| Message ID | 20221207012231.112059-4-dmitry.baryshkov@linaro.org (mailing list archive) |
|---|---|
| State | Not Applicable |
| Headers | show |
| Series | drm/msm: add support for SM8450 | expand |
On 07/12/2022 02:22, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote: > SM8350 and SM8450 platforms use the same driver and same bindings as the > existing 7nm DSI PHYs. Add corresponding compatibility strings. > > Acked-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org> > Signed-off-by: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@linaro.org> > --- > Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/msm/dsi-phy-7nm.yaml | 2 ++ > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/msm/dsi-phy-7nm.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/msm/dsi-phy-7nm.yaml > index c851770bbdf2..bffd161fedfd 100644 > --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/msm/dsi-phy-7nm.yaml > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/msm/dsi-phy-7nm.yaml > @@ -15,6 +15,8 @@ allOf: > properties: > compatible: > enum: > + - qcom,dsi-phy-5nm-8350 > + - qcom,dsi-phy-5nm-8450 If this patch was not merged (so far nothing in next), can we make it proper SoC compatible? qcom,sm8450-dsi-phy-5nm The SC7280 already uses such pattern. > - qcom,dsi-phy-7nm > - qcom,dsi-phy-7nm-8150 > - qcom,sc7280-dsi-phy-7nm Best regards, Krzysztof
On 06/01/2023 17:39, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: > On 07/12/2022 02:22, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote: >> SM8350 and SM8450 platforms use the same driver and same bindings as the >> existing 7nm DSI PHYs. Add corresponding compatibility strings. >> >> Acked-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org> >> Signed-off-by: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@linaro.org> >> --- >> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/msm/dsi-phy-7nm.yaml | 2 ++ >> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+) >> >> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/msm/dsi-phy-7nm.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/msm/dsi-phy-7nm.yaml >> index c851770bbdf2..bffd161fedfd 100644 >> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/msm/dsi-phy-7nm.yaml >> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/msm/dsi-phy-7nm.yaml >> @@ -15,6 +15,8 @@ allOf: >> properties: >> compatible: >> enum: >> + - qcom,dsi-phy-5nm-8350 >> + - qcom,dsi-phy-5nm-8450 > > If this patch was not merged (so far nothing in next), can we make it > proper SoC compatible? Ack. Bjorn has merged the dtsi bits, but I'll send a fixup. > > qcom,sm8450-dsi-phy-5nm > > The SC7280 already uses such pattern. > >> - qcom,dsi-phy-7nm >> - qcom,dsi-phy-7nm-8150 >> - qcom,sc7280-dsi-phy-7nm > > Best regards, > Krzysztof >
diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/msm/dsi-phy-7nm.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/msm/dsi-phy-7nm.yaml index c851770bbdf2..bffd161fedfd 100644 --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/msm/dsi-phy-7nm.yaml +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/msm/dsi-phy-7nm.yaml @@ -15,6 +15,8 @@ allOf: properties: compatible: enum: + - qcom,dsi-phy-5nm-8350 + - qcom,dsi-phy-5nm-8450 - qcom,dsi-phy-7nm - qcom,dsi-phy-7nm-8150 - qcom,sc7280-dsi-phy-7nm