diff mbox series

[RESEND] arm64: dts: qcom: sm6125: fix SDHCI CQE reg names

Message ID 20221026163646.37433-1-krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org (mailing list archive)
State Accepted
Headers show
Series [RESEND] arm64: dts: qcom: sm6125: fix SDHCI CQE reg names | expand

Commit Message

Krzysztof Kozlowski Oct. 26, 2022, 4:36 p.m. UTC
SM6125 comes with SDCC (SDHCI controller) v5, so the second range of
registers is cqhci, not core.

Fixes: cff4bbaf2a2d ("arm64: dts: qcom: Add support for SM6125")
Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org>

---

Not tested on hardware, but no practical impact is expected, because
supports-cqe is not defined.
---
 arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sm6125.dtsi | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

Comments

Marijn Suijten Nov. 7, 2022, 9:42 p.m. UTC | #1
On 2022-10-26 12:36:46, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> SM6125 comes with SDCC (SDHCI controller) v5, so the second range of
> registers is cqhci, not core.
> 
> Fixes: cff4bbaf2a2d ("arm64: dts: qcom: Add support for SM6125")
> Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org>
> 
> ---
> 
> Not tested on hardware, but no practical impact is expected, because
> supports-cqe is not defined.

Thanks for this!  According to my downstream sources this reg is called
cmdq_mem, that's not core indeed.

Reviewed-by: Marijn Suijten <marijn.suijten@somainline.org>
Tested-by: Marijn Suijten <marijn.suijten@somainline.org> # Sony Xperia 10 II

And also according to my downstream sources, this SoC should support it.
When adding supports-cqe _together with your patch_:

    [    0.391950] sdhci_msm 4744000.mmc: mmc0: CQE init: success

I'll send a followup to that effect.  Thanks again for bringing this to
my attention!

- Marijn

> ---
>  arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sm6125.dtsi | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sm6125.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sm6125.dtsi
> index af49a748e511..24ee7c0c1195 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sm6125.dtsi
> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sm6125.dtsi
> @@ -458,7 +458,7 @@ rpm_msg_ram: sram@45f0000 {
>  		sdhc_1: mmc@4744000 {
>  			compatible = "qcom,sm6125-sdhci", "qcom,sdhci-msm-v5";
>  			reg = <0x04744000 0x1000>, <0x04745000 0x1000>;
> -			reg-names = "hc", "core";
> +			reg-names = "hc", "cqhci";
>  
>  			interrupts = <GIC_SPI 348 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>,
>  				     <GIC_SPI 352 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>;
> -- 
> 2.34.1
>
Bjorn Andersson Nov. 8, 2022, 1:34 a.m. UTC | #2
On Wed, 26 Oct 2022 12:36:46 -0400, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> SM6125 comes with SDCC (SDHCI controller) v5, so the second range of
> registers is cqhci, not core.
> 
> 

Applied, thanks!

[1/1] arm64: dts: qcom: sm6125: fix SDHCI CQE reg names
      commit: 3de1172624b3c4ca65730bc34333ab493510b3e1

Best regards,
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sm6125.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sm6125.dtsi
index af49a748e511..24ee7c0c1195 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sm6125.dtsi
+++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sm6125.dtsi
@@ -458,7 +458,7 @@  rpm_msg_ram: sram@45f0000 {
 		sdhc_1: mmc@4744000 {
 			compatible = "qcom,sm6125-sdhci", "qcom,sdhci-msm-v5";
 			reg = <0x04744000 0x1000>, <0x04745000 0x1000>;
-			reg-names = "hc", "core";
+			reg-names = "hc", "cqhci";
 
 			interrupts = <GIC_SPI 348 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>,
 				     <GIC_SPI 352 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>;