Message ID | 20210621181016.365009-2-angelogioacchino.delregno@somainline.org (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
State | Superseded |
Headers | show |
Series | Implement SPM/SAW for MSM8998 and SDM6xx | expand |
On Mon, Jun 21, 2021 at 08:10:12PM +0200, AngeloGioacchino Del Regno wrote: > In commit a871be6b8eee ("cpuidle: Convert Qualcomm SPM driver to a generic > CPUidle driver") the SPM driver has been converted to a > generic CPUidle driver: that was mainly made to simplify the > driver and that was a great accomplishment; > Though, it was ignored that the SPM driver is not used only > on the ARM architecture. > I don't really understand why you insist on writing that I deliberately "ignored" your use case when converting the driver. This is not true. Perhaps that's not actually what you meant but that's how it sounds to me. > In preparation for the enablement of SPM features on AArch64/ARM64, > split the cpuidle-qcom-spm driver in two: the CPUIdle related > state machine (currently used only on ARM SoCs) stays there, while > the SPM communication handling lands back in soc/qcom/spm.c and > also making sure to not discard the simplifications that were > introduced in the aforementioned commit. > > Since now the "two drivers" are split, the SCM dependency in the > main SPM handling is gone and for this reason it was also possible > to move the SPM initialization early: this will also make sure that > whenever the SAW CPUIdle driver is getting initialized, the SPM > driver will be ready to do the job. > > Please note that the anticipation of the SPM initialization was > also done to optimize the boot times on platforms that have their > CPU/L2 idle states managed by other means (such as PSCI), while > needing SAW initialization for other purposes, like AVS control. > > Signed-off-by: AngeloGioacchino Del Regno <angelogioacchino.delregno@somainline.org> > --- > drivers/cpuidle/Kconfig.arm | 1 + > drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle-qcom-spm.c | 324 +++++++---------------------- > drivers/soc/qcom/Kconfig | 9 + > drivers/soc/qcom/Makefile | 1 + > drivers/soc/qcom/spm.c | 198 ++++++++++++++++++ > include/soc/qcom/spm.h | 41 ++++ > 6 files changed, 325 insertions(+), 249 deletions(-) > create mode 100644 drivers/soc/qcom/spm.c > create mode 100644 include/soc/qcom/spm.h > > diff --git a/drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle-qcom-spm.c b/drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle-qcom-spm.c > index adf91a6e4d7d..091453135ea6 100644 > --- a/drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle-qcom-spm.c > +++ b/drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle-qcom-spm.c > [...] > +static int spm_cpuidle_register(int cpu) > { > + struct platform_device *pdev = NULL; > + struct device_node *cpu_node, *saw_node; > + struct cpuidle_qcom_spm_data data = { > + .cpuidle_driver = { > + .name = "qcom_spm", > + .owner = THIS_MODULE, > + .cpumask = (struct cpumask *)cpumask_of(cpu), > + .states[0] = { > + .enter = spm_enter_idle_state, > + .exit_latency = 1, > + .target_residency = 1, > + .power_usage = UINT_MAX, > + .name = "WFI", > + .desc = "ARM WFI", > + } > + } > + }; The stack is gone after the function returns. Stephan [ 0.756176] 8<--- cut here --- [ 0.756222] ledtrig-cpu: registered to indicate activity on CPUs [ 0.756566] 8<--- cut here --- [ 0.756567] 8<--- cut here --- [ 0.756570] Unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at virtual address 00000000 [ 0.756571] Unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at virtual address 00000000 [ 0.756577] pgd = (ptrval) [ 0.756578] pgd = (ptrval) [ 0.756583] [00000000] *pgd=00000000 [ 0.756583] [00000000] *pgd=00000000 [ 0.756588] [ 0.756597] Internal error: Oops: 80000005 [#1] PREEMPT SMP ARM [ 0.756605] Modules linked in: [ 0.756613] CPU: 3 PID: 0 Comm: swapper/3 Not tainted 5.13.0-rc7 #9 [ 0.756622] Hardware name: Generic DT based system [ 0.756626] PC is at 0x0 [ 0.756634] LR is at cpuidle_enter_state+0x12c/0x358 [ 0.756650] pc : [<00000000>] lr : [<c0609c6c>] psr: 60000093 [ 0.756656] sp : c1085f68 ip : 017dc905 fp : 00000000 [ 0.756662] r10: 00000000 r9 : c1059b28 r8 : ef000a30 [ 0.756668] r7 : c1059938 r6 : 2d183b16 r5 : c1059b18 r4 : 00000005 [ 0.756675] r3 : 00000000 r2 : 00000005 r1 : c1059938 r0 : ef000a30 [ 0.756682] Flags: nZCv IRQs off FIQs on Mode SVC_32 ISA ARM Segment none [ 0.756691] Control: 10c5383d Table: 8000406a DAC: 00000051 [ 0.756696] Register r0 information: non-slab/vmalloc memory [ 0.756705] Register r1 information: non-slab/vmalloc memory [ 0.756713] Register r2 information: non-paged memory [ 0.756719] Register r3 information: NULL pointer [ 0.756726] Register r4 information: non-paged memory [ 0.756732] Register r5 information: non-slab/vmalloc memory [ 0.756739] Register r6 information: non-paged memory [ 0.756746] Register r7 information: non-slab/vmalloc memory [ 0.756753] Register r8 information: non-slab/vmalloc memory [ 0.756760] Register r9 information: non-slab/vmalloc memory [ 0.756767] Register r10 information: NULL pointer [ 0.756773] Register r11 information: NULL pointer [ 0.756780] Register r12 information: non-paged memory [ 0.756787] Process swapper/3 (pid: 0, stack limit = 0x(ptrval)) [ 0.756794] Stack: (0xc1085f68 to 0xc1086000) [ 0.756804] 5f60: 00000000 c1084000 c1085fc3 ef000a30 c1059938 00000005 [ 0.756815] 5f80: c0c06090 2719c400 00000000 c1084000 c1059938 c0609edc 00000003 c1084000 [ 0.756826] 5fa0: c0c0604c ef000a30 c0b4ea28 c015d0f8 c1085fb0 00000005 00000093 c0cb2cc2 [ 0.756837] 5fc0: 00000051 b02e84c1 c1085ff8 00000093 00000051 10c0387d c1085ff8 8000406a [ 0.756848] 5fe0: 410fd030 00000000 00000000 c015d51c 8107806a 801015d0 00000000 00000000 [ 0.756861] [<c0609c6c>] (cpuidle_enter_state) from [<c0609edc>] (cpuidle_enter+0x30/0x40) [ 0.756883] [<c0609edc>] (cpuidle_enter) from [<c015d0f8>] (do_idle+0x210/0x2e8) [ 0.756904] [<c015d0f8>] (do_idle) from [<c015d51c>] (cpu_startup_entry+0x18/0x1c) [ 0.756920] [<c015d51c>] (cpu_startup_entry) from [<801015d0>] (0x801015d0) [ 0.756937] Code: bad PC value [ 0.756950] Internal error: Oops: 80000005 [#2] PREEMPT SMP ARM [ 0.756952] ---[ end trace 9857663ab4add8af ]--- [ 0.756957] Modules linked in: [ 0.756958] Kernel panic - not syncing: Attempted to kill the idle task! [ 0.756960] [ 0.756963] CPU: 1 PID: 0 Comm: swapper/1 Tainted: G D 5.13.0-rc7 #9 [ 0.756972] Hardware name: Generic DT based system [ 0.756976] PC is at 0x0 [ 0.756982] LR is at cpuidle_enter_state+0x12c/0x358 [ 0.756993] pc : [<00000000>] lr : [<c0609c6c>] psr: 60000093 [ 0.756999] sp : c1081f68 ip : 017dc905 fp : 00000000 [ 0.757005] r10: 00000000 r9 : c1059b28 r8 : eefe0a30 [ 0.757011] r7 : c1059938 r6 : 2d1844da r5 : c1059b18 r4 : 00000005 [ 0.757018] r3 : 00000000 r2 : 00000005 r1 : c1059938 r0 : eefe0a30 [ 0.757025] Flags: nZCv IRQs off FIQs on Mode SVC_32 ISA ARM Segment none [ 0.757033] Control: 10c5383d Table: 8000406a DAC: 00000051 [ 0.757038] Register r0 information: non-slab/vmalloc memory [ 0.757047] Register r1 information: non-slab/vmalloc memory [ 0.757054] Register r2 information: non-paged memory [ 0.757061] Register r3 information: NULL pointer [ 0.757067] Register r4 information: non-paged memory [ 0.757074] Register r5 information: non-slab/vmalloc memory [ 0.757080] Register r6 information: non-paged memory [ 0.757087] Register r7 information: non-slab/vmalloc memory [ 0.757094] Register r8 information: non-slab/vmalloc memory [ 0.757101] Register r9 information: non-slab/vmalloc memory [ 0.757108] Register r10 information: NULL pointer [ 0.757114] Register r11 information: NULL pointer [ 0.757121] Register r12 information: non-paged memory [ 0.757128] Process swapper/1 (pid: 0, stack limit = 0x(ptrval)) [ 0.757134] Stack: (0xc1081f68 to 0xc1082000) [ 0.757144] 1f60: 00000000 c1080000 c1081fc3 eefe0a30 c1059938 00000005 [ 0.757155] 1f80: c0c06090 2719c400 00000000 c1080000 c1059938 c0609edc 00000001 c1080000 [ 0.757167] 1fa0: c0c0604c eefe0a30 c0b4ea28 c015d0f8 c1081fb0 00000005 00000093 c0cb2cc2 [ 0.757178] 1fc0: 00000051 cf41e4d1 c1081ff8 00000093 00000051 10c0387d c1081ff8 8000406a [ 0.757189] 1fe0: 410fd030 00000000 00000000 c015d51c 8107806a 801015d0 00000000 00000000 [ 0.757197] [<c0609c6c>] (cpuidle_enter_state) from [<c0609edc>] (cpuidle_enter+0x30/0x40) [ 0.757218] [<c0609edc>] (cpuidle_enter) from [<c015d0f8>] (do_idle+0x210/0x2e8) [ 0.757236] [<c015d0f8>] (do_idle) from [<c015d51c>] (cpu_startup_entry+0x18/0x1c) [ 0.757251] [<c015d51c>] (cpu_startup_entry) from [<801015d0>] (0x801015d0) [ 0.757267] Code: bad PC value [ 0.757271] ---[ end trace 9857663ab4add8b0 ]--- [ 0.761255] Unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at virtual address 00000000 [ 0.761256] CPU2: stopping [ 0.761261] pgd = (ptrval) [ 0.761261] CPU: 2 PID: 1 Comm: swapper/0 Tainted: G D 5.13.0-rc7 #9 [ 0.761265] [00000000] *pgd=00000000 [ 0.761271] Hardware name: Generic DT based system [ 0.761275] Internal error: Oops: 80000005 [#3] PREEMPT SMP ARM [ 0.761281] Modules linked in: [ 0.761278] [<c010ee70>] (unwind_backtrace) from [<c010ac80>] (show_stack+0x10/0x14) [ 0.761287] CPU: 0 PID: 0 Comm: swapper/0 Tainted: G D 5.13.0-rc7 #9 [ 0.761296] Hardware name: Generic DT based system [ 0.761300] PC is at 0x0 [ 0.761299] [<c010ac80>] (show_stack) from [<c07bcbb0>] (dump_stack+0x94/0xa8) [ 0.761306] LR is at cpuidle_enter_state+0x12c/0x358 [ 0.761317] pc : [<00000000>] lr : [<c0609c6c>] psr: 60000093 [ 0.761323] sp : c0c01f28 ip : 017dc905 fp : 00000000 [ 0.761318] [<c07bcbb0>] (dump_stack) from [<c010ccbc>] (do_handle_IPI+0xf4/0x11c) [ 0.761329] r10: 00000000 r9 : c1059b28 r8 : eefd0a30 [ 0.761335] r7 : c1059938 r6 : 2d12399c r5 : c1059b18 r4 : 00000005 [ 0.761335] [<c010ccbc>] (do_handle_IPI) from [<c010ccfc>] (ipi_handler+0x18/0x20) [ 0.761341] r3 : 00000000 r2 : 00000005 r1 : c1059938 r0 : eefd0a30 [ 0.761348] Flags: nZCv IRQs off FIQs on Mode SVC_32 ISA ARM Segment none [ 0.761356] Control: 10c5383d Table: 8000406a DAC: 00000051 [ 0.761350] [<c010ccfc>] (ipi_handler) from [<c018c898>] (handle_percpu_devid_irq+0x78/0x150) [ 0.761360] Register r0 information: non-slab/vmalloc memory [ 0.761369] Register r1 information: non-slab/vmalloc memory [ 0.761376] Register r2 information: [ 0.761368] [<c018c898>] (handle_percpu_devid_irq) from [<c01865d8>] (__handle_domain_irq+0x7c/0xd0) [ 0.761379] non-paged memory [ 0.761382] Register r3 information: NULL pointer [ 0.761389] Register r4 information: non-paged memory [ 0.761395] Register r5 information: [ 0.761389] [<c01865d8>] (__handle_domain_irq) from [<c04879f4>] (gic_handle_irq+0x70/0x84) [ 0.761398] non-slab/vmalloc memory [ 0.761402] Register r6 information: non-paged memory [ 0.761408] Register r7 information: non-slab/vmalloc memory [ 0.761415] Register r8 information: [ 0.761411] [<c04879f4>] (gic_handle_irq) from [<c0100b4c>] (__irq_svc+0x6c/0xa8) [ 0.761419] non-slab/vmalloc memory [ 0.761422] Register r9 information: non-slab/vmalloc memory [ 0.761427] Exception stack(0xc1059e28 to 0xc1059e70) [ 0.761429] Register r10 information: NULL pointer [ 0.761435] Register r11 information: [ 0.761437] 9e20: 60000093 2e4a2000 00000000 c0b48458 c0c060a8 00000034 [ 0.761440] NULL pointer [ 0.761443] Register r12 information: non-paged memory [ 0.761448] 9e40: c0cc8628 c1058000 60000013 00000000 c09fb5bc c0a614d4 00000143 c1059e78 [ 0.761449] Process swapper/0 (pid: 0, stack limit = 0x(ptrval)) [ 0.761456] 9e60: c0183ccc c0183cd0 60000013 ffffffff [ 0.761456] Stack: (0xc0c01f28 to 0xc0c02000) [ 0.761466] 1f20: 00000000 c0c00000 c0c01f83 eefd0a30 c1059938 00000005 [ 0.761462] [<c0100b4c>] (__irq_svc) from [<c0183cd0>] (vprintk_emit+0x17c/0x1d4) [ 0.761477] 1f40: c0c06090 26dcbb00 00000000 c0c00000 c1059938 c0609edc 00000000 c0c00000 [ 0.761479] [<c0183cd0>] (vprintk_emit) from [<c0183d4c>] (vprintk_default+0x24/0x2c) [ 0.761488] 1f60: c0c0604c eefd0a30 c0b4ea28 c015d0f8 c0c01f70 00000005 ef00cbc0 c0cb2cc2 [ 0.761498] 1f80: 00c00000 11feb622 c0b39a54 000000e1 c0c00000 00000001 c0b39a54 00000000 [ 0.761497] [<c0183d4c>] (vprintk_default) from [<c07ba87c>] (printk+0x30/0x54) [ 0.761509] 1fa0: ef00cbc0 c0b39a54 00000000 c015d51c c0cc6040 c0b00e34 ffffffff ffffffff [ 0.761520] 1fc0: 00000000 c0b00590 00000000 c0b39a54 11fbbb22 00000000 c0b00330 00000051 [ 0.761514] [<c07ba87c>] (printk) from [<c0b264a0>] (ledtrig_cpu_init+0xf0/0xfc) [ 0.761530] 1fe0: 10c0387d 00000000 81e00000 410fd030 10c5387d 00000000 00000000 00000000 [ 0.761534] [<c0b264a0>] (ledtrig_cpu_init) from [<c01017a4>] (do_one_initcall+0x50/0x1c4) [ 0.761537] [<c0609c6c>] (cpuidle_enter_state) from [<c0609edc>] (cpuidle_enter+0x30/0x40) [ 0.761552] [<c01017a4>] (do_one_initcall) from [<c0b010e0>] (kernel_init_freeable+0x22c/0x290) [ 0.761558] [<c0609edc>] (cpuidle_enter) from [<c015d0f8>] (do_idle+0x210/0x2e8) [ 0.761569] [<c0b010e0>] (kernel_init_freeable) from [<c07c014c>] (kernel_init+0x8/0x118) [ 0.761575] [<c015d0f8>] (do_idle) from [<c015d51c>] (cpu_startup_entry+0x18/0x1c) [ 0.761588] [<c07c014c>] (kernel_init) from [<c0100150>] (ret_from_fork+0x14/0x24) [ 0.761591] [<c015d51c>] (cpu_startup_entry) from [<c0b00e34>] (start_kernel+0x4e4/0x510) [ 0.761605] Exception stack(0xc1059fb0 to 0xc1059ff8) [ 0.761606] [<c0b00e34>] (start_kernel) from [<00000000>] (0x0) [ 0.761613] 9fa0: 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 [ 0.761620] Code: bad PC value [ 0.761623] 9fc0: 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 [ 0.761625] ---[ end trace 9857663ab4add8b1 ]--- [ 0.761632] 9fe0: 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000013 00000000 [ 1.740778] ---[ end Kernel panic - not syncing: Attempted to kill the idle task! ]---
21 jun 2021 21:10, AngeloGioacchino Del Regno <angelogioacchino.delregno@somainline.org>: > > In commit a871be6b8eee ("cpuidle: Convert Qualcomm SPM driver to a generic > CPUidle driver") the SPM driver has been converted to a > generic CPUidle driver: that was mainly made to simplify the > driver and that was a great accomplishment; > Though, it was ignored that the SPM driver is not used only > on the ARM architecture. How many revisions does it take to reword the last sentence to something more neutral like"... arm64 use case was not implemented so far." ?
Il 21/06/21 23:08, Stephan Gerhold ha scritto: > On Mon, Jun 21, 2021 at 08:10:12PM +0200, AngeloGioacchino Del Regno wrote: >> In commit a871be6b8eee ("cpuidle: Convert Qualcomm SPM driver to a generic >> CPUidle driver") the SPM driver has been converted to a >> generic CPUidle driver: that was mainly made to simplify the >> driver and that was a great accomplishment; >> Though, it was ignored that the SPM driver is not used only >> on the ARM architecture. >> > > I don't really understand why you insist on writing that I deliberately > "ignored" your use case when converting the driver. This is not true. > Perhaps that's not actually what you meant but that's how it sounds to > me. > So much noise for one single word. I will change it since it seems to be that much of a deal, and I'm sorry if that hurt you in any way. For the records, though, I really don't see anything offensive in that, and anyway I didn't mean to be offensive in any way. >> In preparation for the enablement of SPM features on AArch64/ARM64, >> split the cpuidle-qcom-spm driver in two: the CPUIdle related >> state machine (currently used only on ARM SoCs) stays there, while >> the SPM communication handling lands back in soc/qcom/spm.c and >> also making sure to not discard the simplifications that were >> introduced in the aforementioned commit. >> >> Since now the "two drivers" are split, the SCM dependency in the >> main SPM handling is gone and for this reason it was also possible >> to move the SPM initialization early: this will also make sure that >> whenever the SAW CPUIdle driver is getting initialized, the SPM >> driver will be ready to do the job. >> >> Please note that the anticipation of the SPM initialization was >> also done to optimize the boot times on platforms that have their >> CPU/L2 idle states managed by other means (such as PSCI), while >> needing SAW initialization for other purposes, like AVS control. >> >> Signed-off-by: AngeloGioacchino Del Regno <angelogioacchino.delregno@somainline.org> >> --- >> drivers/cpuidle/Kconfig.arm | 1 + >> drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle-qcom-spm.c | 324 +++++++---------------------- >> drivers/soc/qcom/Kconfig | 9 + >> drivers/soc/qcom/Makefile | 1 + >> drivers/soc/qcom/spm.c | 198 ++++++++++++++++++ >> include/soc/qcom/spm.h | 41 ++++ >> 6 files changed, 325 insertions(+), 249 deletions(-) >> create mode 100644 drivers/soc/qcom/spm.c >> create mode 100644 include/soc/qcom/spm.h >> >> diff --git a/drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle-qcom-spm.c b/drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle-qcom-spm.c >> index adf91a6e4d7d..091453135ea6 100644 >> --- a/drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle-qcom-spm.c >> +++ b/drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle-qcom-spm.c >> [...] >> +static int spm_cpuidle_register(int cpu) >> { >> + struct platform_device *pdev = NULL; >> + struct device_node *cpu_node, *saw_node; >> + struct cpuidle_qcom_spm_data data = { >> + .cpuidle_driver = { >> + .name = "qcom_spm", >> + .owner = THIS_MODULE, >> + .cpumask = (struct cpumask *)cpumask_of(cpu), >> + .states[0] = { >> + .enter = spm_enter_idle_state, >> + .exit_latency = 1, >> + .target_residency = 1, >> + .power_usage = UINT_MAX, >> + .name = "WFI", >> + .desc = "ARM WFI", >> + } >> + } >> + }; > > The stack is gone after the function returns. > Argh, I wrongly assumed that cpuidle was actually copying this locally. Okay, let's see what else looking clean I can come up with.
On Tue, Jun 22, 2021 at 01:39:15PM +0200, AngeloGioacchino Del Regno wrote: > Il 21/06/21 23:08, Stephan Gerhold ha scritto: > > On Mon, Jun 21, 2021 at 08:10:12PM +0200, AngeloGioacchino Del Regno wrote: > > > In commit a871be6b8eee ("cpuidle: Convert Qualcomm SPM driver to a generic > > > CPUidle driver") the SPM driver has been converted to a > > > generic CPUidle driver: that was mainly made to simplify the > > > driver and that was a great accomplishment; > > > Though, it was ignored that the SPM driver is not used only > > > on the ARM architecture. > > > > > > > I don't really understand why you insist on writing that I deliberately > > "ignored" your use case when converting the driver. This is not true. > > Perhaps that's not actually what you meant but that's how it sounds to > > me. > > > > So much noise for one single word. I will change it since it seems to be > that much of a deal, and I'm sorry if that hurt you in any way. > > For the records, though, I really don't see anything offensive in that, > and anyway I didn't mean to be offensive in any way. > I try to put a lot of thought into my patches to make sure I don't accidentally break some other use cases. Having that sentence in the commit log does indeed hurt me a bit since I would never deliberately disregard other use cases without making it absolutely clear in the patch. By using the word "ignored" ("deliberately not listen or pay attention to") [1] you say that I did, and that's why I would prefer if you reword this slightly. :) [1] https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/ignore > > > In preparation for the enablement of SPM features on AArch64/ARM64, > > > split the cpuidle-qcom-spm driver in two: the CPUIdle related > > > state machine (currently used only on ARM SoCs) stays there, while > > > the SPM communication handling lands back in soc/qcom/spm.c and > > > also making sure to not discard the simplifications that were > > > introduced in the aforementioned commit. > > > > > > Since now the "two drivers" are split, the SCM dependency in the > > > main SPM handling is gone and for this reason it was also possible > > > to move the SPM initialization early: this will also make sure that > > > whenever the SAW CPUIdle driver is getting initialized, the SPM > > > driver will be ready to do the job. > > > > > > Please note that the anticipation of the SPM initialization was > > > also done to optimize the boot times on platforms that have their > > > CPU/L2 idle states managed by other means (such as PSCI), while > > > needing SAW initialization for other purposes, like AVS control. > > > > > > Signed-off-by: AngeloGioacchino Del Regno <angelogioacchino.delregno@somainline.org> > > > --- > > > drivers/cpuidle/Kconfig.arm | 1 + > > > drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle-qcom-spm.c | 324 +++++++---------------------- > > > drivers/soc/qcom/Kconfig | 9 + > > > drivers/soc/qcom/Makefile | 1 + > > > drivers/soc/qcom/spm.c | 198 ++++++++++++++++++ > > > include/soc/qcom/spm.h | 41 ++++ > > > 6 files changed, 325 insertions(+), 249 deletions(-) > > > create mode 100644 drivers/soc/qcom/spm.c > > > create mode 100644 include/soc/qcom/spm.h > > > > > > diff --git a/drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle-qcom-spm.c b/drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle-qcom-spm.c > > > index adf91a6e4d7d..091453135ea6 100644 > > > --- a/drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle-qcom-spm.c > > > +++ b/drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle-qcom-spm.c > > > [...] > > > +static int spm_cpuidle_register(int cpu) > > > { > > > + struct platform_device *pdev = NULL; > > > + struct device_node *cpu_node, *saw_node; > > > + struct cpuidle_qcom_spm_data data = { > > > + .cpuidle_driver = { > > > + .name = "qcom_spm", > > > + .owner = THIS_MODULE, > > > + .cpumask = (struct cpumask *)cpumask_of(cpu), > > > + .states[0] = { > > > + .enter = spm_enter_idle_state, > > > + .exit_latency = 1, > > > + .target_residency = 1, > > > + .power_usage = UINT_MAX, > > > + .name = "WFI", > > > + .desc = "ARM WFI", > > > + } > > > + } > > > + }; > > > > The stack is gone after the function returns. > > > > Argh, I wrongly assumed that cpuidle was actually copying this locally. > Okay, let's see what else looking clean I can come up with. I guess you could just use a devm_kzalloc() and then have code similar to the previous one (data->cpuidle_driver = <template>). You could alternatively use devm_kmalloc() without zero-initialization but the advantages of that should be negligible. Thanks! Stephan
Il 22/06/21 14:04, Stephan Gerhold ha scritto: > On Tue, Jun 22, 2021 at 01:39:15PM +0200, AngeloGioacchino Del Regno wrote: >> Il 21/06/21 23:08, Stephan Gerhold ha scritto: >>> On Mon, Jun 21, 2021 at 08:10:12PM +0200, AngeloGioacchino Del Regno wrote: >>>> In commit a871be6b8eee ("cpuidle: Convert Qualcomm SPM driver to a generic >>>> CPUidle driver") the SPM driver has been converted to a >>>> generic CPUidle driver: that was mainly made to simplify the >>>> driver and that was a great accomplishment; >>>> Though, it was ignored that the SPM driver is not used only >>>> on the ARM architecture. >>>> >>> >>> I don't really understand why you insist on writing that I deliberately >>> "ignored" your use case when converting the driver. This is not true. >>> Perhaps that's not actually what you meant but that's how it sounds to >>> me. >>> >> >> So much noise for one single word. I will change it since it seems to be >> that much of a deal, and I'm sorry if that hurt you in any way. >> >> For the records, though, I really don't see anything offensive in that, >> and anyway I didn't mean to be offensive in any way. >> > > I try to put a lot of thought into my patches to make sure I don't > accidentally break some other use cases. Having that sentence in the > commit log does indeed hurt me a bit since I would never deliberately > disregard other use cases without making it absolutely clear in the > patch. > > By using the word "ignored" ("deliberately not listen or pay attention > to") [1] you say that I did, and that's why I would prefer if you > reword this slightly. :) > As I said, I will reword it. > [1] https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/ignore > >>>> In preparation for the enablement of SPM features on AArch64/ARM64, >>>> split the cpuidle-qcom-spm driver in two: the CPUIdle related >>>> state machine (currently used only on ARM SoCs) stays there, while >>>> the SPM communication handling lands back in soc/qcom/spm.c and >>>> also making sure to not discard the simplifications that were >>>> introduced in the aforementioned commit. >>>> >>>> Since now the "two drivers" are split, the SCM dependency in the >>>> main SPM handling is gone and for this reason it was also possible >>>> to move the SPM initialization early: this will also make sure that >>>> whenever the SAW CPUIdle driver is getting initialized, the SPM >>>> driver will be ready to do the job. >>>> >>>> Please note that the anticipation of the SPM initialization was >>>> also done to optimize the boot times on platforms that have their >>>> CPU/L2 idle states managed by other means (such as PSCI), while >>>> needing SAW initialization for other purposes, like AVS control. >>>> >>>> Signed-off-by: AngeloGioacchino Del Regno <angelogioacchino.delregno@somainline.org> >>>> --- >>>> drivers/cpuidle/Kconfig.arm | 1 + >>>> drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle-qcom-spm.c | 324 +++++++---------------------- >>>> drivers/soc/qcom/Kconfig | 9 + >>>> drivers/soc/qcom/Makefile | 1 + >>>> drivers/soc/qcom/spm.c | 198 ++++++++++++++++++ >>>> include/soc/qcom/spm.h | 41 ++++ >>>> 6 files changed, 325 insertions(+), 249 deletions(-) >>>> create mode 100644 drivers/soc/qcom/spm.c >>>> create mode 100644 include/soc/qcom/spm.h >>>> >>>> diff --git a/drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle-qcom-spm.c b/drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle-qcom-spm.c >>>> index adf91a6e4d7d..091453135ea6 100644 >>>> --- a/drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle-qcom-spm.c >>>> +++ b/drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle-qcom-spm.c >>>> [...] >>>> +static int spm_cpuidle_register(int cpu) >>>> { >>>> + struct platform_device *pdev = NULL; >>>> + struct device_node *cpu_node, *saw_node; >>>> + struct cpuidle_qcom_spm_data data = { >>>> + .cpuidle_driver = { >>>> + .name = "qcom_spm", >>>> + .owner = THIS_MODULE, >>>> + .cpumask = (struct cpumask *)cpumask_of(cpu), >>>> + .states[0] = { >>>> + .enter = spm_enter_idle_state, >>>> + .exit_latency = 1, >>>> + .target_residency = 1, >>>> + .power_usage = UINT_MAX, >>>> + .name = "WFI", >>>> + .desc = "ARM WFI", >>>> + } >>>> + } >>>> + }; >>> >>> The stack is gone after the function returns. >>> >> >> Argh, I wrongly assumed that cpuidle was actually copying this locally. >> Okay, let's see what else looking clean I can come up with. > > I guess you could just use a devm_kzalloc() and then have code similar > to the previous one (data->cpuidle_driver = <template>). You could > alternatively use devm_kmalloc() without zero-initialization but the > advantages of that should be negligible. > Yes that would indeed work. It's just that I really don't like it. > Thanks! > Stephan >
diff --git a/drivers/cpuidle/Kconfig.arm b/drivers/cpuidle/Kconfig.arm index 334f83e56120..8a02213c8391 100644 --- a/drivers/cpuidle/Kconfig.arm +++ b/drivers/cpuidle/Kconfig.arm @@ -112,6 +112,7 @@ config ARM_QCOM_SPM_CPUIDLE select CPU_IDLE_MULTIPLE_DRIVERS select DT_IDLE_STATES select QCOM_SCM + select QCOM_SPM help Select this to enable cpuidle for Qualcomm processors. The Subsystem Power Manager (SPM) controls low power modes for the diff --git a/drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle-qcom-spm.c b/drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle-qcom-spm.c index adf91a6e4d7d..091453135ea6 100644 --- a/drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle-qcom-spm.c +++ b/drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle-qcom-spm.c @@ -18,146 +18,18 @@ #include <linux/cpuidle.h> #include <linux/cpu_pm.h> #include <linux/qcom_scm.h> +#include <soc/qcom/spm.h> #include <asm/proc-fns.h> #include <asm/suspend.h> #include "dt_idle_states.h" -#define MAX_PMIC_DATA 2 -#define MAX_SEQ_DATA 64 -#define SPM_CTL_INDEX 0x7f -#define SPM_CTL_INDEX_SHIFT 4 -#define SPM_CTL_EN BIT(0) - -enum pm_sleep_mode { - PM_SLEEP_MODE_STBY, - PM_SLEEP_MODE_RET, - PM_SLEEP_MODE_SPC, - PM_SLEEP_MODE_PC, - PM_SLEEP_MODE_NR, -}; - -enum spm_reg { - SPM_REG_CFG, - SPM_REG_SPM_CTL, - SPM_REG_DLY, - SPM_REG_PMIC_DLY, - SPM_REG_PMIC_DATA_0, - SPM_REG_PMIC_DATA_1, - SPM_REG_VCTL, - SPM_REG_SEQ_ENTRY, - SPM_REG_SPM_STS, - SPM_REG_PMIC_STS, - SPM_REG_NR, -}; - -struct spm_reg_data { - const u8 *reg_offset; - u32 spm_cfg; - u32 spm_dly; - u32 pmic_dly; - u32 pmic_data[MAX_PMIC_DATA]; - u8 seq[MAX_SEQ_DATA]; - u8 start_index[PM_SLEEP_MODE_NR]; -}; - -struct spm_driver_data { +struct cpuidle_qcom_spm_data { struct cpuidle_driver cpuidle_driver; - void __iomem *reg_base; - const struct spm_reg_data *reg_data; -}; - -static const u8 spm_reg_offset_v2_1[SPM_REG_NR] = { - [SPM_REG_CFG] = 0x08, - [SPM_REG_SPM_CTL] = 0x30, - [SPM_REG_DLY] = 0x34, - [SPM_REG_SEQ_ENTRY] = 0x80, -}; - -/* SPM register data for 8974, 8084 */ -static const struct spm_reg_data spm_reg_8974_8084_cpu = { - .reg_offset = spm_reg_offset_v2_1, - .spm_cfg = 0x1, - .spm_dly = 0x3C102800, - .seq = { 0x03, 0x0B, 0x0F, 0x00, 0x20, 0x80, 0x10, 0xE8, 0x5B, 0x03, - 0x3B, 0xE8, 0x5B, 0x82, 0x10, 0x0B, 0x30, 0x06, 0x26, 0x30, - 0x0F }, - .start_index[PM_SLEEP_MODE_STBY] = 0, - .start_index[PM_SLEEP_MODE_SPC] = 3, + struct spm_driver_data *spm; }; -static const u8 spm_reg_offset_v1_1[SPM_REG_NR] = { - [SPM_REG_CFG] = 0x08, - [SPM_REG_SPM_CTL] = 0x20, - [SPM_REG_PMIC_DLY] = 0x24, - [SPM_REG_PMIC_DATA_0] = 0x28, - [SPM_REG_PMIC_DATA_1] = 0x2C, - [SPM_REG_SEQ_ENTRY] = 0x80, -}; - -/* SPM register data for 8064 */ -static const struct spm_reg_data spm_reg_8064_cpu = { - .reg_offset = spm_reg_offset_v1_1, - .spm_cfg = 0x1F, - .pmic_dly = 0x02020004, - .pmic_data[0] = 0x0084009C, - .pmic_data[1] = 0x00A4001C, - .seq = { 0x03, 0x0F, 0x00, 0x24, 0x54, 0x10, 0x09, 0x03, 0x01, - 0x10, 0x54, 0x30, 0x0C, 0x24, 0x30, 0x0F }, - .start_index[PM_SLEEP_MODE_STBY] = 0, - .start_index[PM_SLEEP_MODE_SPC] = 2, -}; - -static inline void spm_register_write(struct spm_driver_data *drv, - enum spm_reg reg, u32 val) -{ - if (drv->reg_data->reg_offset[reg]) - writel_relaxed(val, drv->reg_base + - drv->reg_data->reg_offset[reg]); -} - -/* Ensure a guaranteed write, before return */ -static inline void spm_register_write_sync(struct spm_driver_data *drv, - enum spm_reg reg, u32 val) -{ - u32 ret; - - if (!drv->reg_data->reg_offset[reg]) - return; - - do { - writel_relaxed(val, drv->reg_base + - drv->reg_data->reg_offset[reg]); - ret = readl_relaxed(drv->reg_base + - drv->reg_data->reg_offset[reg]); - if (ret == val) - break; - cpu_relax(); - } while (1); -} - -static inline u32 spm_register_read(struct spm_driver_data *drv, - enum spm_reg reg) -{ - return readl_relaxed(drv->reg_base + drv->reg_data->reg_offset[reg]); -} - -static void spm_set_low_power_mode(struct spm_driver_data *drv, - enum pm_sleep_mode mode) -{ - u32 start_index; - u32 ctl_val; - - start_index = drv->reg_data->start_index[mode]; - - ctl_val = spm_register_read(drv, SPM_REG_SPM_CTL); - ctl_val &= ~(SPM_CTL_INDEX << SPM_CTL_INDEX_SHIFT); - ctl_val |= start_index << SPM_CTL_INDEX_SHIFT; - ctl_val |= SPM_CTL_EN; - spm_register_write_sync(drv, SPM_REG_SPM_CTL, ctl_val); -} - static int qcom_pm_collapse(unsigned long int unused) { qcom_scm_cpu_power_down(QCOM_SCM_CPU_PWR_DOWN_L2_ON); @@ -189,156 +61,110 @@ static int qcom_cpu_spc(struct spm_driver_data *drv) static int spm_enter_idle_state(struct cpuidle_device *dev, struct cpuidle_driver *drv, int idx) { - struct spm_driver_data *data = container_of(drv, struct spm_driver_data, - cpuidle_driver); + struct cpuidle_qcom_spm_data *data = container_of(drv, struct cpuidle_qcom_spm_data, + cpuidle_driver); - return CPU_PM_CPU_IDLE_ENTER_PARAM(qcom_cpu_spc, idx, data); + return CPU_PM_CPU_IDLE_ENTER_PARAM(qcom_cpu_spc, idx, data->spm); } -static struct cpuidle_driver qcom_spm_idle_driver = { - .name = "qcom_spm", - .owner = THIS_MODULE, - .states[0] = { - .enter = spm_enter_idle_state, - .exit_latency = 1, - .target_residency = 1, - .power_usage = UINT_MAX, - .name = "WFI", - .desc = "ARM WFI", - } -}; - static const struct of_device_id qcom_idle_state_match[] = { { .compatible = "qcom,idle-state-spc", .data = spm_enter_idle_state }, { }, }; -static int spm_cpuidle_init(struct cpuidle_driver *drv, int cpu) +static int spm_cpuidle_register(int cpu) { + struct platform_device *pdev = NULL; + struct device_node *cpu_node, *saw_node; + struct cpuidle_qcom_spm_data data = { + .cpuidle_driver = { + .name = "qcom_spm", + .owner = THIS_MODULE, + .cpumask = (struct cpumask *)cpumask_of(cpu), + .states[0] = { + .enter = spm_enter_idle_state, + .exit_latency = 1, + .target_residency = 1, + .power_usage = UINT_MAX, + .name = "WFI", + .desc = "ARM WFI", + } + } + }; int ret; - memcpy(drv, &qcom_spm_idle_driver, sizeof(*drv)); - drv->cpumask = (struct cpumask *)cpumask_of(cpu); + cpu_node = of_cpu_device_node_get(cpu); + if (!cpu_node) + return -ENODEV; - /* Parse idle states from device tree */ - ret = dt_init_idle_driver(drv, qcom_idle_state_match, 1); - if (ret <= 0) - return ret ? : -ENODEV; + saw_node = of_parse_phandle(cpu_node, "qcom,saw", 0); + if (!saw_node) + return -ENODEV; - /* We have atleast one power down mode */ - return qcom_scm_set_warm_boot_addr(cpu_resume_arm, drv->cpumask); -} + pdev = of_find_device_by_node(saw_node); + of_node_put(saw_node); + of_node_put(cpu_node); + if (!pdev) + return -ENODEV; -static struct spm_driver_data *spm_get_drv(struct platform_device *pdev, - int *spm_cpu) -{ - struct spm_driver_data *drv = NULL; - struct device_node *cpu_node, *saw_node; - int cpu; - bool found = 0; + data.spm = dev_get_drvdata(&pdev->dev); + if (!data.spm) + return -EINVAL; - for_each_possible_cpu(cpu) { - cpu_node = of_cpu_device_node_get(cpu); - if (!cpu_node) - continue; - saw_node = of_parse_phandle(cpu_node, "qcom,saw", 0); - found = (saw_node == pdev->dev.of_node); - of_node_put(saw_node); - of_node_put(cpu_node); - if (found) - break; - } + ret = dt_init_idle_driver(&data.cpuidle_driver, + qcom_idle_state_match, 1); + if (ret <= 0) + return ret ? : -ENODEV; - if (found) { - drv = devm_kzalloc(&pdev->dev, sizeof(*drv), GFP_KERNEL); - if (drv) - *spm_cpu = cpu; - } + ret = qcom_scm_set_warm_boot_addr(cpu_resume_arm, cpumask_of(cpu)); + if (ret) + return ret; - return drv; + return cpuidle_register(&data.cpuidle_driver, NULL); } -static const struct of_device_id spm_match_table[] = { - { .compatible = "qcom,msm8974-saw2-v2.1-cpu", - .data = &spm_reg_8974_8084_cpu }, - { .compatible = "qcom,apq8084-saw2-v2.1-cpu", - .data = &spm_reg_8974_8084_cpu }, - { .compatible = "qcom,apq8064-saw2-v1.1-cpu", - .data = &spm_reg_8064_cpu }, - { }, -}; - -static int spm_dev_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) +static int spm_cpuidle_drv_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) { - struct spm_driver_data *drv; - struct resource *res; - const struct of_device_id *match_id; - void __iomem *addr; int cpu, ret; if (!qcom_scm_is_available()) return -EPROBE_DEFER; - drv = spm_get_drv(pdev, &cpu); - if (!drv) - return -EINVAL; - platform_set_drvdata(pdev, drv); + for_each_possible_cpu(cpu) { + ret = spm_cpuidle_register(cpu); + if (ret && ret != -ENODEV) { + dev_err(&pdev->dev, + "Cannot register for CPU%d: %d\n", cpu, ret); + break; + } + } - res = platform_get_resource(pdev, IORESOURCE_MEM, 0); - drv->reg_base = devm_ioremap_resource(&pdev->dev, res); - if (IS_ERR(drv->reg_base)) - return PTR_ERR(drv->reg_base); + return ret; +} - match_id = of_match_node(spm_match_table, pdev->dev.of_node); - if (!match_id) - return -ENODEV; +static struct platform_driver spm_cpuidle_driver = { + .probe = spm_cpuidle_drv_probe, + .driver = { + .name = "qcom-spm-cpuidle", + }, +}; - drv->reg_data = match_id->data; +static int __init qcom_spm_cpuidle_init(void) +{ + struct platform_device *pdev; + int ret; - ret = spm_cpuidle_init(&drv->cpuidle_driver, cpu); + ret = platform_driver_register(&spm_cpuidle_driver); if (ret) return ret; - /* Write the SPM sequences first.. */ - addr = drv->reg_base + drv->reg_data->reg_offset[SPM_REG_SEQ_ENTRY]; - __iowrite32_copy(addr, drv->reg_data->seq, - ARRAY_SIZE(drv->reg_data->seq) / 4); - - /* - * ..and then the control registers. - * On some SoC if the control registers are written first and if the - * CPU was held in reset, the reset signal could trigger the SPM state - * machine, before the sequences are completely written. - */ - spm_register_write(drv, SPM_REG_CFG, drv->reg_data->spm_cfg); - spm_register_write(drv, SPM_REG_DLY, drv->reg_data->spm_dly); - spm_register_write(drv, SPM_REG_PMIC_DLY, drv->reg_data->pmic_dly); - spm_register_write(drv, SPM_REG_PMIC_DATA_0, - drv->reg_data->pmic_data[0]); - spm_register_write(drv, SPM_REG_PMIC_DATA_1, - drv->reg_data->pmic_data[1]); - - /* Set up Standby as the default low power mode */ - spm_set_low_power_mode(drv, PM_SLEEP_MODE_STBY); - - return cpuidle_register(&drv->cpuidle_driver, NULL); -} - -static int spm_dev_remove(struct platform_device *pdev) -{ - struct spm_driver_data *drv = platform_get_drvdata(pdev); + pdev = platform_device_register_simple("qcom-spm-cpuidle", + -1, NULL, 0); + if (IS_ERR(pdev)) { + platform_driver_unregister(&spm_cpuidle_driver); + return PTR_ERR(pdev); + } - cpuidle_unregister(&drv->cpuidle_driver); return 0; } - -static struct platform_driver spm_driver = { - .probe = spm_dev_probe, - .remove = spm_dev_remove, - .driver = { - .name = "saw", - .of_match_table = spm_match_table, - }, -}; - -builtin_platform_driver(spm_driver); +device_initcall(qcom_spm_cpuidle_init); diff --git a/drivers/soc/qcom/Kconfig b/drivers/soc/qcom/Kconfig index ac520e5eeefa..10b365f0bb8f 100644 --- a/drivers/soc/qcom/Kconfig +++ b/drivers/soc/qcom/Kconfig @@ -207,6 +207,15 @@ config QCOM_SOCINFO Say yes here to support the Qualcomm socinfo driver, providing information about the SoC to user space. +config QCOM_SPM + tristate "Qualcomm Subsystem Power Manager (SPM)" + depends on ARCH_QCOM + select QCOM_SCM + help + Enable the support for the Qualcomm Subsystem Power Manager, used + to manage cores, L2 low power modes and to configure the internal + Adaptive Voltage Scaler parameters, where supported. + config QCOM_WCNSS_CTRL tristate "Qualcomm WCNSS control driver" depends on ARCH_QCOM || COMPILE_TEST diff --git a/drivers/soc/qcom/Makefile b/drivers/soc/qcom/Makefile index 87a165c0ea10..0500283c2dc5 100644 --- a/drivers/soc/qcom/Makefile +++ b/drivers/soc/qcom/Makefile @@ -21,6 +21,7 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_QCOM_SMEM_STATE) += smem_state.o obj-$(CONFIG_QCOM_SMP2P) += smp2p.o obj-$(CONFIG_QCOM_SMSM) += smsm.o obj-$(CONFIG_QCOM_SOCINFO) += socinfo.o +obj-$(CONFIG_QCOM_SPM) += spm.o obj-$(CONFIG_QCOM_WCNSS_CTRL) += wcnss_ctrl.o obj-$(CONFIG_QCOM_APR) += apr.o obj-$(CONFIG_QCOM_LLCC) += llcc-qcom.o diff --git a/drivers/soc/qcom/spm.c b/drivers/soc/qcom/spm.c new file mode 100644 index 000000000000..9b6f649c9a10 --- /dev/null +++ b/drivers/soc/qcom/spm.c @@ -0,0 +1,198 @@ +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only +/* + * Copyright (c) 2011-2014, The Linux Foundation. All rights reserved. + * Copyright (c) 2014,2015, Linaro Ltd. + * + * SAW power controller driver + */ + +#include <linux/kernel.h> +#include <linux/init.h> +#include <linux/io.h> +#include <linux/slab.h> +#include <linux/of.h> +#include <linux/of_address.h> +#include <linux/of_device.h> +#include <linux/err.h> +#include <linux/platform_device.h> +#include <soc/qcom/spm.h> + +#define SPM_CTL_INDEX 0x7f +#define SPM_CTL_INDEX_SHIFT 4 +#define SPM_CTL_EN BIT(0) + +enum spm_reg { + SPM_REG_CFG, + SPM_REG_SPM_CTL, + SPM_REG_DLY, + SPM_REG_PMIC_DLY, + SPM_REG_PMIC_DATA_0, + SPM_REG_PMIC_DATA_1, + SPM_REG_VCTL, + SPM_REG_SEQ_ENTRY, + SPM_REG_SPM_STS, + SPM_REG_PMIC_STS, + SPM_REG_NR, +}; + +static const u8 spm_reg_offset_v2_1[SPM_REG_NR] = { + [SPM_REG_CFG] = 0x08, + [SPM_REG_SPM_CTL] = 0x30, + [SPM_REG_DLY] = 0x34, + [SPM_REG_SEQ_ENTRY] = 0x80, +}; + +/* SPM register data for 8974, 8084 */ +static const struct spm_reg_data spm_reg_8974_8084_cpu = { + .reg_offset = spm_reg_offset_v2_1, + .spm_cfg = 0x1, + .spm_dly = 0x3C102800, + .seq = { 0x03, 0x0B, 0x0F, 0x00, 0x20, 0x80, 0x10, 0xE8, 0x5B, 0x03, + 0x3B, 0xE8, 0x5B, 0x82, 0x10, 0x0B, 0x30, 0x06, 0x26, 0x30, + 0x0F }, + .start_index[PM_SLEEP_MODE_STBY] = 0, + .start_index[PM_SLEEP_MODE_SPC] = 3, +}; + +static const u8 spm_reg_offset_v1_1[SPM_REG_NR] = { + [SPM_REG_CFG] = 0x08, + [SPM_REG_SPM_CTL] = 0x20, + [SPM_REG_PMIC_DLY] = 0x24, + [SPM_REG_PMIC_DATA_0] = 0x28, + [SPM_REG_PMIC_DATA_1] = 0x2C, + [SPM_REG_SEQ_ENTRY] = 0x80, +}; + +/* SPM register data for 8064 */ +static const struct spm_reg_data spm_reg_8064_cpu = { + .reg_offset = spm_reg_offset_v1_1, + .spm_cfg = 0x1F, + .pmic_dly = 0x02020004, + .pmic_data[0] = 0x0084009C, + .pmic_data[1] = 0x00A4001C, + .seq = { 0x03, 0x0F, 0x00, 0x24, 0x54, 0x10, 0x09, 0x03, 0x01, + 0x10, 0x54, 0x30, 0x0C, 0x24, 0x30, 0x0F }, + .start_index[PM_SLEEP_MODE_STBY] = 0, + .start_index[PM_SLEEP_MODE_SPC] = 2, +}; + +static inline void spm_register_write(struct spm_driver_data *drv, + enum spm_reg reg, u32 val) +{ + if (drv->reg_data->reg_offset[reg]) + writel_relaxed(val, drv->reg_base + + drv->reg_data->reg_offset[reg]); +} + +/* Ensure a guaranteed write, before return */ +static inline void spm_register_write_sync(struct spm_driver_data *drv, + enum spm_reg reg, u32 val) +{ + u32 ret; + + if (!drv->reg_data->reg_offset[reg]) + return; + + do { + writel_relaxed(val, drv->reg_base + + drv->reg_data->reg_offset[reg]); + ret = readl_relaxed(drv->reg_base + + drv->reg_data->reg_offset[reg]); + if (ret == val) + break; + cpu_relax(); + } while (1); +} + +static inline u32 spm_register_read(struct spm_driver_data *drv, + enum spm_reg reg) +{ + return readl_relaxed(drv->reg_base + drv->reg_data->reg_offset[reg]); +} + +void spm_set_low_power_mode(struct spm_driver_data *drv, + enum pm_sleep_mode mode) +{ + u32 start_index; + u32 ctl_val; + + start_index = drv->reg_data->start_index[mode]; + + ctl_val = spm_register_read(drv, SPM_REG_SPM_CTL); + ctl_val &= ~(SPM_CTL_INDEX << SPM_CTL_INDEX_SHIFT); + ctl_val |= start_index << SPM_CTL_INDEX_SHIFT; + ctl_val |= SPM_CTL_EN; + spm_register_write_sync(drv, SPM_REG_SPM_CTL, ctl_val); +} + +static const struct of_device_id spm_match_table[] = { + { .compatible = "qcom,msm8974-saw2-v2.1-cpu", + .data = &spm_reg_8974_8084_cpu }, + { .compatible = "qcom,apq8084-saw2-v2.1-cpu", + .data = &spm_reg_8974_8084_cpu }, + { .compatible = "qcom,apq8064-saw2-v1.1-cpu", + .data = &spm_reg_8064_cpu }, + { }, +}; + +static int spm_dev_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) +{ + const struct of_device_id *match_id; + struct spm_driver_data *drv; + struct resource *res; + void __iomem *addr; + + drv = devm_kzalloc(&pdev->dev, sizeof(*drv), GFP_KERNEL); + if (!drv) + return -ENOMEM; + + res = platform_get_resource(pdev, IORESOURCE_MEM, 0); + drv->reg_base = devm_ioremap_resource(&pdev->dev, res); + if (IS_ERR(drv->reg_base)) + return PTR_ERR(drv->reg_base); + + match_id = of_match_node(spm_match_table, pdev->dev.of_node); + if (!match_id) + return -ENODEV; + + drv->reg_data = match_id->data; + platform_set_drvdata(pdev, drv); + + /* Write the SPM sequences first.. */ + addr = drv->reg_base + drv->reg_data->reg_offset[SPM_REG_SEQ_ENTRY]; + __iowrite32_copy(addr, drv->reg_data->seq, + ARRAY_SIZE(drv->reg_data->seq) / 4); + + /* + * ..and then the control registers. + * On some SoC if the control registers are written first and if the + * CPU was held in reset, the reset signal could trigger the SPM state + * machine, before the sequences are completely written. + */ + spm_register_write(drv, SPM_REG_CFG, drv->reg_data->spm_cfg); + spm_register_write(drv, SPM_REG_DLY, drv->reg_data->spm_dly); + spm_register_write(drv, SPM_REG_PMIC_DLY, drv->reg_data->pmic_dly); + spm_register_write(drv, SPM_REG_PMIC_DATA_0, + drv->reg_data->pmic_data[0]); + spm_register_write(drv, SPM_REG_PMIC_DATA_1, + drv->reg_data->pmic_data[1]); + + /* Set up Standby as the default low power mode */ + spm_set_low_power_mode(drv, PM_SLEEP_MODE_STBY); + + return 0; +} + +static struct platform_driver spm_driver = { + .probe = spm_dev_probe, + .driver = { + .name = "qcom_spm", + .of_match_table = spm_match_table, + }, +}; + +static int __init qcom_spm_init(void) +{ + return platform_driver_register(&spm_driver); +} +arch_initcall(qcom_spm_init); diff --git a/include/soc/qcom/spm.h b/include/soc/qcom/spm.h new file mode 100644 index 000000000000..4c7e5ac2583d --- /dev/null +++ b/include/soc/qcom/spm.h @@ -0,0 +1,41 @@ +/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only */ +/* + * Copyright (c) 2011-2014, The Linux Foundation. All rights reserved. + * Copyright (c) 2014,2015, Linaro Ltd. + */ + +#ifndef __SPM_H__ +#define __SPM_H__ + +#include <linux/cpuidle.h> + +#define MAX_PMIC_DATA 2 +#define MAX_SEQ_DATA 64 + +enum pm_sleep_mode { + PM_SLEEP_MODE_STBY, + PM_SLEEP_MODE_RET, + PM_SLEEP_MODE_SPC, + PM_SLEEP_MODE_PC, + PM_SLEEP_MODE_NR, +}; + +struct spm_reg_data { + const u8 *reg_offset; + u32 spm_cfg; + u32 spm_dly; + u32 pmic_dly; + u32 pmic_data[MAX_PMIC_DATA]; + u8 seq[MAX_SEQ_DATA]; + u8 start_index[PM_SLEEP_MODE_NR]; +}; + +struct spm_driver_data { + void __iomem *reg_base; + const struct spm_reg_data *reg_data; +}; + +void spm_set_low_power_mode(struct spm_driver_data *drv, + enum pm_sleep_mode mode); + +#endif /* __SPM_H__ */
In commit a871be6b8eee ("cpuidle: Convert Qualcomm SPM driver to a generic CPUidle driver") the SPM driver has been converted to a generic CPUidle driver: that was mainly made to simplify the driver and that was a great accomplishment; Though, it was ignored that the SPM driver is not used only on the ARM architecture. In preparation for the enablement of SPM features on AArch64/ARM64, split the cpuidle-qcom-spm driver in two: the CPUIdle related state machine (currently used only on ARM SoCs) stays there, while the SPM communication handling lands back in soc/qcom/spm.c and also making sure to not discard the simplifications that were introduced in the aforementioned commit. Since now the "two drivers" are split, the SCM dependency in the main SPM handling is gone and for this reason it was also possible to move the SPM initialization early: this will also make sure that whenever the SAW CPUIdle driver is getting initialized, the SPM driver will be ready to do the job. Please note that the anticipation of the SPM initialization was also done to optimize the boot times on platforms that have their CPU/L2 idle states managed by other means (such as PSCI), while needing SAW initialization for other purposes, like AVS control. Signed-off-by: AngeloGioacchino Del Regno <angelogioacchino.delregno@somainline.org> --- drivers/cpuidle/Kconfig.arm | 1 + drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle-qcom-spm.c | 324 +++++++---------------------- drivers/soc/qcom/Kconfig | 9 + drivers/soc/qcom/Makefile | 1 + drivers/soc/qcom/spm.c | 198 ++++++++++++++++++ include/soc/qcom/spm.h | 41 ++++ 6 files changed, 325 insertions(+), 249 deletions(-) create mode 100644 drivers/soc/qcom/spm.c create mode 100644 include/soc/qcom/spm.h