| Message ID | 20230710105419.1228966-2-quic_kathirav@quicinc.com (mailing list archive) |
|---|---|
| State | Superseded |
| Headers | show |
| Series | Drop the IPQ5019 SoC ID | expand |
On 10/07/2023 12:54, Kathiravan T wrote: > IPQ5019 SoC is not available in production. Lets drop it. > > Signed-off-by: Kathiravan T <quic_kathirav@quicinc.com> > --- > include/dt-bindings/arm/qcom,ids.h | 1 - > 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/include/dt-bindings/arm/qcom,ids.h b/include/dt-bindings/arm/qcom,ids.h > index bcbe9ee2cdaf..179dd56b2d95 100644 > --- a/include/dt-bindings/arm/qcom,ids.h > +++ b/include/dt-bindings/arm/qcom,ids.h > @@ -250,7 +250,6 @@ > #define QCOM_ID_QRU1000 539 > #define QCOM_ID_QDU1000 545 > #define QCOM_ID_QDU1010 587 > -#define QCOM_ID_IPQ5019 569 What about users of this binding? What's the impact on them? When did the SoC become obsolete and unsupported by Qualcomm? Remember that ceasing a production does not mean that magically all users of a product disappear... Best regards, Krzysztof
On 10.07.2023 13:37, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: > On 10/07/2023 12:54, Kathiravan T wrote: >> IPQ5019 SoC is not available in production. Lets drop it. >> >> Signed-off-by: Kathiravan T <quic_kathirav@quicinc.com> >> --- >> include/dt-bindings/arm/qcom,ids.h | 1 - >> 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) >> >> diff --git a/include/dt-bindings/arm/qcom,ids.h b/include/dt-bindings/arm/qcom,ids.h >> index bcbe9ee2cdaf..179dd56b2d95 100644 >> --- a/include/dt-bindings/arm/qcom,ids.h >> +++ b/include/dt-bindings/arm/qcom,ids.h >> @@ -250,7 +250,6 @@ >> #define QCOM_ID_QRU1000 539 >> #define QCOM_ID_QDU1000 545 >> #define QCOM_ID_QDU1010 587 >> -#define QCOM_ID_IPQ5019 569 > > What about users of this binding? What's the impact on them? When did > the SoC become obsolete and unsupported by Qualcomm? Remember that > ceasing a production does not mean that magically all users of a product > disappear... This + from my experience, SOCID entries are set in stone and freed indices are never reclaimed Konrad > > > Best regards, > Krzysztof >
On 7/10/2023 5:40 PM, Konrad Dybcio wrote: > On 10.07.2023 13:37, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: >> On 10/07/2023 12:54, Kathiravan T wrote: >>> IPQ5019 SoC is not available in production. Lets drop it. >>> >>> Signed-off-by: Kathiravan T <quic_kathirav@quicinc.com> >>> --- >>> include/dt-bindings/arm/qcom,ids.h | 1 - >>> 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) >>> >>> diff --git a/include/dt-bindings/arm/qcom,ids.h b/include/dt-bindings/arm/qcom,ids.h >>> index bcbe9ee2cdaf..179dd56b2d95 100644 >>> --- a/include/dt-bindings/arm/qcom,ids.h >>> +++ b/include/dt-bindings/arm/qcom,ids.h >>> @@ -250,7 +250,6 @@ >>> #define QCOM_ID_QRU1000 539 >>> #define QCOM_ID_QDU1000 545 >>> #define QCOM_ID_QDU1010 587 >>> -#define QCOM_ID_IPQ5019 569 >> What about users of this binding? What's the impact on them? When did >> the SoC become obsolete and unsupported by Qualcomm? Remember that >> ceasing a production does not mean that magically all users of a product >> disappear... > This + from my experience, SOCID entries are set in stone and freed > indices are never reclaimed This SKU is planned but never productized. That's why I removed it. May be I should be more precise in the commit title. Should I leave it as it is / remove it? Thanks, Kathiravan T. > > Konrad >> >> Best regards, >> Krzysztof >>
On 11/07/2023 13:02, Kathiravan T wrote: > > On 7/10/2023 5:40 PM, Konrad Dybcio wrote: >> On 10.07.2023 13:37, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: >>> On 10/07/2023 12:54, Kathiravan T wrote: >>>> IPQ5019 SoC is not available in production. Lets drop it. >>>> >>>> Signed-off-by: Kathiravan T <quic_kathirav@quicinc.com> >>>> --- >>>> include/dt-bindings/arm/qcom,ids.h | 1 - >>>> 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) >>>> >>>> diff --git a/include/dt-bindings/arm/qcom,ids.h b/include/dt-bindings/arm/qcom,ids.h >>>> index bcbe9ee2cdaf..179dd56b2d95 100644 >>>> --- a/include/dt-bindings/arm/qcom,ids.h >>>> +++ b/include/dt-bindings/arm/qcom,ids.h >>>> @@ -250,7 +250,6 @@ >>>> #define QCOM_ID_QRU1000 539 >>>> #define QCOM_ID_QDU1000 545 >>>> #define QCOM_ID_QDU1010 587 >>>> -#define QCOM_ID_IPQ5019 569 >>> What about users of this binding? What's the impact on them? When did >>> the SoC become obsolete and unsupported by Qualcomm? Remember that >>> ceasing a production does not mean that magically all users of a product >>> disappear... >> This + from my experience, SOCID entries are set in stone and freed >> indices are never reclaimed > > > This SKU is planned but never productized. That's why I removed it. If you mean this was never produced, then yes, it can be removed and your commit msg should be a bit more precise about it. Best regards, Krzysztof
diff --git a/include/dt-bindings/arm/qcom,ids.h b/include/dt-bindings/arm/qcom,ids.h index bcbe9ee2cdaf..179dd56b2d95 100644 --- a/include/dt-bindings/arm/qcom,ids.h +++ b/include/dt-bindings/arm/qcom,ids.h @@ -250,7 +250,6 @@ #define QCOM_ID_QRU1000 539 #define QCOM_ID_QDU1000 545 #define QCOM_ID_QDU1010 587 -#define QCOM_ID_IPQ5019 569 #define QCOM_ID_QRU1032 588 #define QCOM_ID_QRU1052 589 #define QCOM_ID_QRU1062 590
IPQ5019 SoC is not available in production. Lets drop it. Signed-off-by: Kathiravan T <quic_kathirav@quicinc.com> --- include/dt-bindings/arm/qcom,ids.h | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)