64: dts: qcom: sm8150: Add snps,dis_u3_susphy_quirk > >> arm64: dts: qcom: sm8350: Add snps,dis_u3_susphy_quirk > >> arm64: dts: qcom: sm8450: Add snps,dis_u3_susphy_quirk It is hard to belive that this quirk is to be set for SM8150, SM8350, SM8450, but not SM8250. > >> > >> Pratham Pratap (2): > >> arm64: dts: qcom: qcs615: Add snps,dis_u3_susphy_quirk > >> arm64: dts: qcom: qdu1000: Add snps,dis_u3_susphy_quirk > > > > Are there more targets affected, from the list of the ones currently > > supported upstream? > > > > Konrad > > My initial plan was to add it for all the QC platforms, but wasn't > confident enough about it. Because we have seen the issue only on these > targets and hence tested only on these. > > Regards, > Prashanth K
On 3/26/2025 5:51 AM, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote: > On Tue, Mar 25, 2025 at 08:31:55PM +0530, Prashanth K wrote: >> >> >> On 25-03-25 08:11 pm, Konrad Dybcio wrote: >>> On 3/25/25 1:30 PM, Prashanth K wrote: >>>> During device mode initialization on certain QC targets, before the >>>> runstop bit is set, sometimes it's observed that the GEVNTADR{LO/HI} >>>> register write fails. As a result, GEVTADDR registers are still 0x0. >>>> Upon setting runstop bit, DWC3 controller attempts to write the new >>>> events to address 0x0, causing an SMMU fault and system crash. More >>>> info about the crash at [1]. >>>> >>>> This was initially observed on SM8450 and later reported on few >>>> other targets as well. As suggested by Qualcomm HW team, clearing >>>> the GUSB3PIPECTL.SUSPHY bit resolves the issue by preventing register >>>> write failures. Address this by setting the snps,dis_u3_susphy_quirk >>>> to keep the GUSB3PIPECTL.SUSPHY bit cleared. This change was tested >>>> on multiple targets (SM8350, SM8450 QCS615 etc.) for over an year >>>> and hasn't exhibited any side effects. >>>> >>>> [1]: https://lore.kernel.org/all/fa94cbc9-e637-ba9b-8ec8-67c6955eca98@quicinc.com/ >>>> >>>> Prashanth K (3): >>>> arm64: dts: qcom: sm8150: Add snps,dis_u3_susphy_quirk >>>> arm64: dts: qcom: sm8350: Add snps,dis_u3_susphy_quirk >>>> arm64: dts: qcom: sm8450: Add snps,dis_u3_susphy_quirk > > It is hard to belive that this quirk is to be set for SM8150, SM8350, > SM8450, but not SM8250. > At the moment we wanted to add this quirk for targets where issue has shown up either internal to QC or at customer's end. But the issue didn't come up on SM8250/ SM8550/ SM8650 so far either from customer end or ours. Would like to update for other targets on need basis. Regards, Krishna, >>>> >>>> Pratham Pratap (2): >>>> arm64: dts: qcom: qcs615: Add snps,dis_u3_susphy_quirk >>>> arm64: dts: qcom: qdu1000: Add snps,dis_u3_susphy_quirk >>> >>> Are there more targets affected, from the list of the ones currently >>> supported upstream? >>> >>> Konrad >> >> My initial plan was to add it for all the QC platforms, but wasn't >> confident enough about it. Because we have seen the issue only on these >> targets and hence tested only on these. >> >> Regards, >> Prashanth K >
On 26-03-25 03:40 am, Bjorn Andersson wrote: > On Tue, Mar 25, 2025 at 05:31:28PM +0100, Konrad Dybcio wrote: >> On 3/25/25 4:01 PM, Prashanth K wrote: >>> >>> >>> On 25-03-25 08:11 pm, Konrad Dybcio wrote: >>>> On 3/25/25 1:30 PM, Prashanth K wrote: >>>>> During device mode initialization on certain QC targets, before the >>>>> runstop bit is set, sometimes it's observed that the GEVNTADR{LO/HI} >>>>> register write fails. As a result, GEVTADDR registers are still 0x0. >>>>> Upon setting runstop bit, DWC3 controller attempts to write the new >>>>> events to address 0x0, causing an SMMU fault and system crash. More >>>>> info about the crash at [1]. >>>>> >>>>> This was initially observed on SM8450 and later reported on few >>>>> other targets as well. As suggested by Qualcomm HW team, clearing >>>>> the GUSB3PIPECTL.SUSPHY bit resolves the issue by preventing register >>>>> write failures. Address this by setting the snps,dis_u3_susphy_quirk >>>>> to keep the GUSB3PIPECTL.SUSPHY bit cleared. This change was tested >>>>> on multiple targets (SM8350, SM8450 QCS615 etc.) for over an year >>>>> and hasn't exhibited any side effects. >>>>> >>>>> [1]: https://lore.kernel.org/all/fa94cbc9-e637-ba9b-8ec8-67c6955eca98@quicinc.com/ >>>>> >>>>> Prashanth K (3): >>>>> arm64: dts: qcom: sm8150: Add snps,dis_u3_susphy_quirk >>>>> arm64: dts: qcom: sm8350: Add snps,dis_u3_susphy_quirk >>>>> arm64: dts: qcom: sm8450: Add snps,dis_u3_susphy_quirk >>>>> >>>>> Pratham Pratap (2): >>>>> arm64: dts: qcom: qcs615: Add snps,dis_u3_susphy_quirk >>>>> arm64: dts: qcom: qdu1000: Add snps,dis_u3_susphy_quirk >>>> >>>> Are there more targets affected, from the list of the ones currently >>>> supported upstream? >>>> >>>> Konrad >>> >>> My initial plan was to add it for all the QC platforms, but wasn't >>> confident enough about it. Because we have seen the issue only on these >>> targets and hence tested only on these. >> >> Okay, let's proceed with these and in the meantime please query internally >> whether it could be applicable to others too >> > > But if it applies to all qcom targets, wouldn't it make more sense to > add the property in the qcom glue driver? Hi Bjorn, This issue was seen only on some targets 2 years back, so we only tested on those platforms. I think its better to add it to other QC targets only if we see that issue. > > Regards, > Bjorn > >> Reviewed-by: Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@oss.qualcomm.com> >> >> Konrad Thanks for the review Konrad Regards, Prashanth K
On 3/25/25 11:10 PM, Bjorn Andersson wrote: > On Tue, Mar 25, 2025 at 05:31:28PM +0100, Konrad Dybcio wrote: >> On 3/25/25 4:01 PM, Prashanth K wrote: >>> >>> >>> On 25-03-25 08:11 pm, Konrad Dybcio wrote: >>>> On 3/25/25 1:30 PM, Prashanth K wrote: >>>>> During device mode initialization on certain QC targets, before the >>>>> runstop bit is set, sometimes it's observed that the GEVNTADR{LO/HI} >>>>> register write fails. As a result, GEVTADDR registers are still 0x0. >>>>> Upon setting runstop bit, DWC3 controller attempts to write the new >>>>> events to address 0x0, causing an SMMU fault and system crash. More >>>>> info about the crash at [1]. >>>>> >>>>> This was initially observed on SM8450 and later reported on few >>>>> other targets as well. As suggested by Qualcomm HW team, clearing >>>>> the GUSB3PIPECTL.SUSPHY bit resolves the issue by preventing register >>>>> write failures. Address this by setting the snps,dis_u3_susphy_quirk >>>>> to keep the GUSB3PIPECTL.SUSPHY bit cleared. This change was tested >>>>> on multiple targets (SM8350, SM8450 QCS615 etc.) for over an year >>>>> and hasn't exhibited any side effects. >>>>> >>>>> [1]: https://lore.kernel.org/all/fa94cbc9-e637-ba9b-8ec8-67c6955eca98@quicinc.com/ >>>>> >>>>> Prashanth K (3): >>>>> arm64: dts: qcom: sm8150: Add snps,dis_u3_susphy_quirk >>>>> arm64: dts: qcom: sm8350: Add snps,dis_u3_susphy_quirk >>>>> arm64: dts: qcom: sm8450: Add snps,dis_u3_susphy_quirk >>>>> >>>>> Pratham Pratap (2): >>>>> arm64: dts: qcom: qcs615: Add snps,dis_u3_susphy_quirk >>>>> arm64: dts: qcom: qdu1000: Add snps,dis_u3_susphy_quirk >>>> >>>> Are there more targets affected, from the list of the ones currently >>>> supported upstream? >>>> >>>> Konrad >>> >>> My initial plan was to add it for all the QC platforms, but wasn't >>> confident enough about it. Because we have seen the issue only on these >>> targets and hence tested only on these. >> >> Okay, let's proceed with these and in the meantime please query internally >> whether it could be applicable to others too >> > > But if it applies to all qcom targets, wouldn't it make more sense to > add the property in the qcom glue driver? If we did that and the issue was ever fixed in future hw, we'd have to either re-add this patchset again or invent a snps,*en*_u3_susphy_quirk Konrad
On Wed, Mar 26, 2025 at 10:52:46AM +0530, Krishna Kurapati wrote: > > > On 3/26/2025 5:51 AM, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote: > > On Tue, Mar 25, 2025 at 08:31:55PM +0530, Prashanth K wrote: > > > > > > > > > On 25-03-25 08:11 pm, Konrad Dybcio wrote: > > > > On 3/25/25 1:30 PM, Prashanth K wrote: > > > > > During device mode initialization on certain QC targets, before the > > > > > runstop bit is set, sometimes it's observed that the GEVNTADR{LO/HI} > > > > > register write fails. As a result, GEVTADDR registers are still 0x0. > > > > > Upon setting runstop bit, DWC3 controller attempts to write the new > > > > > events to address 0x0, causing an SMMU fault and system crash. More > > > > > info about the crash at [1]. > > > > > > > > > > This was initially observed on SM8450 and later reported on few > > > > > other targets as well. As suggested by Qualcomm HW team, clearing > > > > > the GUSB3PIPECTL.SUSPHY bit resolves the issue by preventing register > > > > > write failures. Address this by setting the snps,dis_u3_susphy_quirk > > > > > to keep the GUSB3PIPECTL.SUSPHY bit cleared. This change was tested > > > > > on multiple targets (SM8350, SM8450 QCS615 etc.) for over an year > > > > > and hasn't exhibited any side effects. > > > > > > > > > > [1]: https://lore.kernel.org/all/fa94cbc9-e637-ba9b-8ec8-67c6955eca98@quicinc.com/ > > > > > > > > > > Prashanth K (3): > > > > > arm64: dts: qcom: sm8150: Add snps,dis_u3_susphy_quirk > > > > > arm64: dts: qcom: sm8350: Add snps,dis_u3_susphy_quirk > > > > > arm64: dts: qcom: sm8450: Add snps,dis_u3_susphy_quirk > > > > It is hard to belive that this quirk is to be set for SM8150, SM8350, > > SM8450, but not SM8250. > > > > At the moment we wanted to add this quirk for targets where issue has shown > up either internal to QC or at customer's end. But the issue didn't come up > on SM8250/ SM8550/ SM8650 so far either from customer end or ours. Would > like to update for other targets on need basis. I'm not questioning SM8[56]50, but not seeing SM8250 here is really doubtful.