diff mbox series

[v6,2/2] arm64: dts: qcom: sc7280: add lpass lpi pin controller node

Message ID 1649157167-29106-3-git-send-email-quic_srivasam@quicinc.com (mailing list archive)
State Superseded
Headers show
Series Add lpass pin control support for audio on sc7280 based targets | expand

Commit Message

Srinivasa Rao Mandadapu April 5, 2022, 11:12 a.m. UTC
Add LPASS LPI pinctrl node required for Audio functionality on sc7280
based platforms.

Signed-off-by: Srinivasa Rao Mandadapu <quic_srivasam@quicinc.com>
Co-developed-by: Venkata Prasad Potturu <quic_potturu@quicinc.com>
Signed-off-by: Venkata Prasad Potturu <quic_potturu@quicinc.com>
---
 arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sc7280-idp.dtsi |  98 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sc7280.dtsi     | 107 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 2 files changed, 205 insertions(+)

Comments

Matthias Kaehlcke April 5, 2022, 5:14 p.m. UTC | #1
On Tue, Apr 05, 2022 at 04:42:47PM +0530, Srinivasa Rao Mandadapu wrote:
> Add LPASS LPI pinctrl node required for Audio functionality on sc7280
> based platforms.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Srinivasa Rao Mandadapu <quic_srivasam@quicinc.com>
> Co-developed-by: Venkata Prasad Potturu <quic_potturu@quicinc.com>
> Signed-off-by: Venkata Prasad Potturu <quic_potturu@quicinc.com>
> ---
>  arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sc7280-idp.dtsi |  98 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sc7280.dtsi     | 107 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  2 files changed, 205 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sc7280-idp.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sc7280-idp.dtsi
> index 2afbbe3..f912a89 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sc7280-idp.dtsi
> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sc7280-idp.dtsi
> @@ -238,6 +238,104 @@
>  	modem-init;
>  };
>  
> +&lpass_tlmm {
> +	dmic01_active: dmic01-active {
> +		clk {
> +			drive-strength = <8>;
> +		};
> +
> +		data {
> +			drive-strength = <8>;

The DMIC data pins are input pins, right? Why does an input pin need a drive
strength? Same for other input pins.

> +		};
> +	};

There's no need to reference 'lpass_tlmm' nor to repeat $label: $node.
Instead just use phandles:

&dmic01_active {
	clk {
		drive-strength = <8>;
	};

	data {
		drive-strength = <8>;
	};
};

Rather than replicating the node hierarchy you could also just give each pin a
label, and then:

&dmic01_clk_active {
	drive-strength = <8>;
};

&dmic01_data_active {
	drive-strength = <8>;
};

I don't have a strong preference, but wonder if the grouping adds any value.

> +
> +	dmic01_sleep: dmic01-sleep {
> +		clk {
> +			drive-strength = <2>;
> +			bias-disable;
> +		};
> +
> +		data {
> +			drive-strength = <2>;
> +			pull-down;
> +		};
> +	};
> +
> +	dmic23_active: dmic02-active {
> +		clk {
> +			drive-strength = <8>;
> +		};
> +
> +		data {
> +			drive-strength = <8>;
> +		};
> +	};
> +
> +	dmic23_sleep: dmic02-sleep {
> +		clk {
> +			drive-strength = <2>;
> +			bias-disable;
> +		};
> +
> +		data {
> +			drive-strength = <2>;
> +			pull-down;
> +		};
> +	};
> +
> +	rx_swr_active: rx-swr-active {
> +		clk {
> +			drive-strength = <2>;
> +			slew-rate = <1>;
> +			bias-disable;
> +		};
> +
> +		data {
> +			drive-strength = <2>;
> +			slew-rate = <1>;
> +			bias-bus-hold;
> +		};
> +	};
> +
> +	rx_swr_sleep: rx-swr-sleep {
> +		clk {
> +			drive-strength = <2>;
> +			bias-pull-down;
> +		};
> +
> +		data {
> +			drive-strength = <2>;
> +			bias-pull-down;
> +		};
> +	};
> +
> +	tx_swr_active: tx-swr-active {
> +		clk {
> +			drive-strength = <2>;
> +			slew-rate = <1>;
> +			bias-disable;
> +		};
> +
> +		data {
> +			drive-strength = <2>;
> +			slew-rate = <1>;
> +			bias-bus-hold;
> +		};
> +	};
> +
> +	tx_swr_sleep: tx-swr-sleep {
> +		clk {
> +			drive-strength = <2>;
> +			bias-pull-down;
> +		};
> +
> +		data {
> +			drive-strength = <2>;
> +			bias-bus-hold;
> +		};
> +	};
> +};
> +
>  &pcie1 {
>  	status = "okay";
>  	perst-gpio = <&tlmm 2 GPIO_ACTIVE_LOW>;
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sc7280.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sc7280.dtsi
> index 8d8cec5..db74fc3 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sc7280.dtsi
> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sc7280.dtsi
> @@ -1987,6 +1987,113 @@
>  			qcom,bcm-voters = <&apps_bcm_voter>;
>  		};
>  
> +		lpass_tlmm: pinctrl@33c0000 {
> +			compatible = "qcom,sc7280-lpass-lpi-pinctrl";
> +			reg = <0 0x33c0000 0x0 0x20000>,
> +				<0 0x3550000 0x0 0x10000>;

Pad addresses to 8 digits.

> +			gpio-controller;
> +			#gpio-cells = <2>;
> +			gpio-ranges = <&lpass_tlmm 0 0 15>;
> +
> +			#clock-cells = <1>;
> +
> +			dmic01_active: dmic01-active {
> +				clk {
> +					pins = "gpio6";
> +					function = "dmic1_clk";
> +				};
> +
> +				data {
> +					pins = "gpio7";
> +					function = "dmic1_data";
> +				};
> +			};
> +
> +			dmic01_sleep: dmic01-sleep {
> +				clk {
> +					pins = "gpio6";
> +					function = "dmic1_clk";
> +				};
> +
> +				data {
> +					pins = "gpio7";
> +					function = "dmic1_data";
> +				};
> +			};
> +
> +			dmic23_active: dmic02-active {

is it intentional that the node name is 'dmic02*', but the label 'dmic23*'?

> +				clk {
> +					pins = "gpio8";
> +					function = "dmic2_clk";
> +				};
> +
> +				data {
> +					pins = "gpio9";
> +					function = "dmic2_data";
> +				};
> +			};
> +
> +			dmic23_sleep: dmic02-sleep {

ditto

> +				clk {
> +					pins = "gpio8";
> +					function = "dmic2_clk";
> +				};
> +
> +				data {
> +					pins = "gpio9";
> +					function = "dmic2_data";
> +				};
> +			};
> +
> +			rx_swr_active: rx-swr-active {
> +				clk {
> +					pins = "gpio3";
> +					function = "swr_rx_clk";
> +				};
> +
> +				data {
> +					pins = "gpio4", "gpio5";
> +					function = "swr_rx_data";
> +				};
> +			};
> +
> +			rx_swr_sleep: rx-swr-sleep {
> +				clk {
> +					pins = "gpio3";
> +					function = "swr_rx_clk";
> +				};
> +
> +				data {
> +					pins = "gpio4", "gpio5";
> +					function = "swr_rx_data";
> +				};
> +			};
> +
> +			tx_swr_active: tx-swr-active {
> +				clk {
> +					pins = "gpio0";
> +					function = "swr_tx_clk";
> +				};
> +
> +				data {
> +					pins = "gpio1", "gpio2", "gpio14";
> +					function = "swr_tx_data";
> +				};
> +			};
> +
> +			tx_swr_sleep: tx-swr-sleep {
> +				clk {
> +					pins = "gpio0";
> +					function = "swr_tx_clk";
> +				};
> +
> +				data {
> +					pins = "gpio1", "gpio2", "gpio14";
> +					function = "swr_tx_data";
> +				};
> +			};
> +		};
> +
>  		gpu: gpu@3d00000 {
>  			compatible = "qcom,adreno-635.0", "qcom,adreno";
>  			reg = <0 0x03d00000 0 0x40000>,
Matthias Kaehlcke April 6, 2022, 2:15 a.m. UTC | #2
On Tue, Apr 05, 2022 at 10:14:20AM -0700, Matthias Kaehlcke wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 05, 2022 at 04:42:47PM +0530, Srinivasa Rao Mandadapu wrote:
> > Add LPASS LPI pinctrl node required for Audio functionality on sc7280
> > based platforms.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Srinivasa Rao Mandadapu <quic_srivasam@quicinc.com>
> > Co-developed-by: Venkata Prasad Potturu <quic_potturu@quicinc.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Venkata Prasad Potturu <quic_potturu@quicinc.com>
> > ---
> >  arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sc7280-idp.dtsi |  98 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> >  arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sc7280.dtsi     | 107 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> >  2 files changed, 205 insertions(+)
> > 
> > diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sc7280-idp.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sc7280-idp.dtsi
> > index 2afbbe3..f912a89 100644
> > --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sc7280-idp.dtsi
> > +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sc7280-idp.dtsi
> > @@ -238,6 +238,104 @@
> >  	modem-init;
> >  };
> >  
> > +&lpass_tlmm {
> > +	dmic01_active: dmic01-active {
> > +		clk {
> > +			drive-strength = <8>;
> > +		};
> > +
> > +		data {
> > +			drive-strength = <8>;
> 
> The DMIC data pins are input pins, right? Why does an input pin need a drive
> strength? Same for other input pins.
> 
> > +		};
> > +	};
> 
> There's no need to reference 'lpass_tlmm' nor to repeat $label: $node.
> Instead just use phandles:
> 
> &dmic01_active {
> 	clk {
> 		drive-strength = <8>;
> 	};
> 
> 	data {
> 		drive-strength = <8>;
> 	};
> };
> 
> Rather than replicating the node hierarchy you could also just give each pin a
> label, and then:
> 
> &dmic01_clk_active {
> 	drive-strength = <8>;
> };
> 
> &dmic01_data_active {
> 	drive-strength = <8>;
> };
> 
> I don't have a strong preference, but wonder if the grouping adds any value.

One more thing: please also drop the '_active' suffix, it is not needed. With
that I think it's clearer to get rid of the grouping.

> > +
> > +	dmic01_sleep: dmic01-sleep {
> > +		clk {
> > +			drive-strength = <2>;
> > +			bias-disable;
> > +		};
> > +
> > +		data {
> > +			drive-strength = <2>;
> > +			pull-down;
> > +		};
> > +	};
> > +
> > +	dmic23_active: dmic02-active {
> > +		clk {
> > +			drive-strength = <8>;
> > +		};
> > +
> > +		data {
> > +			drive-strength = <8>;
> > +		};
> > +	};
> > +
> > +	dmic23_sleep: dmic02-sleep {
> > +		clk {
> > +			drive-strength = <2>;
> > +			bias-disable;
> > +		};
> > +
> > +		data {
> > +			drive-strength = <2>;
> > +			pull-down;
> > +		};
> > +	};
> > +
> > +	rx_swr_active: rx-swr-active {
> > +		clk {
> > +			drive-strength = <2>;
> > +			slew-rate = <1>;
> > +			bias-disable;
> > +		};
> > +
> > +		data {
> > +			drive-strength = <2>;
> > +			slew-rate = <1>;
> > +			bias-bus-hold;
> > +		};
> > +	};
> > +
> > +	rx_swr_sleep: rx-swr-sleep {
> > +		clk {
> > +			drive-strength = <2>;
> > +			bias-pull-down;
> > +		};
> > +
> > +		data {
> > +			drive-strength = <2>;
> > +			bias-pull-down;
> > +		};
> > +	};
> > +
> > +	tx_swr_active: tx-swr-active {
> > +		clk {
> > +			drive-strength = <2>;
> > +			slew-rate = <1>;
> > +			bias-disable;
> > +		};
> > +
> > +		data {
> > +			drive-strength = <2>;
> > +			slew-rate = <1>;
> > +			bias-bus-hold;
> > +		};
> > +	};
> > +
> > +	tx_swr_sleep: tx-swr-sleep {
> > +		clk {
> > +			drive-strength = <2>;
> > +			bias-pull-down;
> > +		};
> > +
> > +		data {
> > +			drive-strength = <2>;
> > +			bias-bus-hold;
> > +		};
> > +	};
> > +};
> > +
> >  &pcie1 {
> >  	status = "okay";
> >  	perst-gpio = <&tlmm 2 GPIO_ACTIVE_LOW>;
> > diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sc7280.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sc7280.dtsi
> > index 8d8cec5..db74fc3 100644
> > --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sc7280.dtsi
> > +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sc7280.dtsi
> > @@ -1987,6 +1987,113 @@
> >  			qcom,bcm-voters = <&apps_bcm_voter>;
> >  		};
> >  
> > +		lpass_tlmm: pinctrl@33c0000 {
> > +			compatible = "qcom,sc7280-lpass-lpi-pinctrl";
> > +			reg = <0 0x33c0000 0x0 0x20000>,
> > +				<0 0x3550000 0x0 0x10000>;
> 
> Pad addresses to 8 digits.
> 
> > +			gpio-controller;
> > +			#gpio-cells = <2>;
> > +			gpio-ranges = <&lpass_tlmm 0 0 15>;
> > +
> > +			#clock-cells = <1>;
> > +
> > +			dmic01_active: dmic01-active {
> > +				clk {
> > +					pins = "gpio6";
> > +					function = "dmic1_clk";
> > +				};
> > +
> > +				data {
> > +					pins = "gpio7";
> > +					function = "dmic1_data";
> > +				};
> > +			};
> > +
> > +			dmic01_sleep: dmic01-sleep {
> > +				clk {
> > +					pins = "gpio6";
> > +					function = "dmic1_clk";
> > +				};
> > +
> > +				data {
> > +					pins = "gpio7";
> > +					function = "dmic1_data";
> > +				};
> > +			};
> > +
> > +			dmic23_active: dmic02-active {
> 
> is it intentional that the node name is 'dmic02*', but the label 'dmic23*'?
> 
> > +				clk {
> > +					pins = "gpio8";
> > +					function = "dmic2_clk";
> > +				};
> > +
> > +				data {
> > +					pins = "gpio9";
> > +					function = "dmic2_data";
> > +				};
> > +			};
> > +
> > +			dmic23_sleep: dmic02-sleep {
> 
> ditto
> 
> > +				clk {
> > +					pins = "gpio8";
> > +					function = "dmic2_clk";
> > +				};
> > +
> > +				data {
> > +					pins = "gpio9";
> > +					function = "dmic2_data";
> > +				};
> > +			};
> > +
> > +			rx_swr_active: rx-swr-active {
> > +				clk {
> > +					pins = "gpio3";
> > +					function = "swr_rx_clk";
> > +				};
> > +
> > +				data {
> > +					pins = "gpio4", "gpio5";
> > +					function = "swr_rx_data";
> > +				};
> > +			};
> > +
> > +			rx_swr_sleep: rx-swr-sleep {
> > +				clk {
> > +					pins = "gpio3";
> > +					function = "swr_rx_clk";
> > +				};
> > +
> > +				data {
> > +					pins = "gpio4", "gpio5";
> > +					function = "swr_rx_data";
> > +				};
> > +			};
> > +
> > +			tx_swr_active: tx-swr-active {
> > +				clk {
> > +					pins = "gpio0";
> > +					function = "swr_tx_clk";
> > +				};
> > +
> > +				data {
> > +					pins = "gpio1", "gpio2", "gpio14";
> > +					function = "swr_tx_data";
> > +				};
> > +			};
> > +
> > +			tx_swr_sleep: tx-swr-sleep {
> > +				clk {
> > +					pins = "gpio0";
> > +					function = "swr_tx_clk";
> > +				};
> > +
> > +				data {
> > +					pins = "gpio1", "gpio2", "gpio14";
> > +					function = "swr_tx_data";
> > +				};
> > +			};
> > +		};
> > +
> >  		gpu: gpu@3d00000 {
> >  			compatible = "qcom,adreno-635.0", "qcom,adreno";
> >  			reg = <0 0x03d00000 0 0x40000>,
Srinivasa Rao Mandadapu April 11, 2022, 1:36 p.m. UTC | #3
On 4/6/2022 7:45 AM, Matthias Kaehlcke wrote:
Thanks Matthias for your time and Valuable inputs!!!
> On Tue, Apr 05, 2022 at 10:14:20AM -0700, Matthias Kaehlcke wrote:
>> On Tue, Apr 05, 2022 at 04:42:47PM +0530, Srinivasa Rao Mandadapu wrote:
>>> Add LPASS LPI pinctrl node required for Audio functionality on sc7280
>>> based platforms.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Srinivasa Rao Mandadapu <quic_srivasam@quicinc.com>
>>> Co-developed-by: Venkata Prasad Potturu <quic_potturu@quicinc.com>
>>> Signed-off-by: Venkata Prasad Potturu <quic_potturu@quicinc.com>
>>> ---
>>>   arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sc7280-idp.dtsi |  98 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>>   arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sc7280.dtsi     | 107 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>>   2 files changed, 205 insertions(+)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sc7280-idp.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sc7280-idp.dtsi
>>> index 2afbbe3..f912a89 100644
>>> --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sc7280-idp.dtsi
>>> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sc7280-idp.dtsi
>>> @@ -238,6 +238,104 @@
>>>   	modem-init;
>>>   };
>>>   
>>> +&lpass_tlmm {
>>> +	dmic01_active: dmic01-active {
>>> +		clk {
>>> +			drive-strength = <8>;
>>> +		};
>>> +
>>> +		data {
>>> +			drive-strength = <8>;
>> The DMIC data pins are input pins, right? Why does an input pin need a drive
>> strength? Same for other input pins.
Okay. Will remove this.
>>
>>> +		};
>>> +	};
>> There's no need to reference 'lpass_tlmm' nor to repeat $label: $node.
>> Instead just use phandles:
Okay. Will change accordingly.
>>
>> &dmic01_active {
>> 	clk {
>> 		drive-strength = <8>;
>> 	};
>>
>> 	data {
>> 		drive-strength = <8>;
>> 	};
>> };
>>
>> Rather than replicating the node hierarchy you could also just give each pin a
>> label, and then:
>>
>> &dmic01_clk_active {
>> 	drive-strength = <8>;
>> };
>>
>> &dmic01_data_active {
>> 	drive-strength = <8>;
>> };
>>
>> I don't have a strong preference, but wonder if the grouping adds any value.
> One more thing: please also drop the '_active' suffix, it is not needed. With
> that I think it's clearer to get rid of the grouping.
For now will continue as it's.  Anyway we are removing dmic01_data_active.
>
>>> +
>>> +	dmic01_sleep: dmic01-sleep {
>>> +		clk {
>>> +			drive-strength = <2>;
>>> +			bias-disable;
>>> +		};
>>> +
>>> +		data {
>>> +			drive-strength = <2>;
>>> +			pull-down;
>>> +		};
>>> +	};
>>> +
>>> +	dmic23_active: dmic02-active {
>>> +		clk {
>>> +			drive-strength = <8>;
>>> +		};
>>> +
>>> +		data {
>>> +			drive-strength = <8>;
>>> +		};
>>> +	};
>>> +
>>> +	dmic23_sleep: dmic02-sleep {
>>> +		clk {
>>> +			drive-strength = <2>;
>>> +			bias-disable;
>>> +		};
>>> +
>>> +		data {
>>> +			drive-strength = <2>;
>>> +			pull-down;
>>> +		};
>>> +	};
>>> +
>>> +	rx_swr_active: rx-swr-active {
>>> +		clk {
>>> +			drive-strength = <2>;
>>> +			slew-rate = <1>;
>>> +			bias-disable;
>>> +		};
>>> +
>>> +		data {
>>> +			drive-strength = <2>;
>>> +			slew-rate = <1>;
>>> +			bias-bus-hold;
>>> +		};
>>> +	};
>>> +
>>> +	rx_swr_sleep: rx-swr-sleep {
>>> +		clk {
>>> +			drive-strength = <2>;
>>> +			bias-pull-down;
>>> +		};
>>> +
>>> +		data {
>>> +			drive-strength = <2>;
>>> +			bias-pull-down;
>>> +		};
>>> +	};
>>> +
>>> +	tx_swr_active: tx-swr-active {
>>> +		clk {
>>> +			drive-strength = <2>;
>>> +			slew-rate = <1>;
>>> +			bias-disable;
>>> +		};
>>> +
>>> +		data {
>>> +			drive-strength = <2>;
>>> +			slew-rate = <1>;
>>> +			bias-bus-hold;
>>> +		};
>>> +	};
>>> +
>>> +	tx_swr_sleep: tx-swr-sleep {
>>> +		clk {
>>> +			drive-strength = <2>;
>>> +			bias-pull-down;
>>> +		};
>>> +
>>> +		data {
>>> +			drive-strength = <2>;
>>> +			bias-bus-hold;
>>> +		};
>>> +	};
>>> +};
>>> +
>>>   &pcie1 {
>>>   	status = "okay";
>>>   	perst-gpio = <&tlmm 2 GPIO_ACTIVE_LOW>;
>>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sc7280.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sc7280.dtsi
>>> index 8d8cec5..db74fc3 100644
>>> --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sc7280.dtsi
>>> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sc7280.dtsi
>>> @@ -1987,6 +1987,113 @@
>>>   			qcom,bcm-voters = <&apps_bcm_voter>;
>>>   		};
>>>   
>>> +		lpass_tlmm: pinctrl@33c0000 {
>>> +			compatible = "qcom,sc7280-lpass-lpi-pinctrl";
>>> +			reg = <0 0x33c0000 0x0 0x20000>,
>>> +				<0 0x3550000 0x0 0x10000>;
>> Pad addresses to 8 digits.
Okay.
>>
>>> +			gpio-controller;
>>> +			#gpio-cells = <2>;
>>> +			gpio-ranges = <&lpass_tlmm 0 0 15>;
>>> +
>>> +			#clock-cells = <1>;
>>> +
>>> +			dmic01_active: dmic01-active {
>>> +				clk {
>>> +					pins = "gpio6";
>>> +					function = "dmic1_clk";
>>> +				};
>>> +
>>> +				data {
>>> +					pins = "gpio7";
>>> +					function = "dmic1_data";
>>> +				};
>>> +			};
>>> +
>>> +			dmic01_sleep: dmic01-sleep {
>>> +				clk {
>>> +					pins = "gpio6";
>>> +					function = "dmic1_clk";
>>> +				};
>>> +
>>> +				data {
>>> +					pins = "gpio7";
>>> +					function = "dmic1_data";
>>> +				};
>>> +			};
>>> +
>>> +			dmic23_active: dmic02-active {
>> is it intentional that the node name is 'dmic02*', but the label 'dmic23*'?
typo error. will fix it.
>>
>>> +				clk {
>>> +					pins = "gpio8";
>>> +					function = "dmic2_clk";
>>> +				};
>>> +
>>> +				data {
>>> +					pins = "gpio9";
>>> +					function = "dmic2_data";
>>> +				};
>>> +			};
>>> +
>>> +			dmic23_sleep: dmic02-sleep {
>> ditto
Okay.
>>
>>> +				clk {
>>> +					pins = "gpio8";
>>> +					function = "dmic2_clk";
>>> +				};
>>> +
>>> +				data {
>>> +					pins = "gpio9";
>>> +					function = "dmic2_data";
>>> +				};
>>> +			};
>>> +
>>> +			rx_swr_active: rx-swr-active {
>>> +				clk {
>>> +					pins = "gpio3";
>>> +					function = "swr_rx_clk";
>>> +				};
>>> +
>>> +				data {
>>> +					pins = "gpio4", "gpio5";
>>> +					function = "swr_rx_data";
>>> +				};
>>> +			};
>>> +
>>> +			rx_swr_sleep: rx-swr-sleep {
>>> +				clk {
>>> +					pins = "gpio3";
>>> +					function = "swr_rx_clk";
>>> +				};
>>> +
>>> +				data {
>>> +					pins = "gpio4", "gpio5";
>>> +					function = "swr_rx_data";
>>> +				};
>>> +			};
>>> +
>>> +			tx_swr_active: tx-swr-active {
>>> +				clk {
>>> +					pins = "gpio0";
>>> +					function = "swr_tx_clk";
>>> +				};
>>> +
>>> +				data {
>>> +					pins = "gpio1", "gpio2", "gpio14";
>>> +					function = "swr_tx_data";
>>> +				};
>>> +			};
>>> +
>>> +			tx_swr_sleep: tx-swr-sleep {
>>> +				clk {
>>> +					pins = "gpio0";
>>> +					function = "swr_tx_clk";
>>> +				};
>>> +
>>> +				data {
>>> +					pins = "gpio1", "gpio2", "gpio14";
>>> +					function = "swr_tx_data";
>>> +				};
>>> +			};
>>> +		};
>>> +
>>>   		gpu: gpu@3d00000 {
>>>   			compatible = "qcom,adreno-635.0", "qcom,adreno";
>>>   			reg = <0 0x03d00000 0 0x40000>,
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sc7280-idp.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sc7280-idp.dtsi
index 2afbbe3..f912a89 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sc7280-idp.dtsi
+++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sc7280-idp.dtsi
@@ -238,6 +238,104 @@ 
 	modem-init;
 };
 
+&lpass_tlmm {
+	dmic01_active: dmic01-active {
+		clk {
+			drive-strength = <8>;
+		};
+
+		data {
+			drive-strength = <8>;
+		};
+	};
+
+	dmic01_sleep: dmic01-sleep {
+		clk {
+			drive-strength = <2>;
+			bias-disable;
+		};
+
+		data {
+			drive-strength = <2>;
+			pull-down;
+		};
+	};
+
+	dmic23_active: dmic02-active {
+		clk {
+			drive-strength = <8>;
+		};
+
+		data {
+			drive-strength = <8>;
+		};
+	};
+
+	dmic23_sleep: dmic02-sleep {
+		clk {
+			drive-strength = <2>;
+			bias-disable;
+		};
+
+		data {
+			drive-strength = <2>;
+			pull-down;
+		};
+	};
+
+	rx_swr_active: rx-swr-active {
+		clk {
+			drive-strength = <2>;
+			slew-rate = <1>;
+			bias-disable;
+		};
+
+		data {
+			drive-strength = <2>;
+			slew-rate = <1>;
+			bias-bus-hold;
+		};
+	};
+
+	rx_swr_sleep: rx-swr-sleep {
+		clk {
+			drive-strength = <2>;
+			bias-pull-down;
+		};
+
+		data {
+			drive-strength = <2>;
+			bias-pull-down;
+		};
+	};
+
+	tx_swr_active: tx-swr-active {
+		clk {
+			drive-strength = <2>;
+			slew-rate = <1>;
+			bias-disable;
+		};
+
+		data {
+			drive-strength = <2>;
+			slew-rate = <1>;
+			bias-bus-hold;
+		};
+	};
+
+	tx_swr_sleep: tx-swr-sleep {
+		clk {
+			drive-strength = <2>;
+			bias-pull-down;
+		};
+
+		data {
+			drive-strength = <2>;
+			bias-bus-hold;
+		};
+	};
+};
+
 &pcie1 {
 	status = "okay";
 	perst-gpio = <&tlmm 2 GPIO_ACTIVE_LOW>;
diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sc7280.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sc7280.dtsi
index 8d8cec5..db74fc3 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sc7280.dtsi
+++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sc7280.dtsi
@@ -1987,6 +1987,113 @@ 
 			qcom,bcm-voters = <&apps_bcm_voter>;
 		};
 
+		lpass_tlmm: pinctrl@33c0000 {
+			compatible = "qcom,sc7280-lpass-lpi-pinctrl";
+			reg = <0 0x33c0000 0x0 0x20000>,
+				<0 0x3550000 0x0 0x10000>;
+			gpio-controller;
+			#gpio-cells = <2>;
+			gpio-ranges = <&lpass_tlmm 0 0 15>;
+
+			#clock-cells = <1>;
+
+			dmic01_active: dmic01-active {
+				clk {
+					pins = "gpio6";
+					function = "dmic1_clk";
+				};
+
+				data {
+					pins = "gpio7";
+					function = "dmic1_data";
+				};
+			};
+
+			dmic01_sleep: dmic01-sleep {
+				clk {
+					pins = "gpio6";
+					function = "dmic1_clk";
+				};
+
+				data {
+					pins = "gpio7";
+					function = "dmic1_data";
+				};
+			};
+
+			dmic23_active: dmic02-active {
+				clk {
+					pins = "gpio8";
+					function = "dmic2_clk";
+				};
+
+				data {
+					pins = "gpio9";
+					function = "dmic2_data";
+				};
+			};
+
+			dmic23_sleep: dmic02-sleep {
+				clk {
+					pins = "gpio8";
+					function = "dmic2_clk";
+				};
+
+				data {
+					pins = "gpio9";
+					function = "dmic2_data";
+				};
+			};
+
+			rx_swr_active: rx-swr-active {
+				clk {
+					pins = "gpio3";
+					function = "swr_rx_clk";
+				};
+
+				data {
+					pins = "gpio4", "gpio5";
+					function = "swr_rx_data";
+				};
+			};
+
+			rx_swr_sleep: rx-swr-sleep {
+				clk {
+					pins = "gpio3";
+					function = "swr_rx_clk";
+				};
+
+				data {
+					pins = "gpio4", "gpio5";
+					function = "swr_rx_data";
+				};
+			};
+
+			tx_swr_active: tx-swr-active {
+				clk {
+					pins = "gpio0";
+					function = "swr_tx_clk";
+				};
+
+				data {
+					pins = "gpio1", "gpio2", "gpio14";
+					function = "swr_tx_data";
+				};
+			};
+
+			tx_swr_sleep: tx-swr-sleep {
+				clk {
+					pins = "gpio0";
+					function = "swr_tx_clk";
+				};
+
+				data {
+					pins = "gpio1", "gpio2", "gpio14";
+					function = "swr_tx_data";
+				};
+			};
+		};
+
 		gpu: gpu@3d00000 {
 			compatible = "qcom,adreno-635.0", "qcom,adreno";
 			reg = <0 0x03d00000 0 0x40000>,