diff mbox series

qcom: spmi-regulator: Add support for ULT LV_P50 and ULT P300

Message ID 20210225213514.117031-1-konrad.dybcio@somainline.org (mailing list archive)
State Accepted
Commit 438421b07bf84988a819a635cd8bdf6a4d7f72f2
Headers show
Series qcom: spmi-regulator: Add support for ULT LV_P50 and ULT P300 | expand

Commit Message

Konrad Dybcio Feb. 25, 2021, 9:35 p.m. UTC 
From: AngeloGioacchino Del Regno <angelogioacchino.delregno@somainline.org>

The ULT LV_P50 shares the same configuration as the other ULT LV_Pxxx
and the ULT P300 shares the same as the other ULT Pxxx.

These two regulator types are found on PM8950 and its variants.

Signed-off-by: AngeloGioacchino Del Regno <angelogioacchino.delregno@somainline.org>
Signed-off-by: Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@somainline.org>
---
 drivers/regulator/qcom_spmi-regulator.c | 2 ++
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)

Comments

Mark Brown March 1, 2021, 2:23 p.m. UTC | #1 
On Thu, Feb 25, 2021 at 10:35:13PM +0100, Konrad Dybcio wrote:
> From: AngeloGioacchino Del Regno <angelogioacchino.delregno@somainline.org>
> 
> The ULT LV_P50 shares the same configuration as the other ULT LV_Pxxx
> and the ULT P300 shares the same as the other ULT Pxxx.

Please submit patches using subject lines reflecting the style for the
subsystem, this makes it easier for people to identify relevant patches.
Look at what existing commits in the area you're changing are doing and
make sure your subject lines visually resemble what they're doing.
There's no need to resubmit to fix this alone.
Konrad Dybcio March 1, 2021, 2:27 p.m. UTC | #2 
On 01.03.2021 15:23, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 25, 2021 at 10:35:13PM +0100, Konrad Dybcio wrote:
>> From: AngeloGioacchino Del Regno <angelogioacchino.delregno@somainline.org>
>>
>> The ULT LV_P50 shares the same configuration as the other ULT LV_Pxxx
>> and the ULT P300 shares the same as the other ULT Pxxx.
> Please submit patches using subject lines reflecting the style for the
> subsystem, this makes it easier for people to identify relevant patches.
> Look at what existing commits in the area you're changing are doing and
> make sure your subject lines visually resemble what they're doing.
> There's no need to resubmit to fix this alone.

Yeah, sorry for that.. We've had these changes for a veery long time and it now the fact that the commit title was sub-optimal went under our radar.. Hopefully won't happen again!


Konrad
Mark Brown March 1, 2021, 11:37 p.m. UTC | #3 
On Thu, 25 Feb 2021 22:35:13 +0100, Konrad Dybcio wrote:
> The ULT LV_P50 shares the same configuration as the other ULT LV_Pxxx
> and the ULT P300 shares the same as the other ULT Pxxx.
> 
> These two regulator types are found on PM8950 and its variants.

Applied to

   https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/broonie/regulator.git for-next

Thanks!

[1/1] qcom: spmi-regulator: Add support for ULT LV_P50 and ULT P300
      commit: b15d870510c0a3910c9980ebceab885a390af60c

All being well this means that it will be integrated into the linux-next
tree (usually sometime in the next 24 hours) and sent to Linus during
the next merge window (or sooner if it is a bug fix), however if
problems are discovered then the patch may be dropped or reverted.

You may get further e-mails resulting from automated or manual testing
and review of the tree, please engage with people reporting problems and
send followup patches addressing any issues that are reported if needed.

If any updates are required or you are submitting further changes they
should be sent as incremental updates against current git, existing
patches will not be replaced.

Please add any relevant lists and maintainers to the CCs when replying
to this mail.

Thanks,
Mark
patchwork-bot+linux-arm-msm@kernel.org May 26, 2021, 7:03 p.m. UTC | #4 
Hello:

This patch was applied to qcom/linux.git (refs/heads/for-next):

On Thu, 25 Feb 2021 22:35:13 +0100 you wrote:
> From: AngeloGioacchino Del Regno <angelogioacchino.delregno@somainline.org>
> 
> The ULT LV_P50 shares the same configuration as the other ULT LV_Pxxx
> and the ULT P300 shares the same as the other ULT Pxxx.
> 
> These two regulator types are found on PM8950 and its variants.
> 
> [...]

Here is the summary with links:
  - qcom: spmi-regulator: Add support for ULT LV_P50 and ULT P300
    https://git.kernel.org/qcom/c/438421b07bf8

You are awesome, thank you!
--
Deet-doot-dot, I am a bot.
https://korg.docs.kernel.org/patchwork/pwbot.html
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/drivers/regulator/qcom_spmi-regulator.c b/drivers/regulator/qcom_spmi-regulator.c
index e62e1d72d943..00e1d8e9637e 100644
--- a/drivers/regulator/qcom_spmi-regulator.c
+++ b/drivers/regulator/qcom_spmi-regulator.c
@@ -1522,10 +1522,12 @@  static const struct spmi_regulator_mapping supported_regulators[] = {
 	SPMI_VREG(ULT_LDO, N600_ST, 0, INF, ULT_LDO, ult_ldo, ult_nldo, 10000),
 	SPMI_VREG(ULT_LDO, N900_ST, 0, INF, ULT_LDO, ult_ldo, ult_nldo, 10000),
 	SPMI_VREG(ULT_LDO, N1200_ST, 0, INF, ULT_LDO, ult_ldo, ult_nldo, 10000),
+	SPMI_VREG(ULT_LDO, LV_P50,   0, INF, ULT_LDO, ult_ldo, ult_pldo, 10000),
 	SPMI_VREG(ULT_LDO, LV_P150,  0, INF, ULT_LDO, ult_ldo, ult_pldo, 10000),
 	SPMI_VREG(ULT_LDO, LV_P300,  0, INF, ULT_LDO, ult_ldo, ult_pldo, 10000),
 	SPMI_VREG(ULT_LDO, LV_P450,  0, INF, ULT_LDO, ult_ldo, ult_pldo, 10000),
 	SPMI_VREG(ULT_LDO, P600,     0, INF, ULT_LDO, ult_ldo, ult_pldo, 10000),
+	SPMI_VREG(ULT_LDO, P300,     0, INF, ULT_LDO, ult_ldo, ult_pldo, 10000),
 	SPMI_VREG(ULT_LDO, P150,     0, INF, ULT_LDO, ult_ldo, ult_pldo, 10000),
 	SPMI_VREG(ULT_LDO, P50,     0, INF, ULT_LDO, ult_ldo, ult_pldo, 5000),
 };