Message ID | 20230509-ocmem-hwver-v2-1-8c8793a07dfc@z3ntu.xyz (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
State | Superseded |
Headers | show |
Series | [v2] soc: qcom: ocmem: Add OCMEM hardware version print | expand |
On 23.05.2023 22:32, Luca Weiss wrote: > It might be useful to know what hardware version of the OCMEM block the > SoC contains. Add a debug print for that. > > Signed-off-by: Luca Weiss <luca@z3ntu.xyz> > --- > This patch is depends on [0] but could also be applied in the other > order, if conflicts are resolved. > > [0] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-arm-msm/20230506-msm8226-ocmem-v1-1-3e24e2724f01@z3ntu.xyz/ > --- > Changes in v2: > - Use FIELD_GET macros for getting correct bits from register (take > wording from mdp5: major, minor, step which hopefully is sort of > accurate) Qualcomm uses that (or that-ish) nomenclature for many hw blocks, so it's likely spot on. > - Link to v1: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230509-ocmem-hwver-v1-1-b83ece3f2168@z3ntu.xyz > --- > drivers/soc/qcom/ocmem.c | 9 +++++++++ > 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/drivers/soc/qcom/ocmem.c b/drivers/soc/qcom/ocmem.c > index c3e78411c637..9f7c3348cbb9 100644 > --- a/drivers/soc/qcom/ocmem.c > +++ b/drivers/soc/qcom/ocmem.c > @@ -76,6 +76,10 @@ struct ocmem { > #define OCMEM_REG_GFX_MPU_START 0x00001004 > #define OCMEM_REG_GFX_MPU_END 0x00001008 > > +#define OCMEM_HW_VERSION_MAJOR(val) FIELD_GET(GENMASK(31, 28), val) > +#define OCMEM_HW_VERSION_MINOR(val) FIELD_GET(GENMASK(27, 16), val) > +#define OCMEM_HW_VERSION_STEP(val) FIELD_GET(GENMASK(15, 0), val) > + > #define OCMEM_HW_PROFILE_NUM_PORTS(val) FIELD_GET(0x0000000f, (val)) > #define OCMEM_HW_PROFILE_NUM_MACROS(val) FIELD_GET(0x00003f00, (val)) > > @@ -355,6 +359,11 @@ static int ocmem_dev_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) > } > } > > + reg = ocmem_read(ocmem, OCMEM_REG_HW_VERSION); > + dev_dbg(dev, "OCMEM hardware version: %ld.%ld.%ld\n", reg is an unsigned long (u32), this should probably be %u > + OCMEM_HW_VERSION_MAJOR(reg), OCMEM_HW_VERSION_MINOR(reg), > + OCMEM_HW_VERSION_STEP(reg)); Nit: one per line would make this the tiniest bit easier to read Konrad > + > reg = ocmem_read(ocmem, OCMEM_REG_HW_PROFILE); > ocmem->num_ports = OCMEM_HW_PROFILE_NUM_PORTS(reg); > ocmem->num_macros = OCMEM_HW_PROFILE_NUM_MACROS(reg); > > --- > base-commit: 8705151771af822ac794b44504cd72eebc423499 > change-id: 20230509-ocmem-hwver-99bcb33b028b > > Best regards,
On Freitag, 26. Mai 2023 21:39:44 CEST Konrad Dybcio wrote: > On 23.05.2023 22:32, Luca Weiss wrote: > > It might be useful to know what hardware version of the OCMEM block the > > SoC contains. Add a debug print for that. > > > > Signed-off-by: Luca Weiss <luca@z3ntu.xyz> > > --- > > This patch is depends on [0] but could also be applied in the other > > order, if conflicts are resolved. > > > > [0] > > https://lore.kernel.org/linux-arm-msm/20230506-msm8226-ocmem-v1-1-3e24e27 > > 24f01@z3ntu.xyz/ --- > > Changes in v2: > > - Use FIELD_GET macros for getting correct bits from register (take > > > > wording from mdp5: major, minor, step which hopefully is sort of > > accurate) > > Qualcomm uses that (or that-ish) nomenclature for many hw blocks, so > it's likely spot on. > > > - Link to v1: > > https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230509-ocmem-hwver-v1-1-b83ece3f2168@z3ntu.xy > > z --- > > > > drivers/soc/qcom/ocmem.c | 9 +++++++++ > > 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+) > > > > diff --git a/drivers/soc/qcom/ocmem.c b/drivers/soc/qcom/ocmem.c > > index c3e78411c637..9f7c3348cbb9 100644 > > --- a/drivers/soc/qcom/ocmem.c > > +++ b/drivers/soc/qcom/ocmem.c > > @@ -76,6 +76,10 @@ struct ocmem { > > > > #define OCMEM_REG_GFX_MPU_START 0x00001004 > > #define OCMEM_REG_GFX_MPU_END 0x00001008 > > > > +#define OCMEM_HW_VERSION_MAJOR(val) FIELD_GET(GENMASK(31, 28), val) > > +#define OCMEM_HW_VERSION_MINOR(val) FIELD_GET(GENMASK(27, 16), val) > > +#define OCMEM_HW_VERSION_STEP(val) FIELD_GET(GENMASK(15, 0), val) > > + > > > > #define OCMEM_HW_PROFILE_NUM_PORTS(val) FIELD_GET(0x0000000f, (val)) > > #define OCMEM_HW_PROFILE_NUM_MACROS(val) FIELD_GET(0x00003f00, (val)) > > > > @@ -355,6 +359,11 @@ static int ocmem_dev_probe(struct platform_device > > *pdev)> > > } > > > > } > > > > + reg = ocmem_read(ocmem, OCMEM_REG_HW_VERSION); > > + dev_dbg(dev, "OCMEM hardware version: %ld.%ld.%ld\n", > > reg is an unsigned long (u32), this should probably be %u I can make it %lu, just %u gives me this warning drivers/soc/qcom/ocmem.c:363:22: warning: format '%u' expects argument of type 'unsigned int', but argument 6 has type 'long unsigned int' [-Wformat=] 363 | dev_dbg(dev, "OCMEM hardware version: %u.%u.%u\n", | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Will send a v3 with that. > > > + OCMEM_HW_VERSION_MAJOR(reg), OCMEM_HW_VERSION_MINOR(reg), > > + OCMEM_HW_VERSION_STEP(reg)); > > Nit: one per line would make this the tiniest bit easier to read ack Regards Luca > > Konrad > > > + > > > > reg = ocmem_read(ocmem, OCMEM_REG_HW_PROFILE); > > ocmem->num_ports = OCMEM_HW_PROFILE_NUM_PORTS(reg); > > ocmem->num_macros = OCMEM_HW_PROFILE_NUM_MACROS(reg); > > > > --- > > base-commit: 8705151771af822ac794b44504cd72eebc423499 > > change-id: 20230509-ocmem-hwver-99bcb33b028b > > > > Best regards,
On 29.05.2023 10:38, Luca Weiss wrote: > On Freitag, 26. Mai 2023 21:39:44 CEST Konrad Dybcio wrote: >> On 23.05.2023 22:32, Luca Weiss wrote: >>> It might be useful to know what hardware version of the OCMEM block the >>> SoC contains. Add a debug print for that. >>> >>> Signed-off-by: Luca Weiss <luca@z3ntu.xyz> >>> --- >>> This patch is depends on [0] but could also be applied in the other >>> order, if conflicts are resolved. >>> >>> [0] >>> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-arm-msm/20230506-msm8226-ocmem-v1-1-3e24e27 >>> 24f01@z3ntu.xyz/ --- >>> Changes in v2: >>> - Use FIELD_GET macros for getting correct bits from register (take >>> >>> wording from mdp5: major, minor, step which hopefully is sort of >>> accurate) >> >> Qualcomm uses that (or that-ish) nomenclature for many hw blocks, so >> it's likely spot on. >> >>> - Link to v1: >>> https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230509-ocmem-hwver-v1-1-b83ece3f2168@z3ntu.xy >>> z --- >>> >>> drivers/soc/qcom/ocmem.c | 9 +++++++++ >>> 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+) >>> >>> diff --git a/drivers/soc/qcom/ocmem.c b/drivers/soc/qcom/ocmem.c >>> index c3e78411c637..9f7c3348cbb9 100644 >>> --- a/drivers/soc/qcom/ocmem.c >>> +++ b/drivers/soc/qcom/ocmem.c >>> @@ -76,6 +76,10 @@ struct ocmem { >>> >>> #define OCMEM_REG_GFX_MPU_START 0x00001004 >>> #define OCMEM_REG_GFX_MPU_END 0x00001008 >>> >>> +#define OCMEM_HW_VERSION_MAJOR(val) FIELD_GET(GENMASK(31, 28), val) >>> +#define OCMEM_HW_VERSION_MINOR(val) FIELD_GET(GENMASK(27, 16), val) >>> +#define OCMEM_HW_VERSION_STEP(val) FIELD_GET(GENMASK(15, 0), val) >>> + >>> >>> #define OCMEM_HW_PROFILE_NUM_PORTS(val) FIELD_GET(0x0000000f, (val)) >>> #define OCMEM_HW_PROFILE_NUM_MACROS(val) FIELD_GET(0x00003f00, (val)) >>> >>> @@ -355,6 +359,11 @@ static int ocmem_dev_probe(struct platform_device >>> *pdev)> >>> } >>> >>> } >>> >>> + reg = ocmem_read(ocmem, OCMEM_REG_HW_VERSION); >>> + dev_dbg(dev, "OCMEM hardware version: %ld.%ld.%ld\n", >> >> reg is an unsigned long (u32), this should probably be %u > > I can make it %lu, just %u gives me this warning Right, grumpy compilers care about types that have been meaningless for longer than I've been alive.. Konrad > > drivers/soc/qcom/ocmem.c:363:22: warning: format '%u' expects argument of type 'unsigned int', but argument 6 has type 'long unsigned int' [-Wformat=] > 363 | dev_dbg(dev, "OCMEM hardware version: %u.%u.%u\n", > | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ > > > Will send a v3 with that. > >> >>> + OCMEM_HW_VERSION_MAJOR(reg), OCMEM_HW_VERSION_MINOR(reg), >>> + OCMEM_HW_VERSION_STEP(reg)); >> >> Nit: one per line would make this the tiniest bit easier to read > > ack > > Regards > Luca > >> >> Konrad >> >>> + >>> >>> reg = ocmem_read(ocmem, OCMEM_REG_HW_PROFILE); >>> ocmem->num_ports = OCMEM_HW_PROFILE_NUM_PORTS(reg); >>> ocmem->num_macros = OCMEM_HW_PROFILE_NUM_MACROS(reg); >>> >>> --- >>> base-commit: 8705151771af822ac794b44504cd72eebc423499 >>> change-id: 20230509-ocmem-hwver-99bcb33b028b >>> >>> Best regards, > > > >
diff --git a/drivers/soc/qcom/ocmem.c b/drivers/soc/qcom/ocmem.c index c3e78411c637..9f7c3348cbb9 100644 --- a/drivers/soc/qcom/ocmem.c +++ b/drivers/soc/qcom/ocmem.c @@ -76,6 +76,10 @@ struct ocmem { #define OCMEM_REG_GFX_MPU_START 0x00001004 #define OCMEM_REG_GFX_MPU_END 0x00001008 +#define OCMEM_HW_VERSION_MAJOR(val) FIELD_GET(GENMASK(31, 28), val) +#define OCMEM_HW_VERSION_MINOR(val) FIELD_GET(GENMASK(27, 16), val) +#define OCMEM_HW_VERSION_STEP(val) FIELD_GET(GENMASK(15, 0), val) + #define OCMEM_HW_PROFILE_NUM_PORTS(val) FIELD_GET(0x0000000f, (val)) #define OCMEM_HW_PROFILE_NUM_MACROS(val) FIELD_GET(0x00003f00, (val)) @@ -355,6 +359,11 @@ static int ocmem_dev_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) } } + reg = ocmem_read(ocmem, OCMEM_REG_HW_VERSION); + dev_dbg(dev, "OCMEM hardware version: %ld.%ld.%ld\n", + OCMEM_HW_VERSION_MAJOR(reg), OCMEM_HW_VERSION_MINOR(reg), + OCMEM_HW_VERSION_STEP(reg)); + reg = ocmem_read(ocmem, OCMEM_REG_HW_PROFILE); ocmem->num_ports = OCMEM_HW_PROFILE_NUM_PORTS(reg); ocmem->num_macros = OCMEM_HW_PROFILE_NUM_MACROS(reg);
It might be useful to know what hardware version of the OCMEM block the SoC contains. Add a debug print for that. Signed-off-by: Luca Weiss <luca@z3ntu.xyz> --- This patch is depends on [0] but could also be applied in the other order, if conflicts are resolved. [0] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-arm-msm/20230506-msm8226-ocmem-v1-1-3e24e2724f01@z3ntu.xyz/ --- Changes in v2: - Use FIELD_GET macros for getting correct bits from register (take wording from mdp5: major, minor, step which hopefully is sort of accurate) - Link to v1: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230509-ocmem-hwver-v1-1-b83ece3f2168@z3ntu.xyz --- drivers/soc/qcom/ocmem.c | 9 +++++++++ 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+) --- base-commit: 8705151771af822ac794b44504cd72eebc423499 change-id: 20230509-ocmem-hwver-99bcb33b028b Best regards,