Message ID | 20241121113006.28520-5-quic_rlaggysh@quicinc.com (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
State | New |
Headers | show |
Series | Add EPSS L3 provider support on SA8775P SoC | expand |
On 21/11/2024 12:30, Raviteja Laggyshetty wrote: > The EPSS instance in SA8775P uses PERF_STATE register instead of > REG_L3_VOTE to scale L3 clocks. > Along with SoC specific compatible, add new generic compatible > "qcom,epss-l3-perf" for PERF_STATE register based L3 scaling. > > Signed-off-by: Raviteja Laggyshetty <quic_rlaggysh@quicinc.com> > --- > drivers/interconnect/qcom/osm-l3.c | 2 ++ > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/drivers/interconnect/qcom/osm-l3.c b/drivers/interconnect/qcom/osm-l3.c > index a9405b7d251b..285afaa1f61e 100644 > --- a/drivers/interconnect/qcom/osm-l3.c > +++ b/drivers/interconnect/qcom/osm-l3.c > @@ -318,6 +318,7 @@ static int qcom_osm_l3_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) > > static const struct of_device_id osm_l3_of_match[] = { > { .compatible = "qcom,epss-l3", .data = &epss_l3_l3_vote }, > + { .compatible = "qcom,epss-l3-perf", .data = &epss_l3_perf_state }, Hm? Why? > { .compatible = "qcom,osm-l3", .data = &osm_l3 }, > { .compatible = "qcom,sc7180-osm-l3", .data = &osm_l3 }, > { .compatible = "qcom,sc7280-epss-l3", .data = &epss_l3_perf_state }, > @@ -325,6 +326,7 @@ static const struct of_device_id osm_l3_of_match[] = { > { .compatible = "qcom,sm8150-osm-l3", .data = &osm_l3 }, > { .compatible = "qcom,sc8180x-osm-l3", .data = &osm_l3 }, > { .compatible = "qcom,sm8250-epss-l3", .data = &epss_l3_perf_state }, > + { .compatible = "qcom,sa8775p-epss-l3", .data = &epss_l3_perf_state }, So this is compatible with sm8250. Use that one. Don't grow this table needlessly. Best regards, Krzysztof
diff --git a/drivers/interconnect/qcom/osm-l3.c b/drivers/interconnect/qcom/osm-l3.c index a9405b7d251b..285afaa1f61e 100644 --- a/drivers/interconnect/qcom/osm-l3.c +++ b/drivers/interconnect/qcom/osm-l3.c @@ -318,6 +318,7 @@ static int qcom_osm_l3_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) static const struct of_device_id osm_l3_of_match[] = { { .compatible = "qcom,epss-l3", .data = &epss_l3_l3_vote }, + { .compatible = "qcom,epss-l3-perf", .data = &epss_l3_perf_state }, { .compatible = "qcom,osm-l3", .data = &osm_l3 }, { .compatible = "qcom,sc7180-osm-l3", .data = &osm_l3 }, { .compatible = "qcom,sc7280-epss-l3", .data = &epss_l3_perf_state }, @@ -325,6 +326,7 @@ static const struct of_device_id osm_l3_of_match[] = { { .compatible = "qcom,sm8150-osm-l3", .data = &osm_l3 }, { .compatible = "qcom,sc8180x-osm-l3", .data = &osm_l3 }, { .compatible = "qcom,sm8250-epss-l3", .data = &epss_l3_perf_state }, + { .compatible = "qcom,sa8775p-epss-l3", .data = &epss_l3_perf_state }, { } }; MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, osm_l3_of_match);
The EPSS instance in SA8775P uses PERF_STATE register instead of REG_L3_VOTE to scale L3 clocks. Along with SoC specific compatible, add new generic compatible "qcom,epss-l3-perf" for PERF_STATE register based L3 scaling. Signed-off-by: Raviteja Laggyshetty <quic_rlaggysh@quicinc.com> --- drivers/interconnect/qcom/osm-l3.c | 2 ++ 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)