| Message ID | 20230201101559.15529-16-johan+linaro@kernel.org (mailing list archive) |
|---|---|
| State | Superseded |
| Headers | show |
| Series | interconnect: fix racy provider registration | expand |
On 01/02/2023 11:15, Johan Hovold wrote: > The current interconnect provider registration interface is inherently > racy as nodes are not added until the after adding the provider. This > can specifically cause racing DT lookups to trigger a NULL-pointer > deference when either a NULL pointer or not fully initialised node is > returned from exynos_generic_icc_xlate(). > > Switch to using the new API where the provider is not registered until > after it has been fully initialised. > > Fixes: 2f95b9d5cf0b ("interconnect: Add generic interconnect driver for Exynos SoCs") > Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # 5.11 > Cc: Sylwester Nawrocki <s.nawrocki@samsung.com> > Signed-off-by: Johan Hovold <johan+linaro@kernel.org> > --- > drivers/interconnect/samsung/exynos.c | 20 ++++++++++---------- > 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/interconnect/samsung/exynos.c b/drivers/interconnect/samsung/exynos.c > index e70665899482..72e42603823b 100644 > --- a/drivers/interconnect/samsung/exynos.c > +++ b/drivers/interconnect/samsung/exynos.c > @@ -98,12 +98,13 @@ static int exynos_generic_icc_remove(struct platform_device *pdev) > struct exynos_icc_priv *priv = platform_get_drvdata(pdev); > struct icc_node *parent_node, *node = priv->node; > > + icc_provider_deregister(&priv->provider); > + > parent_node = exynos_icc_get_parent(priv->dev->parent->of_node); > if (parent_node && !IS_ERR(parent_node)) > icc_link_destroy(node, parent_node); > > icc_nodes_remove(&priv->provider); > - icc_provider_del(&priv->provider); > > return 0; > } > @@ -132,15 +133,11 @@ static int exynos_generic_icc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) > provider->inter_set = true; > provider->data = priv; > > - ret = icc_provider_add(provider); > - if (ret < 0) > - return ret; > + icc_provider_init(provider); > > icc_node = icc_node_create(pdev->id); > - if (IS_ERR(icc_node)) { > - ret = PTR_ERR(icc_node); > - goto err_prov_del; > - } > + if (IS_ERR(icc_node)) > + return PTR_ERR(icc_node); > > priv->node = icc_node; > icc_node->name = devm_kasprintf(&pdev->dev, GFP_KERNEL, "%pOFn", > @@ -171,14 +168,17 @@ static int exynos_generic_icc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) > goto err_pmqos_del; > } > > + ret = icc_provider_register(provider); > + if (ret < 0) > + goto err_pmqos_del; If I understand correctly there is no need for icc_link_destroy() in error path here, right? Even in case of probe retry (defer or whatever reason) - the link will be removed with icc_nodes_remove()? Best regards, Krzysztof
On Thu, Feb 02, 2023 at 12:04:49PM +0100, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: > On 01/02/2023 11:15, Johan Hovold wrote: > > @@ -98,12 +98,13 @@ static int exynos_generic_icc_remove(struct platform_device *pdev) > > struct exynos_icc_priv *priv = platform_get_drvdata(pdev); > > struct icc_node *parent_node, *node = priv->node; > > > > + icc_provider_deregister(&priv->provider); > > + > > parent_node = exynos_icc_get_parent(priv->dev->parent->of_node); > > if (parent_node && !IS_ERR(parent_node)) > > icc_link_destroy(node, parent_node); > > > > icc_nodes_remove(&priv->provider); > > - icc_provider_del(&priv->provider); > > > > return 0; > > } > > @@ -132,15 +133,11 @@ static int exynos_generic_icc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) > > provider->inter_set = true; > > provider->data = priv; > > > > - ret = icc_provider_add(provider); > > - if (ret < 0) > > - return ret; > > + icc_provider_init(provider); > > > > icc_node = icc_node_create(pdev->id); > > - if (IS_ERR(icc_node)) { > > - ret = PTR_ERR(icc_node); > > - goto err_prov_del; > > - } > > + if (IS_ERR(icc_node)) > > + return PTR_ERR(icc_node); > > > > priv->node = icc_node; > > icc_node->name = devm_kasprintf(&pdev->dev, GFP_KERNEL, "%pOFn", > > @@ -171,14 +168,17 @@ static int exynos_generic_icc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) > > goto err_pmqos_del; > > } > > > > + ret = icc_provider_register(provider); > > + if (ret < 0) > > + goto err_pmqos_del; > > If I understand correctly there is no need for icc_link_destroy() in > error path here, right? Even in case of probe retry (defer or whatever > reason) - the link will be removed with icc_nodes_remove()? Correct, it is no longer needed after the first patch in this series. The exynos driver was the only driver that bothered to remove links explicitly, all the others expected the interconnect framework to do so when destroying nodes even if that was not case until now. Johan
On 02/02/2023 13:17, Johan Hovold wrote: > On Thu, Feb 02, 2023 at 12:04:49PM +0100, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: >> On 01/02/2023 11:15, Johan Hovold wrote: > Reviewed-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org> Best regards, Krzysztof
diff --git a/drivers/interconnect/samsung/exynos.c b/drivers/interconnect/samsung/exynos.c index e70665899482..72e42603823b 100644 --- a/drivers/interconnect/samsung/exynos.c +++ b/drivers/interconnect/samsung/exynos.c @@ -98,12 +98,13 @@ static int exynos_generic_icc_remove(struct platform_device *pdev) struct exynos_icc_priv *priv = platform_get_drvdata(pdev); struct icc_node *parent_node, *node = priv->node; + icc_provider_deregister(&priv->provider); + parent_node = exynos_icc_get_parent(priv->dev->parent->of_node); if (parent_node && !IS_ERR(parent_node)) icc_link_destroy(node, parent_node); icc_nodes_remove(&priv->provider); - icc_provider_del(&priv->provider); return 0; } @@ -132,15 +133,11 @@ static int exynos_generic_icc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) provider->inter_set = true; provider->data = priv; - ret = icc_provider_add(provider); - if (ret < 0) - return ret; + icc_provider_init(provider); icc_node = icc_node_create(pdev->id); - if (IS_ERR(icc_node)) { - ret = PTR_ERR(icc_node); - goto err_prov_del; - } + if (IS_ERR(icc_node)) + return PTR_ERR(icc_node); priv->node = icc_node; icc_node->name = devm_kasprintf(&pdev->dev, GFP_KERNEL, "%pOFn", @@ -171,14 +168,17 @@ static int exynos_generic_icc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) goto err_pmqos_del; } + ret = icc_provider_register(provider); + if (ret < 0) + goto err_pmqos_del; + return 0; err_pmqos_del: dev_pm_qos_remove_request(&priv->qos_req); err_node_del: icc_nodes_remove(provider); -err_prov_del: - icc_provider_del(provider); + return ret; }
The current interconnect provider registration interface is inherently racy as nodes are not added until the after adding the provider. This can specifically cause racing DT lookups to trigger a NULL-pointer deference when either a NULL pointer or not fully initialised node is returned from exynos_generic_icc_xlate(). Switch to using the new API where the provider is not registered until after it has been fully initialised. Fixes: 2f95b9d5cf0b ("interconnect: Add generic interconnect driver for Exynos SoCs") Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # 5.11 Cc: Sylwester Nawrocki <s.nawrocki@samsung.com> Signed-off-by: Johan Hovold <johan+linaro@kernel.org> --- drivers/interconnect/samsung/exynos.c | 20 ++++++++++---------- 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)