Message ID | 20220505113802.243301-2-krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
State | Superseded |
Headers | show |
Series | [1/6] dt-bindings: nvmem: qfprom: add IPQ8064 and SDM630 compatibles | expand |
On 05/05/2022 13:37, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: > Use dedicated compatibles for QFPROM on APQ8064, IPQ8064 and MSM9874, > which is expected by the bindings. > > Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org> > --- > arch/arm/boot/dts/qcom-apq8064.dtsi | 2 +- > arch/arm/boot/dts/qcom-apq8084.dtsi | 2 +- > arch/arm/boot/dts/qcom-ipq8064.dtsi | 2 +- > arch/arm/boot/dts/qcom-msm8974.dtsi | 2 +- > 4 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) > I'll take the bindings (patch #1) but what about DTS here? Any comments? Best regards, Krzysztof
On 20/06/2022 21:11, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: > On 05/05/2022 13:37, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: >> Use dedicated compatibles for QFPROM on APQ8064, IPQ8064 and MSM9874, >> which is expected by the bindings. >> >> Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org> >> --- >> arch/arm/boot/dts/qcom-apq8064.dtsi | 2 +- >> arch/arm/boot/dts/qcom-apq8084.dtsi | 2 +- >> arch/arm/boot/dts/qcom-ipq8064.dtsi | 2 +- >> arch/arm/boot/dts/qcom-msm8974.dtsi | 2 +- >> 4 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) >> > > I'll take the bindings (patch #1) but what about DTS here? Any comments? Then I assume there is no problem me taking it. Best regards, Krzysztof
On Thu, 5 May 2022 13:37:58 +0200, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: > Use dedicated compatibles for QFPROM on APQ8064, IPQ8064 and MSM9874, > which is expected by the bindings. > > Applied, thanks! [2/6] ARM: dts: qcom: use dedicated QFPROM compatibles https://git.kernel.org/krzk/linux/c/ed07c2af405fd6f7508997a3b55a74e1d16f467c Best regards,
diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/qcom-apq8064.dtsi b/arch/arm/boot/dts/qcom-apq8064.dtsi index 34c0ba7fa358..3bf870b7de00 100644 --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/qcom-apq8064.dtsi +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/qcom-apq8064.dtsi @@ -796,7 +796,7 @@ ref_muxoff: adc-channel@f { }; qfprom: qfprom@700000 { - compatible = "qcom,qfprom"; + compatible = "qcom,apq8064-qfprom", "qcom,qfprom"; reg = <0x00700000 0x1000>; #address-cells = <1>; #size-cells = <1>; diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/qcom-apq8084.dtsi b/arch/arm/boot/dts/qcom-apq8084.dtsi index da50a1a0197f..503b4ae9fb1a 100644 --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/qcom-apq8084.dtsi +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/qcom-apq8084.dtsi @@ -242,7 +242,7 @@ apcs: syscon@f9011000 { qfprom: qfprom@fc4bc000 { #address-cells = <1>; #size-cells = <1>; - compatible = "qcom,qfprom"; + compatible = "qcom,apq8084-qfprom", "qcom,qfprom"; reg = <0xfc4bc000 0x1000>; tsens_calib: calib@d0 { reg = <0xd0 0x18>; diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/qcom-ipq8064.dtsi b/arch/arm/boot/dts/qcom-ipq8064.dtsi index 808ea1862283..b3c0d140e6a0 100644 --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/qcom-ipq8064.dtsi +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/qcom-ipq8064.dtsi @@ -723,7 +723,7 @@ qcom,ssbi@500000 { }; qfprom: qfprom@700000 { - compatible = "qcom,qfprom"; + compatible = "qcom,ipq8064-qfprom", "qcom,qfprom"; reg = <0x00700000 0x1000>; #address-cells = <1>; #size-cells = <1>; diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/qcom-msm8974.dtsi b/arch/arm/boot/dts/qcom-msm8974.dtsi index 814ad0b46232..5d2ab5ceb65c 100644 --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/qcom-msm8974.dtsi +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/qcom-msm8974.dtsi @@ -1120,7 +1120,7 @@ restart@fc4ab000 { qfprom: qfprom@fc4bc000 { #address-cells = <1>; #size-cells = <1>; - compatible = "qcom,qfprom"; + compatible = "qcom,msm8974-qfprom", "qcom,qfprom"; reg = <0xfc4bc000 0x1000>; tsens_calib: calib@d0 { reg = <0xd0 0x18>;
Use dedicated compatibles for QFPROM on APQ8064, IPQ8064 and MSM9874, which is expected by the bindings. Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org> --- arch/arm/boot/dts/qcom-apq8064.dtsi | 2 +- arch/arm/boot/dts/qcom-apq8084.dtsi | 2 +- arch/arm/boot/dts/qcom-ipq8064.dtsi | 2 +- arch/arm/boot/dts/qcom-msm8974.dtsi | 2 +- 4 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)