From patchwork Mon Nov 29 08:22:10 2021 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Fenglin Wu X-Patchwork-Id: 12643797 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AF5A3C433F5 for ; Mon, 29 Nov 2021 08:24:52 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S244147AbhK2I2H (ORCPT ); Mon, 29 Nov 2021 03:28:07 -0500 Received: from alexa-out-sd-02.qualcomm.com ([199.106.114.39]:5141 "EHLO alexa-out-sd-02.qualcomm.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S243303AbhK2I0G (ORCPT ); Mon, 29 Nov 2021 03:26:06 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=quicinc.com; i=@quicinc.com; q=dns/txt; s=qcdkim; t=1638174169; x=1669710169; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to: references:mime-version; bh=6IMGfTuF3BVQ6/1Vk5UOBnvjkDqjWlq1aGTwIYOXs9w=; b=nbb1Lmg58cSXDkxm8GGOJJ5iE9XJh3QUNHVs33icUxH/hKnyhM26DtsP PIx5rFH07vauzPnS5/YR9KcK0GcFG718ocqTf1HiTo+AqYYEXXsItLqda DruuzIAGgmGUShFUhWG80YrIqVUnPLsPXZLukKohOcfkTRkfutde44fQ2 U=; Received: from unknown (HELO ironmsg02-sd.qualcomm.com) ([10.53.140.142]) by alexa-out-sd-02.qualcomm.com with ESMTP; 29 Nov 2021 00:22:49 -0800 X-QCInternal: smtphost Received: from nasanex01c.na.qualcomm.com ([10.47.97.222]) by ironmsg02-sd.qualcomm.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 29 Nov 2021 00:22:49 -0800 Received: from nalasex01c.na.qualcomm.com (10.47.97.35) by nasanex01c.na.qualcomm.com (10.47.97.222) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.2.922.19; Mon, 29 Nov 2021 00:22:48 -0800 Received: from fenglinw-gv.qualcomm.com (10.80.80.8) by nalasex01c.na.qualcomm.com (10.47.97.35) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.2.922.19; Mon, 29 Nov 2021 00:22:46 -0800 From: Fenglin Wu To: , , CC: , , Subject: [PATCH v3 03/10] spmi: pmic-arb: check apid against limits before calling irq handler Date: Mon, 29 Nov 2021 16:22:10 +0800 Message-ID: <1638174137-23290-4-git-send-email-quic_fenglinw@quicinc.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.7.4 In-Reply-To: <1638174137-23290-1-git-send-email-quic_fenglinw@quicinc.com> References: <1638174137-23290-1-git-send-email-quic_fenglinw@quicinc.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Originating-IP: [10.80.80.8] X-ClientProxiedBy: nasanex01a.na.qualcomm.com (10.52.223.231) To nalasex01c.na.qualcomm.com (10.47.97.35) Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org From: David Collins Check that the apid for an SPMI interrupt falls between the min_apid and max_apid that can be handled by the APPS processor before invoking the per-apid interrupt handler: periph_interrupt(). This avoids an access violation in rare cases where the status bit is set for an interrupt that is not owned by the APPS processor. Signed-off-by: David Collins Signed-off-by: Fenglin Wu --- drivers/spmi/spmi-pmic-arb.c | 11 ++++++++--- 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/spmi/spmi-pmic-arb.c b/drivers/spmi/spmi-pmic-arb.c index ce7ae99..479f721 100644 --- a/drivers/spmi/spmi-pmic-arb.c +++ b/drivers/spmi/spmi-pmic-arb.c @@ -523,21 +523,26 @@ static void pmic_arb_chained_irq(struct irq_desc *desc) struct spmi_pmic_arb *pmic_arb = irq_desc_get_handler_data(desc); const struct pmic_arb_ver_ops *ver_ops = pmic_arb->ver_ops; struct irq_chip *chip = irq_desc_get_chip(desc); - int first = pmic_arb->min_apid >> 5; - int last = pmic_arb->max_apid >> 5; + int first = pmic_arb->min_apid; + int last = pmic_arb->max_apid; u8 ee = pmic_arb->ee; u32 status, enable, handled = 0; int i, id, apid; chained_irq_enter(chip, desc); - for (i = first; i <= last; ++i) { + for (i = first >> 5; i <= last >> 5; ++i) { status = readl_relaxed( ver_ops->owner_acc_status(pmic_arb, ee, i)); while (status) { id = ffs(status) - 1; status &= ~BIT(id); apid = id + i * 32; + if (apid < first || apid > last) { + WARN_ONCE(true, "spurious spmi irq received for apid=%d\n", + apid); + continue; + } enable = readl_relaxed( ver_ops->acc_enable(pmic_arb, apid)); if (enable & SPMI_PIC_ACC_ENABLE_BIT)