| Message ID | 20200501203311.143934-2-konradybcio@gmail.com (mailing list archive) |
|---|---|
| State | New, archived |
| Headers | show |
| Series | Add msm8939 tsensv0_1 support | expand |
On Sat, May 2, 2020 at 2:03 AM Konrad Dybcio <konradybcio@gmail.com> wrote: > > Signed-off-by: Konrad Dybcio <konradybcio@gmail.com> > --- > drivers/thermal/qcom/tsens-v0_1.c | 142 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++- > drivers/thermal/qcom/tsens.c | 3 + > drivers/thermal/qcom/tsens.h | 2 +- > 3 files changed, 145 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/thermal/qcom/tsens-v0_1.c b/drivers/thermal/qcom/tsens-v0_1.c > index 959a9371d205c..29b95886273b7 100644 > --- a/drivers/thermal/qcom/tsens-v0_1.c > +++ b/drivers/thermal/qcom/tsens-v0_1.c > @@ -48,6 +48,64 @@ > #define MSM8916_CAL_SEL_MASK 0xe0000000 > #define MSM8916_CAL_SEL_SHIFT 29 > > +/* eeprom layout data for 8939 */ > +#define MSM8939_BASE0_MASK 0x000000ff > +#define MSM8939_BASE1_MASK 0xff000000 > +#define MSM8939_BASE0_SHIFT Use 0? > +#define MSM8939_BASE1_SHIFT 24 > + > +#define MSM8939_S0_P1_MASK 0x000001f8 > +#define MSM8939_S1_P1_MASK 0x001f8000 > +#define MSM8939_S2_P1_MASK_0_4 0xf8000000 > +#define MSM8939_S2_P1_MASK_5 0x00000001 > +#define MSM8939_S3_P1_MASK 0x00001f80 > +#define MSM8939_S4_P1_MASK 0x01f80000 > +#define MSM8939_S5_P1_MASK 0x00003f00 > +#define MSM8939_S6_P1_MASK 0x03f00000 > +#define MSM8939_S7_P1_MASK 0x0000003f > +#define MSM8939_S8_P1_MASK 0x0003f000 > +#define MSM8939_S9_P1_MASK 0x07e00000 > + > +#define MSM8939_S0_P2_MASK 0x00007e00 > +#define MSM8939_S1_P2_MASK 0x07e00000 > +#define MSM8939_S2_P2_MASK 0x0000007e > +#define MSM8939_S3_P2_MASK 0x0007e000 > +#define MSM8939_S4_P2_MASK 0x7e000000 > +#define MSM8939_S5_P2_MASK 0x000fc000 > +#define MSM8939_S6_P2_MASK 0xfc000000 > +#define MSM8939_S7_P2_MASK 0x00000fc0 > +#define MSM8939_S8_P2_MASK 0x00fc0000 > +#define MSM8939_S9_P2_MASK_0_4 0xf8000000 > +#define MSM8939_S9_P2_MASK_5 0x00002000 > + > +#define MSM8939_CAL_SEL_MASK 0xc0000000 > +#define MSM8939_CAL_SEL_SHIFT 0 > + > + Get rid of extra line. > +#define MSM8939_S0_P1_SHIFT 3 > +#define MSM8939_S1_P1_SHIFT 15 > +#define MSM8939_S2_P1_SHIFT_0_4 27 > +#define MSM8939_S2_P1_SHIFT_5 5 > +#define MSM8939_S3_P1_SHIFT 7 > +#define MSM8939_S4_P1_SHIFT 19 > +#define MSM8939_S5_P1_SHIFT 8 > +#define MSM8939_S6_P1_SHIFT 20 > +//yes, 7 is missing in downstream Use C style comments. > +#define MSM8939_S8_P1_SHIFT 12 > +#define MSM8939_S9_P1_SHIFT 21 > + > +#define MSM8939_S0_P2_SHIFT 9 > +#define MSM8939_S1_P2_SHIFT 21 > +#define MSM8939_S2_P2_SHIFT 1 > +#define MSM8939_S3_P2_SHIFT 13 > +#define MSM8939_S4_P2_SHIFT 25 > +#define MSM8939_S5_P2_SHIFT 14 > +#define MSM8939_S6_P2_SHIFT 26 > +#define MSM8939_S7_P2_SHIFT 6 > +#define MSM8939_S8_P2_SHIFT 18 > +#define MSM8939_S9_P2_SHIFT_0_4 27 > +#define MSM8939_S9_P2_SHIFT_5 8 > + > /* eeprom layout data for 8974 */ > #define BASE1_MASK 0xff > #define S0_P1_MASK 0x3f00 > @@ -189,6 +247,73 @@ static int calibrate_8916(struct tsens_priv *priv) > return 0; > } > > +static int calibrate_8939(struct tsens_priv *priv) > +{ > + int base0 = 0, base1 = 0, i; > + u32 p1[11], p2[11]; > + int mode = 0; > + u32 *qfprom_cdata, *qfprom_csel; > + > + qfprom_cdata = (u32 *)qfprom_read(priv->dev, "calib"); > + if (IS_ERR(qfprom_cdata)) > + return PTR_ERR(qfprom_cdata); > + > + qfprom_csel = (u32 *)qfprom_read(priv->dev, "calib_sel"); > + if (IS_ERR(qfprom_csel)) { > + kfree(qfprom_cdata); > + return PTR_ERR(qfprom_csel); > + } > + > + mode = (qfprom_csel[0] & MSM8939_CAL_SEL_MASK) >> MSM8939_CAL_SEL_SHIFT; > + dev_dbg(priv->dev, "calibration mode is %d\n", mode); Add an extra line here. > + switch (mode) { > + case TWO_PT_CALIB: > + base1 = (qfprom_cdata[1] & MSM8939_BASE1_MASK) >> MSM8939_BASE1_SHIFT; > + p2[0] = (qfprom_cdata[0] & MSM8939_S0_P2_MASK) >> MSM8939_S0_P2_SHIFT; > + p2[1] = (qfprom_cdata[0] & MSM8939_S1_P2_MASK) >> MSM8939_S1_P2_SHIFT; > + p2[2] = (qfprom_cdata[1] & MSM8939_S2_P2_MASK) >> MSM8939_S2_P2_SHIFT; > + p2[3] = (qfprom_cdata[1] & MSM8939_S3_P2_MASK) >> MSM8939_S3_P2_SHIFT; > + p2[4] = (qfprom_cdata[1] & MSM8939_S4_P2_MASK) >> MSM8939_S4_P2_SHIFT; > + p2[5] = (qfprom_cdata[1] & MSM8939_S5_P2_MASK) >> MSM8939_S5_P2_SHIFT; > + p2[6] = (qfprom_cdata[1] & MSM8939_S6_P2_MASK) >> MSM8939_S6_P2_SHIFT; > + p2[7] = (qfprom_cdata[1] & MSM8939_S7_P2_MASK) >> MSM8939_S7_P2_SHIFT; > + p2[8] = (qfprom_cdata[1] & MSM8939_S8_P2_MASK) >> MSM8939_S8_P2_SHIFT; > + p2[9] = (qfprom_cdata[1] & MSM8939_S9_P2_MASK_0_4) >> MSM8939_S9_P2_SHIFT_0_4; > + p2[10] = (qfprom_cdata[1] & MSM8939_S9_P2_MASK_5) >> MSM8939_S9_P2_SHIFT_5; > + for (i = 0; i < priv->num_sensors; i++) > + p2[i] = ((base1 + p2[i]) << 3); > + /* Fall through */ > + case ONE_PT_CALIB2: > + base0 = (qfprom_cdata[0] & MSM8939_BASE0_MASK); > + p1[0] = (qfprom_cdata[0] & MSM8939_S0_P1_MASK) >> MSM8939_S0_P1_SHIFT; > + p1[1] = (qfprom_cdata[0] & MSM8939_S1_P1_MASK) >> MSM8939_S1_P1_SHIFT; > + p1[2] = (qfprom_cdata[0] & MSM8939_S2_P1_MASK_0_4) >> MSM8939_S2_P1_SHIFT_0_4; > + p1[3] = (qfprom_cdata[0] & MSM8939_S2_P1_MASK_5) >> MSM8939_S2_P1_SHIFT_5; > + p1[4] = (qfprom_cdata[1] & MSM8939_S3_P1_MASK) >> MSM8939_S3_P1_SHIFT; > + p1[5] = (qfprom_cdata[1] & MSM8939_S4_P1_MASK) >> MSM8939_S4_P1_SHIFT; > + p1[6] = (qfprom_cdata[1] & MSM8939_S5_P1_MASK) >> MSM8939_S5_P1_SHIFT; > + p1[7] = (qfprom_cdata[1] & MSM8939_S6_P1_MASK) >> MSM8939_S6_P1_SHIFT; > + //yes, 7 is missing in downstream Use C comment style. Might this be a bug? > + p1[8] = (qfprom_cdata[1] & MSM8939_S8_P1_MASK) >> MSM8939_S8_P1_SHIFT; > + p1[9] = (qfprom_cdata[1] & MSM8939_S9_P1_MASK) >> MSM8939_S9_P1_SHIFT; > + for (i = 0; i < priv->num_sensors; i++) > + p1[i] = (((base0) + p1[i]) << 3); > + break; > + default: > + for (i = 0; i < priv->num_sensors; i++) { > + p1[i] = 500; > + p2[i] = 780; > + } > + break; > + } > + > + compute_intercept_slope(priv, p1, p2, mode); > + kfree(qfprom_cdata); > + kfree(qfprom_csel); > + > + return 0; > +} > + > static int calibrate_8974(struct tsens_priv *priv) > { > int base1 = 0, base2 = 0, i; > @@ -325,7 +450,7 @@ static int calibrate_8974(struct tsens_priv *priv) > return 0; > } > > -/* v0.1: 8916, 8974 */ > +/* v0.1: 8916, 8939, 8974 */ > > static struct tsens_features tsens_v0_1_feat = { > .ver_major = VER_0_1, > @@ -386,6 +511,21 @@ struct tsens_plat_data data_8916 = { > .fields = tsens_v0_1_regfields, > }; > > +static const struct tsens_ops ops_8939 = { > + .init = init_common, > + .calibrate = calibrate_8939, > + .get_temp = get_temp_common, > +}; > + > +struct tsens_plat_data data_8939 = { > + .num_sensors = 10, I think 8939 has 11 sensors. Can you confirm? > + .ops = &ops_8939, > + .hw_ids = (unsigned int []){0, 1, 2, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9 }, And this should be equal to the number of sensors > + > + .feat = &tsens_v0_1_feat, > + .fields = tsens_v0_1_regfields, > +}; > + > static const struct tsens_ops ops_8974 = { > .init = init_common, > .calibrate = calibrate_8974, > diff --git a/drivers/thermal/qcom/tsens.c b/drivers/thermal/qcom/tsens.c > index 2f77d235cf735..f654057e96ae1 100644 > --- a/drivers/thermal/qcom/tsens.c > +++ b/drivers/thermal/qcom/tsens.c > @@ -59,6 +59,9 @@ static const struct of_device_id tsens_table[] = { > { > .compatible = "qcom,msm8916-tsens", > .data = &data_8916, > + }, { > + .compatible = "qcom,msm8939-tsens", > + .data = &data_8939, > }, { > .compatible = "qcom,msm8974-tsens", > .data = &data_8974, > diff --git a/drivers/thermal/qcom/tsens.h b/drivers/thermal/qcom/tsens.h > index 502acf0e68285..403b15546f648 100644 > --- a/drivers/thermal/qcom/tsens.h > +++ b/drivers/thermal/qcom/tsens.h > @@ -590,7 +590,7 @@ irqreturn_t tsens_critical_irq_thread(int irq, void *data); > extern struct tsens_plat_data data_8960; > > /* TSENS v0.1 targets */ > -extern struct tsens_plat_data data_8916, data_8974; > +extern struct tsens_plat_data data_8916, data_8939, data_8974; > > /* TSENS v1 targets */ > extern struct tsens_plat_data data_tsens_v1, data_8976; > -- > 2.26.1 >
Thanks for your review. I'll hopefully send a v2 later today. As for the sensor count, I don't know how many there actually are. I'm an independent dev and don't have access to any documentation and I'm solely basing on what I find in downstream, and I think it's 10, unless mainline expects the _0_4 and _5 to be counted separately.. [1] I will also make sure to test it again before sending and will give you the results in the v2 cover letter. [1] https://github.com/konradybcio/android_kernel_asus_msm8916-1/blob/minimal/drivers/thermal/msm8974-tsens.c#L396 pon., 4 maj 2020 o 08:31 Amit Kucheria <amit.kucheria@linaro.org> napisał(a): > > On Sat, May 2, 2020 at 2:03 AM Konrad Dybcio <konradybcio@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > Signed-off-by: Konrad Dybcio <konradybcio@gmail.com> > > --- > > drivers/thermal/qcom/tsens-v0_1.c | 142 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++- > > drivers/thermal/qcom/tsens.c | 3 + > > drivers/thermal/qcom/tsens.h | 2 +- > > 3 files changed, 145 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > > > diff --git a/drivers/thermal/qcom/tsens-v0_1.c b/drivers/thermal/qcom/tsens-v0_1.c > > index 959a9371d205c..29b95886273b7 100644 > > --- a/drivers/thermal/qcom/tsens-v0_1.c > > +++ b/drivers/thermal/qcom/tsens-v0_1.c > > @@ -48,6 +48,64 @@ > > #define MSM8916_CAL_SEL_MASK 0xe0000000 > > #define MSM8916_CAL_SEL_SHIFT 29 > > > > +/* eeprom layout data for 8939 */ > > +#define MSM8939_BASE0_MASK 0x000000ff > > +#define MSM8939_BASE1_MASK 0xff000000 > > +#define MSM8939_BASE0_SHIFT > > Use 0? > > > +#define MSM8939_BASE1_SHIFT 24 > > + > > +#define MSM8939_S0_P1_MASK 0x000001f8 > > +#define MSM8939_S1_P1_MASK 0x001f8000 > > +#define MSM8939_S2_P1_MASK_0_4 0xf8000000 > > +#define MSM8939_S2_P1_MASK_5 0x00000001 > > +#define MSM8939_S3_P1_MASK 0x00001f80 > > +#define MSM8939_S4_P1_MASK 0x01f80000 > > +#define MSM8939_S5_P1_MASK 0x00003f00 > > +#define MSM8939_S6_P1_MASK 0x03f00000 > > +#define MSM8939_S7_P1_MASK 0x0000003f > > +#define MSM8939_S8_P1_MASK 0x0003f000 > > +#define MSM8939_S9_P1_MASK 0x07e00000 > > + > > +#define MSM8939_S0_P2_MASK 0x00007e00 > > +#define MSM8939_S1_P2_MASK 0x07e00000 > > +#define MSM8939_S2_P2_MASK 0x0000007e > > +#define MSM8939_S3_P2_MASK 0x0007e000 > > +#define MSM8939_S4_P2_MASK 0x7e000000 > > +#define MSM8939_S5_P2_MASK 0x000fc000 > > +#define MSM8939_S6_P2_MASK 0xfc000000 > > +#define MSM8939_S7_P2_MASK 0x00000fc0 > > +#define MSM8939_S8_P2_MASK 0x00fc0000 > > +#define MSM8939_S9_P2_MASK_0_4 0xf8000000 > > +#define MSM8939_S9_P2_MASK_5 0x00002000 > > + > > +#define MSM8939_CAL_SEL_MASK 0xc0000000 > > +#define MSM8939_CAL_SEL_SHIFT 0 > > + > > + > > Get rid of extra line. > > > +#define MSM8939_S0_P1_SHIFT 3 > > +#define MSM8939_S1_P1_SHIFT 15 > > +#define MSM8939_S2_P1_SHIFT_0_4 27 > > +#define MSM8939_S2_P1_SHIFT_5 5 > > +#define MSM8939_S3_P1_SHIFT 7 > > +#define MSM8939_S4_P1_SHIFT 19 > > +#define MSM8939_S5_P1_SHIFT 8 > > +#define MSM8939_S6_P1_SHIFT 20 > > +//yes, 7 is missing in downstream > > Use C style comments. > > > +#define MSM8939_S8_P1_SHIFT 12 > > +#define MSM8939_S9_P1_SHIFT 21 > > + > > +#define MSM8939_S0_P2_SHIFT 9 > > +#define MSM8939_S1_P2_SHIFT 21 > > +#define MSM8939_S2_P2_SHIFT 1 > > +#define MSM8939_S3_P2_SHIFT 13 > > +#define MSM8939_S4_P2_SHIFT 25 > > +#define MSM8939_S5_P2_SHIFT 14 > > +#define MSM8939_S6_P2_SHIFT 26 > > +#define MSM8939_S7_P2_SHIFT 6 > > +#define MSM8939_S8_P2_SHIFT 18 > > +#define MSM8939_S9_P2_SHIFT_0_4 27 > > +#define MSM8939_S9_P2_SHIFT_5 8 > > + > > /* eeprom layout data for 8974 */ > > #define BASE1_MASK 0xff > > #define S0_P1_MASK 0x3f00 > > @@ -189,6 +247,73 @@ static int calibrate_8916(struct tsens_priv *priv) > > return 0; > > } > > > > +static int calibrate_8939(struct tsens_priv *priv) > > +{ > > + int base0 = 0, base1 = 0, i; > > + u32 p1[11], p2[11]; > > + int mode = 0; > > + u32 *qfprom_cdata, *qfprom_csel; > > + > > + qfprom_cdata = (u32 *)qfprom_read(priv->dev, "calib"); > > + if (IS_ERR(qfprom_cdata)) > > + return PTR_ERR(qfprom_cdata); > > + > > + qfprom_csel = (u32 *)qfprom_read(priv->dev, "calib_sel"); > > + if (IS_ERR(qfprom_csel)) { > > + kfree(qfprom_cdata); > > + return PTR_ERR(qfprom_csel); > > + } > > + > > + mode = (qfprom_csel[0] & MSM8939_CAL_SEL_MASK) >> MSM8939_CAL_SEL_SHIFT; > > + dev_dbg(priv->dev, "calibration mode is %d\n", mode); > > Add an extra line here. > > > + switch (mode) { > > + case TWO_PT_CALIB: > > + base1 = (qfprom_cdata[1] & MSM8939_BASE1_MASK) >> MSM8939_BASE1_SHIFT; > > + p2[0] = (qfprom_cdata[0] & MSM8939_S0_P2_MASK) >> MSM8939_S0_P2_SHIFT; > > + p2[1] = (qfprom_cdata[0] & MSM8939_S1_P2_MASK) >> MSM8939_S1_P2_SHIFT; > > + p2[2] = (qfprom_cdata[1] & MSM8939_S2_P2_MASK) >> MSM8939_S2_P2_SHIFT; > > + p2[3] = (qfprom_cdata[1] & MSM8939_S3_P2_MASK) >> MSM8939_S3_P2_SHIFT; > > + p2[4] = (qfprom_cdata[1] & MSM8939_S4_P2_MASK) >> MSM8939_S4_P2_SHIFT; > > + p2[5] = (qfprom_cdata[1] & MSM8939_S5_P2_MASK) >> MSM8939_S5_P2_SHIFT; > > + p2[6] = (qfprom_cdata[1] & MSM8939_S6_P2_MASK) >> MSM8939_S6_P2_SHIFT; > > + p2[7] = (qfprom_cdata[1] & MSM8939_S7_P2_MASK) >> MSM8939_S7_P2_SHIFT; > > + p2[8] = (qfprom_cdata[1] & MSM8939_S8_P2_MASK) >> MSM8939_S8_P2_SHIFT; > > + p2[9] = (qfprom_cdata[1] & MSM8939_S9_P2_MASK_0_4) >> MSM8939_S9_P2_SHIFT_0_4; > > + p2[10] = (qfprom_cdata[1] & MSM8939_S9_P2_MASK_5) >> MSM8939_S9_P2_SHIFT_5; > > + for (i = 0; i < priv->num_sensors; i++) > > + p2[i] = ((base1 + p2[i]) << 3); > > + /* Fall through */ > > + case ONE_PT_CALIB2: > > + base0 = (qfprom_cdata[0] & MSM8939_BASE0_MASK); > > + p1[0] = (qfprom_cdata[0] & MSM8939_S0_P1_MASK) >> MSM8939_S0_P1_SHIFT; > > + p1[1] = (qfprom_cdata[0] & MSM8939_S1_P1_MASK) >> MSM8939_S1_P1_SHIFT; > > + p1[2] = (qfprom_cdata[0] & MSM8939_S2_P1_MASK_0_4) >> MSM8939_S2_P1_SHIFT_0_4; > > + p1[3] = (qfprom_cdata[0] & MSM8939_S2_P1_MASK_5) >> MSM8939_S2_P1_SHIFT_5; > > + p1[4] = (qfprom_cdata[1] & MSM8939_S3_P1_MASK) >> MSM8939_S3_P1_SHIFT; > > + p1[5] = (qfprom_cdata[1] & MSM8939_S4_P1_MASK) >> MSM8939_S4_P1_SHIFT; > > + p1[6] = (qfprom_cdata[1] & MSM8939_S5_P1_MASK) >> MSM8939_S5_P1_SHIFT; > > + p1[7] = (qfprom_cdata[1] & MSM8939_S6_P1_MASK) >> MSM8939_S6_P1_SHIFT; > > + //yes, 7 is missing in downstream > > Use C comment style. Might this be a bug? > > > + p1[8] = (qfprom_cdata[1] & MSM8939_S8_P1_MASK) >> MSM8939_S8_P1_SHIFT; > > + p1[9] = (qfprom_cdata[1] & MSM8939_S9_P1_MASK) >> MSM8939_S9_P1_SHIFT; > > + for (i = 0; i < priv->num_sensors; i++) > > + p1[i] = (((base0) + p1[i]) << 3); > > + break; > > + default: > > + for (i = 0; i < priv->num_sensors; i++) { > > + p1[i] = 500; > > + p2[i] = 780; > > + } > > + break; > > + } > > + > > + compute_intercept_slope(priv, p1, p2, mode); > > + kfree(qfprom_cdata); > > + kfree(qfprom_csel); > > + > > + return 0; > > +} > > + > > static int calibrate_8974(struct tsens_priv *priv) > > { > > int base1 = 0, base2 = 0, i; > > @@ -325,7 +450,7 @@ static int calibrate_8974(struct tsens_priv *priv) > > return 0; > > } > > > > -/* v0.1: 8916, 8974 */ > > +/* v0.1: 8916, 8939, 8974 */ > > > > static struct tsens_features tsens_v0_1_feat = { > > .ver_major = VER_0_1, > > @@ -386,6 +511,21 @@ struct tsens_plat_data data_8916 = { > > .fields = tsens_v0_1_regfields, > > }; > > > > +static const struct tsens_ops ops_8939 = { > > + .init = init_common, > > + .calibrate = calibrate_8939, > > + .get_temp = get_temp_common, > > +}; > > + > > +struct tsens_plat_data data_8939 = { > > + .num_sensors = 10, > > I think 8939 has 11 sensors. Can you confirm? > > > + .ops = &ops_8939, > > + .hw_ids = (unsigned int []){0, 1, 2, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9 }, > > And this should be equal to the number of sensors > > > > + > > + .feat = &tsens_v0_1_feat, > > + .fields = tsens_v0_1_regfields, > > +}; > > + > > static const struct tsens_ops ops_8974 = { > > .init = init_common, > > .calibrate = calibrate_8974, > > diff --git a/drivers/thermal/qcom/tsens.c b/drivers/thermal/qcom/tsens.c > > index 2f77d235cf735..f654057e96ae1 100644 > > --- a/drivers/thermal/qcom/tsens.c > > +++ b/drivers/thermal/qcom/tsens.c > > @@ -59,6 +59,9 @@ static const struct of_device_id tsens_table[] = { > > { > > .compatible = "qcom,msm8916-tsens", > > .data = &data_8916, > > + }, { > > + .compatible = "qcom,msm8939-tsens", > > + .data = &data_8939, > > }, { > > .compatible = "qcom,msm8974-tsens", > > .data = &data_8974, > > diff --git a/drivers/thermal/qcom/tsens.h b/drivers/thermal/qcom/tsens.h > > index 502acf0e68285..403b15546f648 100644 > > --- a/drivers/thermal/qcom/tsens.h > > +++ b/drivers/thermal/qcom/tsens.h > > @@ -590,7 +590,7 @@ irqreturn_t tsens_critical_irq_thread(int irq, void *data); > > extern struct tsens_plat_data data_8960; > > > > /* TSENS v0.1 targets */ > > -extern struct tsens_plat_data data_8916, data_8974; > > +extern struct tsens_plat_data data_8916, data_8939, data_8974; > > > > /* TSENS v1 targets */ > > extern struct tsens_plat_data data_tsens_v1, data_8976; > > -- > > 2.26.1 > >
On Fri, May 01, 2020 at 10:33:10PM +0200, Konrad Dybcio wrote: > Signed-off-by: Konrad Dybcio <konradybcio@gmail.com> For the record, I'm working my version of msm8939 tsens driver support, and I would highlight the things that differ from this patch. > --- > drivers/thermal/qcom/tsens-v0_1.c | 142 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++- > drivers/thermal/qcom/tsens.c | 3 + > drivers/thermal/qcom/tsens.h | 2 +- > 3 files changed, 145 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/thermal/qcom/tsens-v0_1.c b/drivers/thermal/qcom/tsens-v0_1.c > index 959a9371d205c..29b95886273b7 100644 > --- a/drivers/thermal/qcom/tsens-v0_1.c > +++ b/drivers/thermal/qcom/tsens-v0_1.c > @@ -48,6 +48,64 @@ > #define MSM8916_CAL_SEL_MASK 0xe0000000 > #define MSM8916_CAL_SEL_SHIFT 29 > > +/* eeprom layout data for 8939 */ > +#define MSM8939_BASE0_MASK 0x000000ff Tabs rather than spaces are used for indentation. > +#define MSM8939_BASE1_MASK 0xff000000 > +#define MSM8939_BASE0_SHIFT This shift is 0. > +#define MSM8939_BASE1_SHIFT 24 > + > +#define MSM8939_S0_P1_MASK 0x000001f8 > +#define MSM8939_S1_P1_MASK 0x001f8000 > +#define MSM8939_S2_P1_MASK_0_4 0xf8000000 > +#define MSM8939_S2_P1_MASK_5 0x00000001 This mask define is contradicting to MSM8939_S2_P1_SHIFT_5, and needs to be confirmed. > +#define MSM8939_S3_P1_MASK 0x00001f80 > +#define MSM8939_S4_P1_MASK 0x01f80000 > +#define MSM8939_S5_P1_MASK 0x00003f00 > +#define MSM8939_S6_P1_MASK 0x03f00000 > +#define MSM8939_S7_P1_MASK 0x0000003f > +#define MSM8939_S8_P1_MASK 0x0003f000 > +#define MSM8939_S9_P1_MASK 0x07e00000 > + > +#define MSM8939_S0_P2_MASK 0x00007e00 > +#define MSM8939_S1_P2_MASK 0x07e00000 > +#define MSM8939_S2_P2_MASK 0x0000007e > +#define MSM8939_S3_P2_MASK 0x0007e000 > +#define MSM8939_S4_P2_MASK 0x7e000000 > +#define MSM8939_S5_P2_MASK 0x000fc000 > +#define MSM8939_S6_P2_MASK 0xfc000000 > +#define MSM8939_S7_P2_MASK 0x00000fc0 > +#define MSM8939_S8_P2_MASK 0x00fc0000 > +#define MSM8939_S9_P2_MASK_0_4 0xf8000000 > +#define MSM8939_S9_P2_MASK_5 0x00002000 It's contradicting to MSM8939_S9_P2_SHIFT_5, and needs to be confirmed. > + > +#define MSM8939_CAL_SEL_MASK 0xc0000000 Per downstream kernel, this mask is 0x7. https://source.codeaurora.org/quic/la/kernel/msm-3.10/tree/drivers/thermal/msm8974-tsens.c?h=LA.BR.1.2.9.1_rb1.5#n370 > +#define MSM8939_CAL_SEL_SHIFT 0 > + > + > +#define MSM8939_S0_P1_SHIFT 3 > +#define MSM8939_S1_P1_SHIFT 15 > +#define MSM8939_S2_P1_SHIFT_0_4 27 > +#define MSM8939_S2_P1_SHIFT_5 5 > +#define MSM8939_S3_P1_SHIFT 7 > +#define MSM8939_S4_P1_SHIFT 19 > +#define MSM8939_S5_P1_SHIFT 8 > +#define MSM8939_S6_P1_SHIFT 20 > +//yes, 7 is missing in downstream The shift is not missing but just 0. > +#define MSM8939_S8_P1_SHIFT 12 > +#define MSM8939_S9_P1_SHIFT 21 > + > +#define MSM8939_S0_P2_SHIFT 9 > +#define MSM8939_S1_P2_SHIFT 21 > +#define MSM8939_S2_P2_SHIFT 1 > +#define MSM8939_S3_P2_SHIFT 13 > +#define MSM8939_S4_P2_SHIFT 25 > +#define MSM8939_S5_P2_SHIFT 14 > +#define MSM8939_S6_P2_SHIFT 26 > +#define MSM8939_S7_P2_SHIFT 6 > +#define MSM8939_S8_P2_SHIFT 18 > +#define MSM8939_S9_P2_SHIFT_0_4 27 > +#define MSM8939_S9_P2_SHIFT_5 8 > + > /* eeprom layout data for 8974 */ > #define BASE1_MASK 0xff > #define S0_P1_MASK 0x3f00 > @@ -189,6 +247,73 @@ static int calibrate_8916(struct tsens_priv *priv) > return 0; > } > > +static int calibrate_8939(struct tsens_priv *priv) > +{ > + int base0 = 0, base1 = 0, i; > + u32 p1[11], p2[11]; MSM8939 gets 10 sensors, so the arrays should be [10]. > + int mode = 0; > + u32 *qfprom_cdata, *qfprom_csel; > + > + qfprom_cdata = (u32 *)qfprom_read(priv->dev, "calib"); > + if (IS_ERR(qfprom_cdata)) > + return PTR_ERR(qfprom_cdata); > + > + qfprom_csel = (u32 *)qfprom_read(priv->dev, "calib_sel"); > + if (IS_ERR(qfprom_csel)) { > + kfree(qfprom_cdata); > + return PTR_ERR(qfprom_csel); > + } 'calib_sel' is not separate from 'calib' bits on MSM8939. I chose to read nvmem out as one go and map them to calibration data as below, per downstream kernel. /* Mapping between qfprom nvmem and calibration data */ cdata[0] = qfprom_cdata[12]; cdata[1] = qfprom_cdata[13]; cdata[2] = qfprom_cdata[0]; cdata[3] = qfprom_cdata[1]; cdata[4] = qfprom_cdata[22]; cdata[5] = qfprom_cdata[21]; mode = (cdata[0] & MSM8939_CAL_SEL_MASK) >> MSM8939_CAL_SEL_SHIFT; https://source.codeaurora.org/quic/la/kernel/msm-3.10/tree/drivers/thermal/msm8974-tsens.c?h=LA.BR.1.2.9.1_rb1.5#n1286 We should support MSM8939 v3, as that's the mass production revision. > + > + mode = (qfprom_csel[0] & MSM8939_CAL_SEL_MASK) >> MSM8939_CAL_SEL_SHIFT; > + dev_dbg(priv->dev, "calibration mode is %d\n", mode); > + switch (mode) { > + case TWO_PT_CALIB: > + base1 = (qfprom_cdata[1] & MSM8939_BASE1_MASK) >> MSM8939_BASE1_SHIFT; > + p2[0] = (qfprom_cdata[0] & MSM8939_S0_P2_MASK) >> MSM8939_S0_P2_SHIFT; > + p2[1] = (qfprom_cdata[0] & MSM8939_S1_P2_MASK) >> MSM8939_S1_P2_SHIFT; > + p2[2] = (qfprom_cdata[1] & MSM8939_S2_P2_MASK) >> MSM8939_S2_P2_SHIFT; > + p2[3] = (qfprom_cdata[1] & MSM8939_S3_P2_MASK) >> MSM8939_S3_P2_SHIFT; > + p2[4] = (qfprom_cdata[1] & MSM8939_S4_P2_MASK) >> MSM8939_S4_P2_SHIFT; > + p2[5] = (qfprom_cdata[1] & MSM8939_S5_P2_MASK) >> MSM8939_S5_P2_SHIFT; > + p2[6] = (qfprom_cdata[1] & MSM8939_S6_P2_MASK) >> MSM8939_S6_P2_SHIFT; > + p2[7] = (qfprom_cdata[1] & MSM8939_S7_P2_MASK) >> MSM8939_S7_P2_SHIFT; > + p2[8] = (qfprom_cdata[1] & MSM8939_S8_P2_MASK) >> MSM8939_S8_P2_SHIFT; > + p2[9] = (qfprom_cdata[1] & MSM8939_S9_P2_MASK_0_4) >> MSM8939_S9_P2_SHIFT_0_4; > + p2[10] = (qfprom_cdata[1] & MSM8939_S9_P2_MASK_5) >> MSM8939_S9_P2_SHIFT_5; These do not really match downstream kernel. My version look like: base1 = (cdata[3] & MSM8939_BASE1_MASK) >> MSM8939_BASE1_SHIFT; p2[0] = (cdata[0] & MSM8939_S0_P2_MASK) >> MSM8939_S0_P2_SHIFT; p2[1] = (cdata[0] & MSM8939_S1_P2_MASK) >> MSM8939_S1_P2_SHIFT; p2[2] = (cdata[1] & MSM8939_S2_P2_MASK) >> MSM8939_S2_P2_SHIFT; p2[3] = (cdata[1] & MSM8939_S3_P2_MASK) >> MSM8939_S3_P2_SHIFT; p2[4] = (cdata[1] & MSM8939_S4_P2_MASK) >> MSM8939_S4_P2_SHIFT; p2[5] = (cdata[2] & MSM8939_S5_P2_MASK) >> MSM8939_S5_P2_SHIFT; p2[6] = (cdata[2] & MSM8939_S6_P2_MASK) >> MSM8939_S6_P2_SHIFT; p2[7] = (cdata[3] & MSM8939_S7_P2_MASK) >> MSM8939_S7_P2_SHIFT; p2[8] = (cdata[3] & MSM8939_S8_P2_MASK) >> MSM8939_S8_P2_SHIFT; p2[9] = (cdata[4] & MSM8939_S9_P2_MASK_0_4) >> MSM8939_S9_P2_SHIFT_0_4; p2[9] |= (cdata[5] & MSM8939_S9_P2_MASK_5) >> MSM8939_S9_P2_SHIFT_5; > + for (i = 0; i < priv->num_sensors; i++) > + p2[i] = ((base1 + p2[i]) << 3); The left shift should be 2 per downstream kernel. https://source.codeaurora.org/quic/la/kernel/msm-3.10/tree/drivers/thermal/msm8974-tsens.c?h=LA.BR.1.2.9.1_rb1.5#n1407 > + /* Fall through */ > + case ONE_PT_CALIB2: > + base0 = (qfprom_cdata[0] & MSM8939_BASE0_MASK); > + p1[0] = (qfprom_cdata[0] & MSM8939_S0_P1_MASK) >> MSM8939_S0_P1_SHIFT; > + p1[1] = (qfprom_cdata[0] & MSM8939_S1_P1_MASK) >> MSM8939_S1_P1_SHIFT; > + p1[2] = (qfprom_cdata[0] & MSM8939_S2_P1_MASK_0_4) >> MSM8939_S2_P1_SHIFT_0_4; > + p1[3] = (qfprom_cdata[0] & MSM8939_S2_P1_MASK_5) >> MSM8939_S2_P1_SHIFT_5; > + p1[4] = (qfprom_cdata[1] & MSM8939_S3_P1_MASK) >> MSM8939_S3_P1_SHIFT; > + p1[5] = (qfprom_cdata[1] & MSM8939_S4_P1_MASK) >> MSM8939_S4_P1_SHIFT; > + p1[6] = (qfprom_cdata[1] & MSM8939_S5_P1_MASK) >> MSM8939_S5_P1_SHIFT; > + p1[7] = (qfprom_cdata[1] & MSM8939_S6_P1_MASK) >> MSM8939_S6_P1_SHIFT; > + //yes, 7 is missing in downstream Not really. https://source.codeaurora.org/quic/la/kernel/msm-3.10/tree/drivers/thermal/msm8974-tsens.c?h=LA.BR.1.2.9.1_rb1.5#n1331 > + p1[8] = (qfprom_cdata[1] & MSM8939_S8_P1_MASK) >> MSM8939_S8_P1_SHIFT; > + p1[9] = (qfprom_cdata[1] & MSM8939_S9_P1_MASK) >> MSM8939_S9_P1_SHIFT; > + for (i = 0; i < priv->num_sensors; i++) > + p1[i] = (((base0) + p1[i]) << 3); > + break; > + default: > + for (i = 0; i < priv->num_sensors; i++) { > + p1[i] = 500; > + p2[i] = 780; > + } > + break; > + } > + > + compute_intercept_slope(priv, p1, p2, mode); > + kfree(qfprom_cdata); > + kfree(qfprom_csel); > + > + return 0; > +} > + > static int calibrate_8974(struct tsens_priv *priv) > { > int base1 = 0, base2 = 0, i; > @@ -325,7 +450,7 @@ static int calibrate_8974(struct tsens_priv *priv) > return 0; > } > > -/* v0.1: 8916, 8974 */ > +/* v0.1: 8916, 8939, 8974 */ > > static struct tsens_features tsens_v0_1_feat = { > .ver_major = VER_0_1, > @@ -386,6 +511,21 @@ struct tsens_plat_data data_8916 = { > .fields = tsens_v0_1_regfields, > }; > > +static const struct tsens_ops ops_8939 = { > + .init = init_common, > + .calibrate = calibrate_8939, > + .get_temp = get_temp_common, > +}; > + > +struct tsens_plat_data data_8939 = { > + .num_sensors = 10, > + .ops = &ops_8939, > + .hw_ids = (unsigned int []){0, 1, 2, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9 }, Should be { 0, 1, 2, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10 }. https://source.codeaurora.org/quic/la/kernel/msm-3.10/tree/arch/arm/boot/dts/qcom/msm8939-v3.0.dtsi?h=LA.BR.1.2.9.1_rb1.5#n670 Shawn > + > + .feat = &tsens_v0_1_feat, > + .fields = tsens_v0_1_regfields, > +}; > + > static const struct tsens_ops ops_8974 = { > .init = init_common, > .calibrate = calibrate_8974, > diff --git a/drivers/thermal/qcom/tsens.c b/drivers/thermal/qcom/tsens.c > index 2f77d235cf735..f654057e96ae1 100644 > --- a/drivers/thermal/qcom/tsens.c > +++ b/drivers/thermal/qcom/tsens.c > @@ -59,6 +59,9 @@ static const struct of_device_id tsens_table[] = { > { > .compatible = "qcom,msm8916-tsens", > .data = &data_8916, > + }, { > + .compatible = "qcom,msm8939-tsens", > + .data = &data_8939, > }, { > .compatible = "qcom,msm8974-tsens", > .data = &data_8974, > diff --git a/drivers/thermal/qcom/tsens.h b/drivers/thermal/qcom/tsens.h > index 502acf0e68285..403b15546f648 100644 > --- a/drivers/thermal/qcom/tsens.h > +++ b/drivers/thermal/qcom/tsens.h > @@ -590,7 +590,7 @@ irqreturn_t tsens_critical_irq_thread(int irq, void *data); > extern struct tsens_plat_data data_8960; > > /* TSENS v0.1 targets */ > -extern struct tsens_plat_data data_8916, data_8974; > +extern struct tsens_plat_data data_8916, data_8939, data_8974; > > /* TSENS v1 targets */ > extern struct tsens_plat_data data_tsens_v1, data_8976; > -- > 2.26.1 >
Hi Shawn, Thanks for your review. >For the record, I'm working my version of msm8939 tsens driver support, >and I would highlight the things that differ from this patch. I would be absolutely happy if you superseded that patch with your one, as I'm currently working on sdm630. Otherwise, thanks for pointing out the stuff I got wrong in the first place. Regards Konrad
diff --git a/drivers/thermal/qcom/tsens-v0_1.c b/drivers/thermal/qcom/tsens-v0_1.c index 959a9371d205c..29b95886273b7 100644 --- a/drivers/thermal/qcom/tsens-v0_1.c +++ b/drivers/thermal/qcom/tsens-v0_1.c @@ -48,6 +48,64 @@ #define MSM8916_CAL_SEL_MASK 0xe0000000 #define MSM8916_CAL_SEL_SHIFT 29 +/* eeprom layout data for 8939 */ +#define MSM8939_BASE0_MASK 0x000000ff +#define MSM8939_BASE1_MASK 0xff000000 +#define MSM8939_BASE0_SHIFT +#define MSM8939_BASE1_SHIFT 24 + +#define MSM8939_S0_P1_MASK 0x000001f8 +#define MSM8939_S1_P1_MASK 0x001f8000 +#define MSM8939_S2_P1_MASK_0_4 0xf8000000 +#define MSM8939_S2_P1_MASK_5 0x00000001 +#define MSM8939_S3_P1_MASK 0x00001f80 +#define MSM8939_S4_P1_MASK 0x01f80000 +#define MSM8939_S5_P1_MASK 0x00003f00 +#define MSM8939_S6_P1_MASK 0x03f00000 +#define MSM8939_S7_P1_MASK 0x0000003f +#define MSM8939_S8_P1_MASK 0x0003f000 +#define MSM8939_S9_P1_MASK 0x07e00000 + +#define MSM8939_S0_P2_MASK 0x00007e00 +#define MSM8939_S1_P2_MASK 0x07e00000 +#define MSM8939_S2_P2_MASK 0x0000007e +#define MSM8939_S3_P2_MASK 0x0007e000 +#define MSM8939_S4_P2_MASK 0x7e000000 +#define MSM8939_S5_P2_MASK 0x000fc000 +#define MSM8939_S6_P2_MASK 0xfc000000 +#define MSM8939_S7_P2_MASK 0x00000fc0 +#define MSM8939_S8_P2_MASK 0x00fc0000 +#define MSM8939_S9_P2_MASK_0_4 0xf8000000 +#define MSM8939_S9_P2_MASK_5 0x00002000 + +#define MSM8939_CAL_SEL_MASK 0xc0000000 +#define MSM8939_CAL_SEL_SHIFT 0 + + +#define MSM8939_S0_P1_SHIFT 3 +#define MSM8939_S1_P1_SHIFT 15 +#define MSM8939_S2_P1_SHIFT_0_4 27 +#define MSM8939_S2_P1_SHIFT_5 5 +#define MSM8939_S3_P1_SHIFT 7 +#define MSM8939_S4_P1_SHIFT 19 +#define MSM8939_S5_P1_SHIFT 8 +#define MSM8939_S6_P1_SHIFT 20 +//yes, 7 is missing in downstream +#define MSM8939_S8_P1_SHIFT 12 +#define MSM8939_S9_P1_SHIFT 21 + +#define MSM8939_S0_P2_SHIFT 9 +#define MSM8939_S1_P2_SHIFT 21 +#define MSM8939_S2_P2_SHIFT 1 +#define MSM8939_S3_P2_SHIFT 13 +#define MSM8939_S4_P2_SHIFT 25 +#define MSM8939_S5_P2_SHIFT 14 +#define MSM8939_S6_P2_SHIFT 26 +#define MSM8939_S7_P2_SHIFT 6 +#define MSM8939_S8_P2_SHIFT 18 +#define MSM8939_S9_P2_SHIFT_0_4 27 +#define MSM8939_S9_P2_SHIFT_5 8 + /* eeprom layout data for 8974 */ #define BASE1_MASK 0xff #define S0_P1_MASK 0x3f00 @@ -189,6 +247,73 @@ static int calibrate_8916(struct tsens_priv *priv) return 0; } +static int calibrate_8939(struct tsens_priv *priv) +{ + int base0 = 0, base1 = 0, i; + u32 p1[11], p2[11]; + int mode = 0; + u32 *qfprom_cdata, *qfprom_csel; + + qfprom_cdata = (u32 *)qfprom_read(priv->dev, "calib"); + if (IS_ERR(qfprom_cdata)) + return PTR_ERR(qfprom_cdata); + + qfprom_csel = (u32 *)qfprom_read(priv->dev, "calib_sel"); + if (IS_ERR(qfprom_csel)) { + kfree(qfprom_cdata); + return PTR_ERR(qfprom_csel); + } + + mode = (qfprom_csel[0] & MSM8939_CAL_SEL_MASK) >> MSM8939_CAL_SEL_SHIFT; + dev_dbg(priv->dev, "calibration mode is %d\n", mode); + switch (mode) { + case TWO_PT_CALIB: + base1 = (qfprom_cdata[1] & MSM8939_BASE1_MASK) >> MSM8939_BASE1_SHIFT; + p2[0] = (qfprom_cdata[0] & MSM8939_S0_P2_MASK) >> MSM8939_S0_P2_SHIFT; + p2[1] = (qfprom_cdata[0] & MSM8939_S1_P2_MASK) >> MSM8939_S1_P2_SHIFT; + p2[2] = (qfprom_cdata[1] & MSM8939_S2_P2_MASK) >> MSM8939_S2_P2_SHIFT; + p2[3] = (qfprom_cdata[1] & MSM8939_S3_P2_MASK) >> MSM8939_S3_P2_SHIFT; + p2[4] = (qfprom_cdata[1] & MSM8939_S4_P2_MASK) >> MSM8939_S4_P2_SHIFT; + p2[5] = (qfprom_cdata[1] & MSM8939_S5_P2_MASK) >> MSM8939_S5_P2_SHIFT; + p2[6] = (qfprom_cdata[1] & MSM8939_S6_P2_MASK) >> MSM8939_S6_P2_SHIFT; + p2[7] = (qfprom_cdata[1] & MSM8939_S7_P2_MASK) >> MSM8939_S7_P2_SHIFT; + p2[8] = (qfprom_cdata[1] & MSM8939_S8_P2_MASK) >> MSM8939_S8_P2_SHIFT; + p2[9] = (qfprom_cdata[1] & MSM8939_S9_P2_MASK_0_4) >> MSM8939_S9_P2_SHIFT_0_4; + p2[10] = (qfprom_cdata[1] & MSM8939_S9_P2_MASK_5) >> MSM8939_S9_P2_SHIFT_5; + for (i = 0; i < priv->num_sensors; i++) + p2[i] = ((base1 + p2[i]) << 3); + /* Fall through */ + case ONE_PT_CALIB2: + base0 = (qfprom_cdata[0] & MSM8939_BASE0_MASK); + p1[0] = (qfprom_cdata[0] & MSM8939_S0_P1_MASK) >> MSM8939_S0_P1_SHIFT; + p1[1] = (qfprom_cdata[0] & MSM8939_S1_P1_MASK) >> MSM8939_S1_P1_SHIFT; + p1[2] = (qfprom_cdata[0] & MSM8939_S2_P1_MASK_0_4) >> MSM8939_S2_P1_SHIFT_0_4; + p1[3] = (qfprom_cdata[0] & MSM8939_S2_P1_MASK_5) >> MSM8939_S2_P1_SHIFT_5; + p1[4] = (qfprom_cdata[1] & MSM8939_S3_P1_MASK) >> MSM8939_S3_P1_SHIFT; + p1[5] = (qfprom_cdata[1] & MSM8939_S4_P1_MASK) >> MSM8939_S4_P1_SHIFT; + p1[6] = (qfprom_cdata[1] & MSM8939_S5_P1_MASK) >> MSM8939_S5_P1_SHIFT; + p1[7] = (qfprom_cdata[1] & MSM8939_S6_P1_MASK) >> MSM8939_S6_P1_SHIFT; + //yes, 7 is missing in downstream + p1[8] = (qfprom_cdata[1] & MSM8939_S8_P1_MASK) >> MSM8939_S8_P1_SHIFT; + p1[9] = (qfprom_cdata[1] & MSM8939_S9_P1_MASK) >> MSM8939_S9_P1_SHIFT; + for (i = 0; i < priv->num_sensors; i++) + p1[i] = (((base0) + p1[i]) << 3); + break; + default: + for (i = 0; i < priv->num_sensors; i++) { + p1[i] = 500; + p2[i] = 780; + } + break; + } + + compute_intercept_slope(priv, p1, p2, mode); + kfree(qfprom_cdata); + kfree(qfprom_csel); + + return 0; +} + static int calibrate_8974(struct tsens_priv *priv) { int base1 = 0, base2 = 0, i; @@ -325,7 +450,7 @@ static int calibrate_8974(struct tsens_priv *priv) return 0; } -/* v0.1: 8916, 8974 */ +/* v0.1: 8916, 8939, 8974 */ static struct tsens_features tsens_v0_1_feat = { .ver_major = VER_0_1, @@ -386,6 +511,21 @@ struct tsens_plat_data data_8916 = { .fields = tsens_v0_1_regfields, }; +static const struct tsens_ops ops_8939 = { + .init = init_common, + .calibrate = calibrate_8939, + .get_temp = get_temp_common, +}; + +struct tsens_plat_data data_8939 = { + .num_sensors = 10, + .ops = &ops_8939, + .hw_ids = (unsigned int []){0, 1, 2, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9 }, + + .feat = &tsens_v0_1_feat, + .fields = tsens_v0_1_regfields, +}; + static const struct tsens_ops ops_8974 = { .init = init_common, .calibrate = calibrate_8974, diff --git a/drivers/thermal/qcom/tsens.c b/drivers/thermal/qcom/tsens.c index 2f77d235cf735..f654057e96ae1 100644 --- a/drivers/thermal/qcom/tsens.c +++ b/drivers/thermal/qcom/tsens.c @@ -59,6 +59,9 @@ static const struct of_device_id tsens_table[] = { { .compatible = "qcom,msm8916-tsens", .data = &data_8916, + }, { + .compatible = "qcom,msm8939-tsens", + .data = &data_8939, }, { .compatible = "qcom,msm8974-tsens", .data = &data_8974, diff --git a/drivers/thermal/qcom/tsens.h b/drivers/thermal/qcom/tsens.h index 502acf0e68285..403b15546f648 100644 --- a/drivers/thermal/qcom/tsens.h +++ b/drivers/thermal/qcom/tsens.h @@ -590,7 +590,7 @@ irqreturn_t tsens_critical_irq_thread(int irq, void *data); extern struct tsens_plat_data data_8960; /* TSENS v0.1 targets */ -extern struct tsens_plat_data data_8916, data_8974; +extern struct tsens_plat_data data_8916, data_8939, data_8974; /* TSENS v1 targets */ extern struct tsens_plat_data data_tsens_v1, data_8976;
Signed-off-by: Konrad Dybcio <konradybcio@gmail.com> --- drivers/thermal/qcom/tsens-v0_1.c | 142 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++- drivers/thermal/qcom/tsens.c | 3 + drivers/thermal/qcom/tsens.h | 2 +- 3 files changed, 145 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)