diff mbox series

[v2] Bluetooth: btusb: Add support for variant WCN6855 by using different nvm

Message ID 81add00a4a038008e9f734c5f5e5b712@codeaurora.org (mailing list archive)
State Superseded
Headers show
Series [v2] Bluetooth: btusb: Add support for variant WCN6855 by using different nvm | expand

Commit Message

tjiang@codeaurora.org Oct. 12, 2021, 7:55 a.m. UTC
the RF performance of wcn6855 soc chip from different foundries will be
difference, so we should use different nvm to configure them.

Signed-off-by: Tim Jiang <tjiang@codeaurora.org>
---
  drivers/bluetooth/btusb.c | 56 
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------
  1 file changed, 42 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)

  	__le32	patch_version;
@@ -3221,6 +3224,7 @@ static const struct qca_device_info 
qca_devices_table[] = {
  	{ 0x00000302, 28, 4, 16 }, /* Rome 3.2 */
  	{ 0x00130100, 40, 4, 16 }, /* WCN6855 1.0 */
  	{ 0x00130200, 40, 4, 16 }, /* WCN6855 2.0 */
+	{ 0x00130201, 40, 4, 16 }, /* WCN6855 2.1 */
  };

  static int btusb_qca_send_vendor_req(struct usb_device *udev, u8 
request,
@@ -3375,6 +3379,43 @@ static int btusb_setup_qca_load_rampatch(struct 
hci_dev *hdev,
  	return err;
  }

+static void btusb_generate_qca_nvm_name(char *fwname,
+					size_t max_size,
+					struct qca_version *ver)
+{
+	u32 rom_version = le32_to_cpu(ver->rom_version);
+	u16 flag = le16_to_cpu(ver->flag);
+
+	if (((flag >> 8) & 0xff) == QCA_FLAG_MULTI_NVM) {
+		u16 board_id = le16_to_cpu(ver->board_id);
+		u32 ram_version = le32_to_cpu(ver->ram_version);
+		const char *variant;
+
+		switch (ram_version) {
+		case WCN6855_2_0_RAM_VERSION_GF:
+		case WCN6855_2_1_RAM_VERSION_GF:
+			variant = "_gf";
+			break;
+		default:
+			variant = "";
+			break;
+		}
+
+		/* if boardid equal 0, use default nvm without suffix */
+		if (board_id == 0x0) {
+			snprintf(fwname, max_size, "qca/nvm_usb_%08x%s.bin",
+				rom_version, variant);
+		} else {
+			snprintf(fwname, max_size, "qca/nvm_usb_%08x%s_%04x.bin",
+				rom_version, variant, board_id);
+		}
+	} else {
+		snprintf(fwname, max_size, "qca/nvm_usb_%08x.bin",
+			rom_version);
+	}
+
+}
+
  static int btusb_setup_qca_load_nvm(struct hci_dev *hdev,
  				    struct qca_version *ver,
  				    const struct qca_device_info *info)
@@ -3383,20 +3424,7 @@ static int btusb_setup_qca_load_nvm(struct 
hci_dev *hdev,
  	char fwname[64];
  	int err;

-	if (((ver->flag >> 8) & 0xff) == QCA_FLAG_MULTI_NVM) {
-		/* if boardid equal 0, use default nvm without surfix */
-		if (le16_to_cpu(ver->board_id) == 0x0) {
-			snprintf(fwname, sizeof(fwname), "qca/nvm_usb_%08x.bin",
-				 le32_to_cpu(ver->rom_version));
-		} else {
-			snprintf(fwname, sizeof(fwname), "qca/nvm_usb_%08x_%04x.bin",
-				le32_to_cpu(ver->rom_version),
-				le16_to_cpu(ver->board_id));
-		}
-	} else {
-		snprintf(fwname, sizeof(fwname), "qca/nvm_usb_%08x.bin",
-			 le32_to_cpu(ver->rom_version));
-	}
+	btusb_generate_qca_nvm_name(fwname, sizeof(fwname), ver);

  	err = request_firmware(&fw, fwname, &hdev->dev);
  	if (err) {

Comments

tjiang@codeaurora.org Oct. 18, 2021, 7:49 a.m. UTC | #1
marcel:
   sorry to disturb you , could you help review this patch ? thank you.

regards.
tim


On 2021-10-12 15:55, tjiang@codeaurora.org wrote:
> the RF performance of wcn6855 soc chip from different foundries will be
> difference, so we should use different nvm to configure them.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Tim Jiang <tjiang@codeaurora.org>
> ---
>  drivers/bluetooth/btusb.c | 56 
> +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------
>  1 file changed, 42 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/bluetooth/btusb.c b/drivers/bluetooth/btusb.c
> index 75c83768c257..f352ff351b61 100644
> --- a/drivers/bluetooth/btusb.c
> +++ b/drivers/bluetooth/btusb.c
> @@ -3190,6 +3190,9 @@ static int btusb_set_bdaddr_wcn6855(struct 
> hci_dev *hdev,
>  #define QCA_DFU_TIMEOUT		3000
>  #define QCA_FLAG_MULTI_NVM      0x80
> 
> +#define WCN6855_2_0_RAM_VERSION_GF 0x400c1200
> +#define WCN6855_2_1_RAM_VERSION_GF 0x400c1211
> +
>  struct qca_version {
>  	__le32	rom_version;
>  	__le32	patch_version;
> @@ -3221,6 +3224,7 @@ static const struct qca_device_info
> qca_devices_table[] = {
>  	{ 0x00000302, 28, 4, 16 }, /* Rome 3.2 */
>  	{ 0x00130100, 40, 4, 16 }, /* WCN6855 1.0 */
>  	{ 0x00130200, 40, 4, 16 }, /* WCN6855 2.0 */
> +	{ 0x00130201, 40, 4, 16 }, /* WCN6855 2.1 */
>  };
> 
>  static int btusb_qca_send_vendor_req(struct usb_device *udev, u8 
> request,
> @@ -3375,6 +3379,43 @@ static int btusb_setup_qca_load_rampatch(struct
> hci_dev *hdev,
>  	return err;
>  }
> 
> +static void btusb_generate_qca_nvm_name(char *fwname,
> +					size_t max_size,
> +					struct qca_version *ver)
> +{
> +	u32 rom_version = le32_to_cpu(ver->rom_version);
> +	u16 flag = le16_to_cpu(ver->flag);
> +
> +	if (((flag >> 8) & 0xff) == QCA_FLAG_MULTI_NVM) {
> +		u16 board_id = le16_to_cpu(ver->board_id);
> +		u32 ram_version = le32_to_cpu(ver->ram_version);
> +		const char *variant;
> +
> +		switch (ram_version) {
> +		case WCN6855_2_0_RAM_VERSION_GF:
> +		case WCN6855_2_1_RAM_VERSION_GF:
> +			variant = "_gf";
> +			break;
> +		default:
> +			variant = "";
> +			break;
> +		}
> +
> +		/* if boardid equal 0, use default nvm without suffix */
> +		if (board_id == 0x0) {
> +			snprintf(fwname, max_size, "qca/nvm_usb_%08x%s.bin",
> +				rom_version, variant);
> +		} else {
> +			snprintf(fwname, max_size, "qca/nvm_usb_%08x%s_%04x.bin",
> +				rom_version, variant, board_id);
> +		}
> +	} else {
> +		snprintf(fwname, max_size, "qca/nvm_usb_%08x.bin",
> +			rom_version);
> +	}
> +
> +}
> +
>  static int btusb_setup_qca_load_nvm(struct hci_dev *hdev,
>  				    struct qca_version *ver,
>  				    const struct qca_device_info *info)
> @@ -3383,20 +3424,7 @@ static int btusb_setup_qca_load_nvm(struct 
> hci_dev *hdev,
>  	char fwname[64];
>  	int err;
> 
> -	if (((ver->flag >> 8) & 0xff) == QCA_FLAG_MULTI_NVM) {
> -		/* if boardid equal 0, use default nvm without surfix */
> -		if (le16_to_cpu(ver->board_id) == 0x0) {
> -			snprintf(fwname, sizeof(fwname), "qca/nvm_usb_%08x.bin",
> -				 le32_to_cpu(ver->rom_version));
> -		} else {
> -			snprintf(fwname, sizeof(fwname), "qca/nvm_usb_%08x_%04x.bin",
> -				le32_to_cpu(ver->rom_version),
> -				le16_to_cpu(ver->board_id));
> -		}
> -	} else {
> -		snprintf(fwname, sizeof(fwname), "qca/nvm_usb_%08x.bin",
> -			 le32_to_cpu(ver->rom_version));
> -	}
> +	btusb_generate_qca_nvm_name(fwname, sizeof(fwname), ver);
> 
>  	err = request_firmware(&fw, fwname, &hdev->dev);
>  	if (err) {
Matthias Kaehlcke Oct. 19, 2021, 7:29 p.m. UTC | #2
On Tue, Oct 12, 2021 at 03:55:56PM +0800, tjiang@codeaurora.org wrote:
> the RF performance of wcn6855 soc chip from different foundries will be
> difference, so we should use different nvm to configure them.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Tim Jiang <tjiang@codeaurora.org>
> ---
>  drivers/bluetooth/btusb.c | 56
> +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------
>  1 file changed, 42 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/bluetooth/btusb.c b/drivers/bluetooth/btusb.c
> index 75c83768c257..f352ff351b61 100644
> --- a/drivers/bluetooth/btusb.c
> +++ b/drivers/bluetooth/btusb.c
> @@ -3190,6 +3190,9 @@ static int btusb_set_bdaddr_wcn6855(struct hci_dev
> *hdev,
>  #define QCA_DFU_TIMEOUT		3000
>  #define QCA_FLAG_MULTI_NVM      0x80
> 
> +#define WCN6855_2_0_RAM_VERSION_GF 0x400c1200
> +#define WCN6855_2_1_RAM_VERSION_GF 0x400c1211
> +
>  struct qca_version {
>  	__le32	rom_version;
>  	__le32	patch_version;
> @@ -3221,6 +3224,7 @@ static const struct qca_device_info
> qca_devices_table[] = {
>  	{ 0x00000302, 28, 4, 16 }, /* Rome 3.2 */
>  	{ 0x00130100, 40, 4, 16 }, /* WCN6855 1.0 */
>  	{ 0x00130200, 40, 4, 16 }, /* WCN6855 2.0 */
> +	{ 0x00130201, 40, 4, 16 }, /* WCN6855 2.1 */
>  };
> 
>  static int btusb_qca_send_vendor_req(struct usb_device *udev, u8 request,
> @@ -3375,6 +3379,43 @@ static int btusb_setup_qca_load_rampatch(struct
> hci_dev *hdev,
>  	return err;
>  }
> 
> +static void btusb_generate_qca_nvm_name(char *fwname,
> +					size_t max_size,
> +					struct qca_version *ver)

=> const struct qca_version *ver

> +{
> +	u32 rom_version = le32_to_cpu(ver->rom_version);
> +	u16 flag = le16_to_cpu(ver->flag);
> +
> +	if (((flag >> 8) & 0xff) == QCA_FLAG_MULTI_NVM) {
> +		u16 board_id = le16_to_cpu(ver->board_id);
> +		u32 ram_version = le32_to_cpu(ver->ram_version);
> +		const char *variant;
> +
> +		switch (ram_version) {
> +		case WCN6855_2_0_RAM_VERSION_GF:
> +		case WCN6855_2_1_RAM_VERSION_GF:
> +			variant = "_gf";
> +			break;
> +		default:
> +			variant = "";

instead of the default branch you could assign a default to 'variant' at
declaration time, but it's fine either way.

> +			break;
> +		}
> +
> +		/* if boardid equal 0, use default nvm without suffix */

delete the comment, it just states the obvious

> +		if (board_id == 0x0) {

nit: is there really any value in using a hex number here instead of a
plain decimal 0?

> +			snprintf(fwname, max_size, "qca/nvm_usb_%08x%s.bin",
> +				rom_version, variant);
> +		} else {
> +			snprintf(fwname, max_size, "qca/nvm_usb_%08x%s_%04x.bin",
> +				rom_version, variant, board_id);
> +		}
> +	} else {
> +		snprintf(fwname, max_size, "qca/nvm_usb_%08x.bin",
> +			rom_version);
> +	}
> +
> +}
> +
>  static int btusb_setup_qca_load_nvm(struct hci_dev *hdev,
>  				    struct qca_version *ver,
>  				    const struct qca_device_info *info)
> @@ -3383,20 +3424,7 @@ static int btusb_setup_qca_load_nvm(struct hci_dev
> *hdev,
>  	char fwname[64];
>  	int err;
> 
> -	if (((ver->flag >> 8) & 0xff) == QCA_FLAG_MULTI_NVM) {
> -		/* if boardid equal 0, use default nvm without surfix */
> -		if (le16_to_cpu(ver->board_id) == 0x0) {
> -			snprintf(fwname, sizeof(fwname), "qca/nvm_usb_%08x.bin",
> -				 le32_to_cpu(ver->rom_version));
> -		} else {
> -			snprintf(fwname, sizeof(fwname), "qca/nvm_usb_%08x_%04x.bin",
> -				le32_to_cpu(ver->rom_version),
> -				le16_to_cpu(ver->board_id));
> -		}
> -	} else {
> -		snprintf(fwname, sizeof(fwname), "qca/nvm_usb_%08x.bin",
> -			 le32_to_cpu(ver->rom_version));
> -	}
> +	btusb_generate_qca_nvm_name(fwname, sizeof(fwname), ver);
> 
>  	err = request_firmware(&fw, fwname, &hdev->dev);
>  	if (err) {
tjiang@codeaurora.org Oct. 20, 2021, 4 a.m. UTC | #3
Thanks Matthias for the comments. please see my comments inline .

BTW: marcel , do you agree with Matthias comments ? if fine , I will 
align Matthias comments and make the final version.

regards.
tim
On 2021-10-20 03:29, Matthias Kaehlcke wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 12, 2021 at 03:55:56PM +0800, tjiang@codeaurora.org wrote:
>> the RF performance of wcn6855 soc chip from different foundries will 
>> be
>> difference, so we should use different nvm to configure them.
>> 
>> Signed-off-by: Tim Jiang <tjiang@codeaurora.org>
>> ---
>>  drivers/bluetooth/btusb.c | 56
>> +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------
>>  1 file changed, 42 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
>> 
>> diff --git a/drivers/bluetooth/btusb.c b/drivers/bluetooth/btusb.c
>> index 75c83768c257..f352ff351b61 100644
>> --- a/drivers/bluetooth/btusb.c
>> +++ b/drivers/bluetooth/btusb.c
>> @@ -3190,6 +3190,9 @@ static int btusb_set_bdaddr_wcn6855(struct 
>> hci_dev
>> *hdev,
>>  #define QCA_DFU_TIMEOUT		3000
>>  #define QCA_FLAG_MULTI_NVM      0x80
>> 
>> +#define WCN6855_2_0_RAM_VERSION_GF 0x400c1200
>> +#define WCN6855_2_1_RAM_VERSION_GF 0x400c1211
>> +
>>  struct qca_version {
>>  	__le32	rom_version;
>>  	__le32	patch_version;
>> @@ -3221,6 +3224,7 @@ static const struct qca_device_info
>> qca_devices_table[] = {
>>  	{ 0x00000302, 28, 4, 16 }, /* Rome 3.2 */
>>  	{ 0x00130100, 40, 4, 16 }, /* WCN6855 1.0 */
>>  	{ 0x00130200, 40, 4, 16 }, /* WCN6855 2.0 */
>> +	{ 0x00130201, 40, 4, 16 }, /* WCN6855 2.1 */
>>  };
>> 
>>  static int btusb_qca_send_vendor_req(struct usb_device *udev, u8 
>> request,
>> @@ -3375,6 +3379,43 @@ static int btusb_setup_qca_load_rampatch(struct
>> hci_dev *hdev,
>>  	return err;
>>  }
>> 
>> +static void btusb_generate_qca_nvm_name(char *fwname,
>> +					size_t max_size,
>> +					struct qca_version *ver)
> 
> => const struct qca_version *ver
> 
>> +{
>> +	u32 rom_version = le32_to_cpu(ver->rom_version);
>> +	u16 flag = le16_to_cpu(ver->flag);
>> +
>> +	if (((flag >> 8) & 0xff) == QCA_FLAG_MULTI_NVM) {
>> +		u16 board_id = le16_to_cpu(ver->board_id);
>> +		u32 ram_version = le32_to_cpu(ver->ram_version);
>> +		const char *variant;
>> +
>> +		switch (ram_version) {
>> +		case WCN6855_2_0_RAM_VERSION_GF:
>> +		case WCN6855_2_1_RAM_VERSION_GF:
>> +			variant = "_gf";
>> +			break;
>> +		default:
>> +			variant = "";
> 
> instead of the default branch you could assign a default to 'variant' 
> at
> declaration time, but it's fine either way.

[Tim] this code style is recommend by marcel.

> 
>> +			break;
>> +		}
>> +
>> +		/* if boardid equal 0, use default nvm without suffix */
> 
> delete the comment, it just states the obvious
> 
>> +		if (board_id == 0x0) {
> 
> nit: is there really any value in using a hex number here instead of a
> plain decimal 0?

[Tim] this line is inherit from last change , if you think I should 
change 0x0 to 0 , I am fine.

> 
>> +			snprintf(fwname, max_size, "qca/nvm_usb_%08x%s.bin",
>> +				rom_version, variant);
>> +		} else {
>> +			snprintf(fwname, max_size, "qca/nvm_usb_%08x%s_%04x.bin",
>> +				rom_version, variant, board_id);
>> +		}
>> +	} else {
>> +		snprintf(fwname, max_size, "qca/nvm_usb_%08x.bin",
>> +			rom_version);
>> +	}
>> +
>> +}
>> +
>>  static int btusb_setup_qca_load_nvm(struct hci_dev *hdev,
>>  				    struct qca_version *ver,
>>  				    const struct qca_device_info *info)
>> @@ -3383,20 +3424,7 @@ static int btusb_setup_qca_load_nvm(struct 
>> hci_dev
>> *hdev,
>>  	char fwname[64];
>>  	int err;
>> 
>> -	if (((ver->flag >> 8) & 0xff) == QCA_FLAG_MULTI_NVM) {
>> -		/* if boardid equal 0, use default nvm without surfix */
>> -		if (le16_to_cpu(ver->board_id) == 0x0) {
>> -			snprintf(fwname, sizeof(fwname), "qca/nvm_usb_%08x.bin",
>> -				 le32_to_cpu(ver->rom_version));
>> -		} else {
>> -			snprintf(fwname, sizeof(fwname), "qca/nvm_usb_%08x_%04x.bin",
>> -				le32_to_cpu(ver->rom_version),
>> -				le16_to_cpu(ver->board_id));
>> -		}
>> -	} else {
>> -		snprintf(fwname, sizeof(fwname), "qca/nvm_usb_%08x.bin",
>> -			 le32_to_cpu(ver->rom_version));
>> -	}
>> +	btusb_generate_qca_nvm_name(fwname, sizeof(fwname), ver);
>> 
>>  	err = request_firmware(&fw, fwname, &hdev->dev);
>>  	if (err) {
Matthias Kaehlcke Oct. 20, 2021, 3:30 p.m. UTC | #4
On Wed, Oct 20, 2021 at 12:00:52PM +0800, tjiang@codeaurora.org wrote:
> Thanks Matthias for the comments. please see my comments inline .
> 
> BTW: marcel , do you agree with Matthias comments ? if fine , I will align
> Matthias comments and make the final version.
> 
> regards.
> tim
> On 2021-10-20 03:29, Matthias Kaehlcke wrote:
> > On Tue, Oct 12, 2021 at 03:55:56PM +0800, tjiang@codeaurora.org wrote:
> > > the RF performance of wcn6855 soc chip from different foundries will
> > > be
> > > difference, so we should use different nvm to configure them.
> > > 
> > > Signed-off-by: Tim Jiang <tjiang@codeaurora.org>
> > > ---
> > >  drivers/bluetooth/btusb.c | 56
> > > +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------
> > >  1 file changed, 42 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
> > > 
> > > diff --git a/drivers/bluetooth/btusb.c b/drivers/bluetooth/btusb.c
> > > index 75c83768c257..f352ff351b61 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/bluetooth/btusb.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/bluetooth/btusb.c
> > > @@ -3190,6 +3190,9 @@ static int btusb_set_bdaddr_wcn6855(struct
> > > hci_dev
> > > *hdev,
> > >  #define QCA_DFU_TIMEOUT		3000
> > >  #define QCA_FLAG_MULTI_NVM      0x80
> > > 
> > > +#define WCN6855_2_0_RAM_VERSION_GF 0x400c1200
> > > +#define WCN6855_2_1_RAM_VERSION_GF 0x400c1211
> > > +
> > >  struct qca_version {
> > >  	__le32	rom_version;
> > >  	__le32	patch_version;
> > > @@ -3221,6 +3224,7 @@ static const struct qca_device_info
> > > qca_devices_table[] = {
> > >  	{ 0x00000302, 28, 4, 16 }, /* Rome 3.2 */
> > >  	{ 0x00130100, 40, 4, 16 }, /* WCN6855 1.0 */
> > >  	{ 0x00130200, 40, 4, 16 }, /* WCN6855 2.0 */
> > > +	{ 0x00130201, 40, 4, 16 }, /* WCN6855 2.1 */
> > >  };
> > > 
> > >  static int btusb_qca_send_vendor_req(struct usb_device *udev, u8
> > > request,
> > > @@ -3375,6 +3379,43 @@ static int btusb_setup_qca_load_rampatch(struct
> > > hci_dev *hdev,
> > >  	return err;
> > >  }
> > > 
> > > +static void btusb_generate_qca_nvm_name(char *fwname,
> > > +					size_t max_size,
> > > +					struct qca_version *ver)
> > 
> > => const struct qca_version *ver
> > 
> > > +{
> > > +	u32 rom_version = le32_to_cpu(ver->rom_version);
> > > +	u16 flag = le16_to_cpu(ver->flag);
> > > +
> > > +	if (((flag >> 8) & 0xff) == QCA_FLAG_MULTI_NVM) {
> > > +		u16 board_id = le16_to_cpu(ver->board_id);
> > > +		u32 ram_version = le32_to_cpu(ver->ram_version);
> > > +		const char *variant;
> > > +
> > > +		switch (ram_version) {
> > > +		case WCN6855_2_0_RAM_VERSION_GF:
> > > +		case WCN6855_2_1_RAM_VERSION_GF:
> > > +			variant = "_gf";
> > > +			break;
> > > +		default:
> > > +			variant = "";
> > 
> > instead of the default branch you could assign a default to 'variant' at
> > declaration time, but it's fine either way.
> 
> [Tim] this code style is recommend by marcel.

Both are ok, if Marcel prefers the default branch let's keep it that way.

> > 
> > > +			break;
> > > +		}
> > > +
> > > +		/* if boardid equal 0, use default nvm without suffix */
> > 
> > delete the comment, it just states the obvious
> > 
> > > +		if (board_id == 0x0) {
> > 
> > nit: is there really any value in using a hex number here instead of a
> > plain decimal 0?
> 
> [Tim] this line is inherit from last change , if you think I should change
> 0x0 to 0 , I am fine.

Since this patch touches/moves this code it seems a good opportunity to clean
things up a bit. It's also true that there are quite a few instances of this
and comparisons with '0x00' in other parts of the kernel, so I guess it's
also fine to leave it as is.
tjiang@codeaurora.org Oct. 21, 2021, 4:07 a.m. UTC | #5
thanks Matthias for the new comments.

marcel :
   do you agree with my comments which response to Matthias , if is OK, I 
will make the final version for the next patch, thank you for the help.

regards.
tim

On 2021-10-20 23:30, Matthias Kaehlcke wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 20, 2021 at 12:00:52PM +0800, tjiang@codeaurora.org wrote:
>> Thanks Matthias for the comments. please see my comments inline .
>> 
>> BTW: marcel , do you agree with Matthias comments ? if fine , I will 
>> align
>> Matthias comments and make the final version.
>> 
>> regards.
>> tim
>> On 2021-10-20 03:29, Matthias Kaehlcke wrote:
>> > On Tue, Oct 12, 2021 at 03:55:56PM +0800, tjiang@codeaurora.org wrote:
>> > > the RF performance of wcn6855 soc chip from different foundries will
>> > > be
>> > > difference, so we should use different nvm to configure them.
>> > >
>> > > Signed-off-by: Tim Jiang <tjiang@codeaurora.org>
>> > > ---
>> > >  drivers/bluetooth/btusb.c | 56
>> > > +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------
>> > >  1 file changed, 42 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
>> > >
>> > > diff --git a/drivers/bluetooth/btusb.c b/drivers/bluetooth/btusb.c
>> > > index 75c83768c257..f352ff351b61 100644
>> > > --- a/drivers/bluetooth/btusb.c
>> > > +++ b/drivers/bluetooth/btusb.c
>> > > @@ -3190,6 +3190,9 @@ static int btusb_set_bdaddr_wcn6855(struct
>> > > hci_dev
>> > > *hdev,
>> > >  #define QCA_DFU_TIMEOUT		3000
>> > >  #define QCA_FLAG_MULTI_NVM      0x80
>> > >
>> > > +#define WCN6855_2_0_RAM_VERSION_GF 0x400c1200
>> > > +#define WCN6855_2_1_RAM_VERSION_GF 0x400c1211
>> > > +
>> > >  struct qca_version {
>> > >  	__le32	rom_version;
>> > >  	__le32	patch_version;
>> > > @@ -3221,6 +3224,7 @@ static const struct qca_device_info
>> > > qca_devices_table[] = {
>> > >  	{ 0x00000302, 28, 4, 16 }, /* Rome 3.2 */
>> > >  	{ 0x00130100, 40, 4, 16 }, /* WCN6855 1.0 */
>> > >  	{ 0x00130200, 40, 4, 16 }, /* WCN6855 2.0 */
>> > > +	{ 0x00130201, 40, 4, 16 }, /* WCN6855 2.1 */
>> > >  };
>> > >
>> > >  static int btusb_qca_send_vendor_req(struct usb_device *udev, u8
>> > > request,
>> > > @@ -3375,6 +3379,43 @@ static int btusb_setup_qca_load_rampatch(struct
>> > > hci_dev *hdev,
>> > >  	return err;
>> > >  }
>> > >
>> > > +static void btusb_generate_qca_nvm_name(char *fwname,
>> > > +					size_t max_size,
>> > > +					struct qca_version *ver)
>> >
>> > => const struct qca_version *ver
[Tim] fine ,will modify it in next version.
>> >
>> > > +{
>> > > +	u32 rom_version = le32_to_cpu(ver->rom_version);
>> > > +	u16 flag = le16_to_cpu(ver->flag);
>> > > +
>> > > +	if (((flag >> 8) & 0xff) == QCA_FLAG_MULTI_NVM) {
>> > > +		u16 board_id = le16_to_cpu(ver->board_id);
>> > > +		u32 ram_version = le32_to_cpu(ver->ram_version);
>> > > +		const char *variant;
>> > > +
>> > > +		switch (ram_version) {
>> > > +		case WCN6855_2_0_RAM_VERSION_GF:
>> > > +		case WCN6855_2_1_RAM_VERSION_GF:
>> > > +			variant = "_gf";
>> > > +			break;
>> > > +		default:
>> > > +			variant = "";
>> >
>> > instead of the default branch you could assign a default to 'variant' at
>> > declaration time, but it's fine either way.
>> 
>> [Tim] this code style is recommend by marcel.
> 
> Both are ok, if Marcel prefers the default branch let's keep it that 
> way.
> 
>> >
>> > > +			break;
>> > > +		}
>> > > +
>> > > +		/* if boardid equal 0, use default nvm without suffix */
>> >
>> > delete the comment, it just states the obvious
[Tim] fine, will modify it in next version.
>> >
>> > > +		if (board_id == 0x0) {
>> >
>> > nit: is there really any value in using a hex number here instead of a
>> > plain decimal 0?
>> 
>> [Tim] this line is inherit from last change , if you think I should 
>> change
>> 0x0 to 0 , I am fine.
> 
> Since this patch touches/moves this code it seems a good opportunity to 
> clean
> things up a bit. It's also true that there are quite a few instances of 
> this
> and comparisons with '0x00' in other parts of the kernel, so I guess 
> it's
> also fine to leave it as is.
[Tim] I am OK to change from 0x0 to 0 in next version.
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/drivers/bluetooth/btusb.c b/drivers/bluetooth/btusb.c
index 75c83768c257..f352ff351b61 100644
--- a/drivers/bluetooth/btusb.c
+++ b/drivers/bluetooth/btusb.c
@@ -3190,6 +3190,9 @@  static int btusb_set_bdaddr_wcn6855(struct hci_dev 
*hdev,
  #define QCA_DFU_TIMEOUT		3000
  #define QCA_FLAG_MULTI_NVM      0x80

+#define WCN6855_2_0_RAM_VERSION_GF 0x400c1200
+#define WCN6855_2_1_RAM_VERSION_GF 0x400c1211
+
  struct qca_version {
  	__le32	rom_version;