Message ID | 20180318203832.GA74597@lkp-hsx03.lkp.intel.com (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
State | Not Applicable, archived |
Headers | show |
On 03/18/2018 01:38 PM, kbuild test robot wrote: > From: Fengguang Wu <fengguang.wu@intel.com> > > drivers/regulator/qcom_rpmh-regulator.c:1104:3-8: > No need to set .owner here. The core will do it. Thanks for pointing this out. > --- a/drivers/regulator/qcom_rpmh-regulator.c > +++ b/drivers/regulator/qcom_rpmh-regulator.c > @@ -1101,7 +1101,6 @@ static struct platform_driver rpmh_regul > .driver = { > .name = "qcom-rpmh-regulator", > .of_match_table = rpmh_regulator_match_table, > - .owner = THIS_MODULE, > }, > .probe = rpmh_regulator_probe, > .remove = rpmh_regulator_remove, I'll make this modification in [1] if I end up sending out a second version of the patch. Take care, David [1]: https://lkml.org/lkml/2018/3/16/1430
--- a/drivers/regulator/qcom_rpmh-regulator.c +++ b/drivers/regulator/qcom_rpmh-regulator.c @@ -1101,7 +1101,6 @@ static struct platform_driver rpmh_regul .driver = { .name = "qcom-rpmh-regulator", .of_match_table = rpmh_regulator_match_table, - .owner = THIS_MODULE, }, .probe = rpmh_regulator_probe, .remove = rpmh_regulator_remove,