| Message ID | cover.1590171891.git.saiprakash.ranjan@codeaurora.org (mailing list archive) |
|---|---|
| Headers | show |
| Series | Add support for replicators which loses context on clock removal | expand |
Hi Sai, On Sat, May 23, 2020 at 12:06:50AM +0530, Sai Prakash Ranjan wrote: > This series is mainly to add support for replicators > which lose context on removing AMBA clock like on SC7180 > SoC where replicator in AOSS domain loses context. > I am good with this set but need a reviewed-by on the DT binding before I can add it to my tree. The same goes for your other set[1]. Thanks, Mathieu [1]. "coresight: etm4x: Add support to skip trace unit power up" > v2 - https://lore.kernel.org/patchwork/cover/1244340/ > More discussion is found here - https://lore.kernel.org/patchwork/patch/1231182/ > > Changes since v2: > * Added DT maintainers which I missed in v2 > * Added proper kernel-doc and header as per Mathieu > > Sai Prakash Ranjan (2): > coresight: replicator: Reset replicator if context is lost > dt-bindings: arm: coresight: Add optional property to replicators > > .../devicetree/bindings/arm/coresight.txt | 6 ++ > .../coresight/coresight-replicator.c | 55 +++++++++++++------ > 2 files changed, 44 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-) > > -- > QUALCOMM INDIA, on behalf of Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member > of Code Aurora Forum, hosted by The Linux Foundation >
Hi Mathieu, On 2020-05-25 21:45, Mathieu Poirier wrote: > Hi Sai, > > On Sat, May 23, 2020 at 12:06:50AM +0530, Sai Prakash Ranjan wrote: >> This series is mainly to add support for replicators >> which lose context on removing AMBA clock like on SC7180 >> SoC where replicator in AOSS domain loses context. >> > > I am good with this set but need a reviewed-by on the DT binding before > I can > add it to my tree. The same goes for your other set[1]. > Sure, let's wait for an ack from Rob and thanks for the reviews. Thanks, Sai
On Mon, May 25, 2020 at 10:15:53AM -0600, Mathieu Poirier wrote: > Hi Sai, > > On Sat, May 23, 2020 at 12:06:50AM +0530, Sai Prakash Ranjan wrote: > > This series is mainly to add support for replicators > > which lose context on removing AMBA clock like on SC7180 > > SoC where replicator in AOSS domain loses context. > > > > I am good with this set but need a reviewed-by on the DT binding before I can > add it to my tree. The same goes for your other set[1]. Then why is it already in linux-next? In any case, Acked-by: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>
On Thu, May 28, 2020 at 08:48:03AM -0600, Rob Herring wrote: > On Mon, May 25, 2020 at 10:15:53AM -0600, Mathieu Poirier wrote: > > Hi Sai, > > > > On Sat, May 23, 2020 at 12:06:50AM +0530, Sai Prakash Ranjan wrote: > > > This series is mainly to add support for replicators > > > which lose context on removing AMBA clock like on SC7180 > > > SoC where replicator in AOSS domain loses context. > > > > > > > I am good with this set but need a reviewed-by on the DT binding before I can > > add it to my tree. The same goes for your other set[1]. > > Then why is it already in linux-next? I wanted the patches to get exposure to linux-next before sending them on to Greg for inclusion in the next merge window. Rest assured that I would not have moved forward without your consent. > > In any case, > > Acked-by: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org> Thank you for that. Mathieu