Message ID | 20250126-msm8226-modem-v2-9-e88d76d6daff@lucaweiss.eu (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
State | Superseded |
Headers | show |
Series | Modem support for MSM8226 | expand |
On Sun, Jan 26, 2025 at 09:57:28PM +0100, Luca Weiss wrote: > From: Matti Lehtimäki <matti.lehtimaki@gmail.com> > > Enable modem remoteproc on samsung,matisse-wifi & matisselte. > > Signed-off-by: Matti Lehtimäki <matti.lehtimaki@gmail.com> > Signed-off-by: Luca Weiss <luca@lucaweiss.eu> > --- > arch/arm/boot/dts/qcom/qcom-msm8226-samsung-matisse-common.dtsi | 7 +++++++ > 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/qcom/qcom-msm8226-samsung-matisse-common.dtsi b/arch/arm/boot/dts/qcom/qcom-msm8226-samsung-matisse-common.dtsi > index fbd568c7d6b7415d240aa1a2329d07cf9135274c..4155bfb2136022f2a85d69451c34f06ed2a700ac 100644 > --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/qcom/qcom-msm8226-samsung-matisse-common.dtsi > +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/qcom/qcom-msm8226-samsung-matisse-common.dtsi > @@ -225,6 +225,13 @@ &blsp1_uart3 { > status = "okay"; > }; > > +&modem { > + mx-supply = <&pm8226_l3>; > + pll-supply = <&pm8226_l8>; Hmmmmm, so I was looking at msm8926.dtsi downstream and it seems to override the msm8226.dtsi modem/mss definition [1]: 1. ext-bhs-reg is dropped 2. vdd_mss-supply is added This common include seems to cover both apq8026 (matissewifi) and msm8926 (matisselte). Do we need to handle this difference? First time I see such a difference between variants of a single SoC. Looking at all the overrides in msm8926.dtsi, it seems like they made quite some rework for the "LTE variant". Thanks, Stephan [1]: https://github.com/GalaxyTab4/android_kernel_samsung_matissewifi/blob/45f97bab323176fead18c8ddc20dc57d979904a3/arch/arm/boot/dts/msm8226/msm8926.dtsi#L32-L40
On maandag 27 januari 2025 10:44:19 Midden-Europese standaardtijd Stephan Gerhold wrote: > On Sun, Jan 26, 2025 at 09:57:28PM +0100, Luca Weiss wrote: > > From: Matti Lehtimäki <matti.lehtimaki@gmail.com> > > > > Enable modem remoteproc on samsung,matisse-wifi & matisselte. > > > > Signed-off-by: Matti Lehtimäki <matti.lehtimaki@gmail.com> > > Signed-off-by: Luca Weiss <luca@lucaweiss.eu> > > --- > > arch/arm/boot/dts/qcom/qcom-msm8226-samsung-matisse-common.dtsi | 7 +++++ ++ > > 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+) > > > > diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/qcom/qcom-msm8226-samsung-matisse- common.dtsi b/arch/arm/boot/dts/qcom/qcom-msm8226-samsung-matisse-common.dtsi > > index fbd568c7d6b7415d240aa1a2329d07cf9135274c.. 4155bfb2136022f2a85d69451c34f06ed2a700ac 100644 > > --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/qcom/qcom-msm8226-samsung-matisse-common.dtsi > > +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/qcom/qcom-msm8226-samsung-matisse-common.dtsi > > @@ -225,6 +225,13 @@ &blsp1_uart3 { > > status = "okay"; > > }; > > > > +&modem { > > + mx-supply = <&pm8226_l3>; > > + pll-supply = <&pm8226_l8>; > > Hmmmmm, so I was looking at msm8926.dtsi downstream and it seems to > override the msm8226.dtsi modem/mss definition [1]: > > 1. ext-bhs-reg is dropped > 2. vdd_mss-supply is added That's the same what I found, and have working with more (currently hacky) patches on msm8926-htc-memul. I decided against introducing it with this series since these patches have been pending for too long and initially when I was doing 8926, I wasn't sure how to make this into a proper patch. Now my idea is to introduce a "static const struct rproc_hexagon_res msm8926_mss" with the compatible qcom,msm8926-mss-pil which has these two differences. I think that's a better idea than adding some extra conditionals around to make the mss-supply optional and ext-bhs somehow optional in the driver based on dt. > > This common include seems to cover both apq8026 (matissewifi) and > msm8926 (matisselte). That's a very good point. I didn't think much about the matisse patches since they were introduced by Matti but yes... Either I add the msm8926 support in the same series already, or we just enable modem for matissewifi for now. I think I'll opt for the latter since the series is already 9 patches long and I don't want to make it too complicated. > > Do we need to handle this difference? > > First time I see such a difference between variants of a single SoC. > Looking at all the overrides in msm8926.dtsi, it seems like they made > quite some rework for the "LTE variant". Yeah, no clue what they did here. But also I think Qualcomm stopped making a thousand different variants of the same SoC (*cough* msm8974), nowadays they "only" make different variants which get different letters and numbers (sc7280=qcm6490=sm7325 etc). > > Thanks, > Stephan > > [1]: https://github.com/GalaxyTab4/android_kernel_samsung_matissewifi/blob/ 45f97bab323176fead18c8ddc20dc57d979904a3/arch/arm/boot/dts/msm8226/ msm8926.dtsi#L32-L40 >
On Mon, Jan 27, 2025 at 02:34:08PM +0100, Luca Weiss wrote: > On maandag 27 januari 2025 10:44:19 Midden-Europese standaardtijd Stephan > Gerhold wrote: > > On Sun, Jan 26, 2025 at 09:57:28PM +0100, Luca Weiss wrote: > > > From: Matti Lehtimäki <matti.lehtimaki@gmail.com> > > > > > > Enable modem remoteproc on samsung,matisse-wifi & matisselte. > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Matti Lehtimäki <matti.lehtimaki@gmail.com> > > > Signed-off-by: Luca Weiss <luca@lucaweiss.eu> > > > --- > > > arch/arm/boot/dts/qcom/qcom-msm8226-samsung-matisse-common.dtsi | 7 +++++ > ++ > > > 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+) > > > > > > diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/qcom/qcom-msm8226-samsung-matisse- > common.dtsi b/arch/arm/boot/dts/qcom/qcom-msm8226-samsung-matisse-common.dtsi > > > index fbd568c7d6b7415d240aa1a2329d07cf9135274c.. > 4155bfb2136022f2a85d69451c34f06ed2a700ac 100644 > > > --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/qcom/qcom-msm8226-samsung-matisse-common.dtsi > > > +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/qcom/qcom-msm8226-samsung-matisse-common.dtsi > > > @@ -225,6 +225,13 @@ &blsp1_uart3 { > > > status = "okay"; > > > }; > > > > > > +&modem { > > > + mx-supply = <&pm8226_l3>; > > > + pll-supply = <&pm8226_l8>; > > > > Hmmmmm, so I was looking at msm8926.dtsi downstream and it seems to > > override the msm8226.dtsi modem/mss definition [1]: > > > > 1. ext-bhs-reg is dropped > > 2. vdd_mss-supply is added > > That's the same what I found, and have working with more (currently hacky) > patches on msm8926-htc-memul. I decided against introducing it with this > series since these patches have been pending for too long and initially when I > was doing 8926, I wasn't sure how to make this into a proper patch. Now my > idea is to introduce a "static const struct rproc_hexagon_res msm8926_mss" > with the compatible qcom,msm8926-mss-pil which has these two differences. > I think that's a better idea than adding some extra conditionals around to > make the mss-supply optional and ext-bhs somehow optional in the driver based > on dt. > Yeah, that sounds good. Could add a new qcom-msm8926.dtsi include that overrides the compatible and /delete-property/ the ext-bhs-reg. Then just #include that only for matisselte and add the mss-supply there. > > > > This common include seems to cover both apq8026 (matissewifi) and > > msm8926 (matisselte). > > That's a very good point. I didn't think much about the matisse patches since > they were introduced by Matti but yes... Either I add the msm8926 support in > the same series already, or we just enable modem for matissewifi for now. I > think I'll opt for the latter since the series is already 9 patches long and I > don't want to make it too complicated. > Either way is fine for me. I guess I'd personally throw it in one series, just because it fits well together and it can take quite some time to get patches applied. :-) Thanks, Stephan
On 27.01.2025 2:34 PM, Luca Weiss wrote: > On maandag 27 januari 2025 10:44:19 Midden-Europese standaardtijd Stephan > Gerhold wrote: >> On Sun, Jan 26, 2025 at 09:57:28PM +0100, Luca Weiss wrote: >>> From: Matti Lehtimäki <matti.lehtimaki@gmail.com> >>> >>> Enable modem remoteproc on samsung,matisse-wifi & matisselte. >>> >>> Signed-off-by: Matti Lehtimäki <matti.lehtimaki@gmail.com> >>> Signed-off-by: Luca Weiss <luca@lucaweiss.eu> >>> --- >>> arch/arm/boot/dts/qcom/qcom-msm8226-samsung-matisse-common.dtsi | 7 +++++ > ++ >>> 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+) >>> >>> diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/qcom/qcom-msm8226-samsung-matisse- > common.dtsi b/arch/arm/boot/dts/qcom/qcom-msm8226-samsung-matisse-common.dtsi >>> index fbd568c7d6b7415d240aa1a2329d07cf9135274c.. > 4155bfb2136022f2a85d69451c34f06ed2a700ac 100644 >>> --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/qcom/qcom-msm8226-samsung-matisse-common.dtsi >>> +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/qcom/qcom-msm8226-samsung-matisse-common.dtsi >>> @@ -225,6 +225,13 @@ &blsp1_uart3 { >>> status = "okay"; >>> }; >>> >>> +&modem { >>> + mx-supply = <&pm8226_l3>; >>> + pll-supply = <&pm8226_l8>; >> >> Hmmmmm, so I was looking at msm8926.dtsi downstream and it seems to >> override the msm8226.dtsi modem/mss definition [1]: >> >> 1. ext-bhs-reg is dropped >> 2. vdd_mss-supply is added > > That's the same what I found, and have working with more (currently hacky) > patches on msm8926-htc-memul. I decided against introducing it with this > series since these patches have been pending for too long and initially when I > was doing 8926, I wasn't sure how to make this into a proper patch. Now my > idea is to introduce a "static const struct rproc_hexagon_res msm8926_mss" > with the compatible qcom,msm8926-mss-pil which has these two differences. > I think that's a better idea than adding some extra conditionals around to > make the mss-supply optional and ext-bhs somehow optional in the driver based > on dt. Sounds good. It would then live in msm8926.dtsi which already exists Konrad
diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/qcom/qcom-msm8226-samsung-matisse-common.dtsi b/arch/arm/boot/dts/qcom/qcom-msm8226-samsung-matisse-common.dtsi index fbd568c7d6b7415d240aa1a2329d07cf9135274c..4155bfb2136022f2a85d69451c34f06ed2a700ac 100644 --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/qcom/qcom-msm8226-samsung-matisse-common.dtsi +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/qcom/qcom-msm8226-samsung-matisse-common.dtsi @@ -225,6 +225,13 @@ &blsp1_uart3 { status = "okay"; }; +&modem { + mx-supply = <&pm8226_l3>; + pll-supply = <&pm8226_l8>; + + status = "okay"; +}; + &rpm_requests { regulators { compatible = "qcom,rpm-pm8226-regulators";