| Message ID | 20210402152701.v3.7.Ic14a7ab8035df89e19a25ad4fbf2004f9673f167@changeid (mailing list archive) |
|---|---|
| State | Not Applicable, archived |
| Headers | show |
| Series | drm: Fix EDID reading on ti-sn65dsi86 | expand |
Hi Doug, Thank you for the patch. On Fri, Apr 02, 2021 at 03:28:41PM -0700, Douglas Anderson wrote: > As of commit 5186421cbfe2 ("drm: Introduce epoch counter to > drm_connector") the drm_get_edid() function calls > drm_connector_update_edid_property() for us. There's no reason for us > to call it again. > > Signed-off-by: Douglas Anderson <dianders@chromium.org> > Reviewed-by: Andrzej Hajda <a.hajda@samsung.com> Reviewed-by: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com> This looks like a widespread issue, would you be able to send a patch to address all the other drivers ? > --- > > (no changes since v1) > > drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/ti-sn65dsi86.c | 11 ++++------- > 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/ti-sn65dsi86.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/ti-sn65dsi86.c > index 51db30d573c1..6390bc58f29a 100644 > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/ti-sn65dsi86.c > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/ti-sn65dsi86.c > @@ -270,7 +270,7 @@ static int ti_sn_bridge_connector_get_modes(struct drm_connector *connector) > { > struct ti_sn_bridge *pdata = connector_to_ti_sn_bridge(connector); > struct edid *edid = pdata->edid; > - int num, ret; > + int num; > > if (!edid) { > pm_runtime_get_sync(pdata->dev); > @@ -279,12 +279,9 @@ static int ti_sn_bridge_connector_get_modes(struct drm_connector *connector) > } > > if (edid && drm_edid_is_valid(edid)) { > - ret = drm_connector_update_edid_property(connector, edid); > - if (!ret) { > - num = drm_add_edid_modes(connector, edid); > - if (num) > - return num; > - } > + num = drm_add_edid_modes(connector, edid); > + if (num) > + return num; > } > > return drm_panel_get_modes(pdata->panel, connector);
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/ti-sn65dsi86.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/ti-sn65dsi86.c index 51db30d573c1..6390bc58f29a 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/ti-sn65dsi86.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/ti-sn65dsi86.c @@ -270,7 +270,7 @@ static int ti_sn_bridge_connector_get_modes(struct drm_connector *connector) { struct ti_sn_bridge *pdata = connector_to_ti_sn_bridge(connector); struct edid *edid = pdata->edid; - int num, ret; + int num; if (!edid) { pm_runtime_get_sync(pdata->dev); @@ -279,12 +279,9 @@ static int ti_sn_bridge_connector_get_modes(struct drm_connector *connector) } if (edid && drm_edid_is_valid(edid)) { - ret = drm_connector_update_edid_property(connector, edid); - if (!ret) { - num = drm_add_edid_modes(connector, edid); - if (num) - return num; - } + num = drm_add_edid_modes(connector, edid); + if (num) + return num; } return drm_panel_get_modes(pdata->panel, connector);
As of commit 5186421cbfe2 ("drm: Introduce epoch counter to drm_connector") the drm_get_edid() function calls drm_connector_update_edid_property() for us. There's no reason for us to call it again. Signed-off-by: Douglas Anderson <dianders@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Andrzej Hajda <a.hajda@samsung.com> --- (no changes since v1) drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/ti-sn65dsi86.c | 11 ++++------- 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)