From patchwork Fri Dec 13 23:45:26 2019 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Doug Anderson X-Patchwork-Id: 11291929 Return-Path: Received: from mail.kernel.org (pdx-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [172.30.200.123]) by pdx-korg-patchwork-2.web.codeaurora.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 87A14930 for ; Fri, 13 Dec 2019 23:46:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6794924125 for ; Fri, 13 Dec 2019 23:46:12 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=chromium.org header.i=@chromium.org header.b="ZsIZN4XD" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726841AbfLMXqL (ORCPT ); Fri, 13 Dec 2019 18:46:11 -0500 Received: from mail-pj1-f65.google.com ([209.85.216.65]:37177 "EHLO mail-pj1-f65.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726825AbfLMXqK (ORCPT ); Fri, 13 Dec 2019 18:46:10 -0500 Received: by mail-pj1-f65.google.com with SMTP id ep17so383272pjb.4 for ; Fri, 13 Dec 2019 15:46:10 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=chromium.org; s=google; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=UUJY8C2R1UDrN9sVA9Df9NEy0bvM49t/SSGj3bqxYIA=; b=ZsIZN4XD3zKnYDKUlFHgZN5qlLlZaKZvDA3IqUDEaZ1MKvXpxV2C0yQcyN0bwItqa9 Rq2DzcDdb79znuQ1AwruLYFwFlCJlG7ArsO/sbIKvRxKg0y7W5KwBVO2ICkZL7a2vr8M 0p4OgUdPIJ7z4DMmfblZ2UxMhHWhpRS36zwbw= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to :references:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=UUJY8C2R1UDrN9sVA9Df9NEy0bvM49t/SSGj3bqxYIA=; b=JvfOE3efF2onikBCRqh2l1NRQQjFjJTeX1QKAEZZuF1v87HPIm3UGkG4aC3FGydwWg LZFjJWbuOIGHQcahZvSR131Nq/Yqh3hWYmDnqmVBHcgWy05TG2vSdQ7dNvBonlhRgAqv NT84XS+WZyvH+rVV/74WKAhrenMIo+6vMHV+YuCKwwj3wkXlk9OqtHEC6sfoyAogrfPm go2M7G9GFY8eNZdZ/S0Gr7feg5F0svb/Hl5QFi5knXPB2s96fr5OxuffeZR2Ip4FmCbp i92XW3OmsUG1UgAgOQQTZ97QJEnBkTsNf4Y+QnUH5eavFyffc9Xq3VjvfT16JOBTD5GA R7yw== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAVKI54O7mR6M73zBuDMVS2/6IfoDXojOyd7t+RQ9iiHOU04aAXU RgsdRUUNejxnnDsQfCCvo8meDQ== X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqyclxT5JoQSvi7XSMZMqIl7nPTvJKywUFXfL73GfTko0ecOAss5ATHTnj7+cNjZej2o7vrvgw== X-Received: by 2002:a17:90a:c790:: with SMTP id gn16mr2482321pjb.76.1576280769888; Fri, 13 Dec 2019 15:46:09 -0800 (PST) Received: from tictac2.mtv.corp.google.com ([2620:15c:202:1:24fa:e766:52c9:e3b2]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id z19sm12282905pfn.49.2019.12.13.15.46.08 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Fri, 13 Dec 2019 15:46:09 -0800 (PST) From: Douglas Anderson To: Andrzej Hajda , Neil Armstrong Cc: robdclark@chromium.org, linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, seanpaul@chromium.org, bjorn.andersson@linaro.org, Douglas Anderson , Jonas Karlman , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, David Airlie , Jernej Skrabec , Laurent Pinchart , Daniel Vetter Subject: [PATCH 5/9] drm/bridge: ti-sn65dsi86: Read num lanes from the DP sink Date: Fri, 13 Dec 2019 15:45:26 -0800 Message-Id: <20191213154448.5.Idbd0051d0de53f7e9d18a291ea33011c0854fcc6@changeid> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.24.1.735.g03f4e72817-goog In-Reply-To: <20191213234530.145963-1-dianders@chromium.org> References: <20191213234530.145963-1-dianders@chromium.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: linux-arm-msm-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org At least one panel hooked up to the bridge (AUO B116XAK01) only supports 1 lane of DP. Let's read this information and stop hardcoding 4 DP lanes. Signed-off-by: Douglas Anderson --- drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/ti-sn65dsi86.c | 32 +++++++++++++++++++++++++-- 1 file changed, 30 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/ti-sn65dsi86.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/ti-sn65dsi86.c index d55d19759796..0fc9e97b2d98 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/ti-sn65dsi86.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/ti-sn65dsi86.c @@ -313,8 +313,7 @@ static int ti_sn_bridge_attach(struct drm_bridge *bridge) goto err_dsi_host; } - /* TODO: setting to 4 lanes always for now */ - pdata->dp_lanes = 4; + /* TODO: setting to 4 MIPI lanes always for now */ dsi->lanes = 4; dsi->format = MIPI_DSI_FMT_RGB888; dsi->mode_flags = MIPI_DSI_MODE_VIDEO; @@ -511,12 +510,41 @@ static void ti_sn_bridge_set_video_timings(struct ti_sn_bridge *pdata) usleep_range(10000, 10500); /* 10ms delay recommended by spec */ } +static unsigned int ti_sn_get_max_lanes(struct ti_sn_bridge *pdata) +{ + u8 data; + int ret; + + ret = drm_dp_dpcd_readb(&pdata->aux, DP_MAX_LANE_COUNT, &data); + if (ret != 1) { + DRM_DEV_ERROR(pdata->dev, + "Can't read lane count (%d); assuming 4\n", ret); + return 4; + } + + return data & DP_LANE_COUNT_MASK; +} + static void ti_sn_bridge_enable(struct drm_bridge *bridge) { struct ti_sn_bridge *pdata = bridge_to_ti_sn_bridge(bridge); unsigned int val; int ret; + /* + * Run with the maximum number of lanes that the DP sink supports. + * + * Depending use cases, we might want to revisit this later because: + * - It's plausible that someone may have run fewer lines to the + * sink than the sink actually supports, assuming that the lines + * will just be driven at a higher rate. + * - The DP spec seems to indicate that it's more important to minimize + * the number of lanes than the link rate. + * + * If we do revisit, it would be important to measure the power impact. + */ + pdata->dp_lanes = ti_sn_get_max_lanes(pdata); + /* DSI_A lane config */ val = CHA_DSI_LANES(4 - pdata->dsi->lanes); regmap_update_bits(pdata->regmap, SN_DSI_LANES_REG,