Message ID | 20221003153420.285896-1-vschneid@redhat.com (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
Headers | show |
Series | bitmap,cpumask: Add for_each_cpu_andnot() | expand |
On Mon, Oct 03, 2022 at 04:34:15PM +0100, Valentin Schneider wrote: > As suggested by Yury, this is the bitmap/cpumask specific bits of [1]. This now > also contains an extra fix for blk_mq. Patches ##2-5 look good to me, but I'd like to give them some testing. Let's also wait for other comments, and if nothing wrong will be spotted, I'll take it. Thanks, Yury > This is based on top of Yury's bitmap-for-next [2]. > > A note on treewide use of for_each_cpu_andnot() > =============================================== > > I've used the below coccinelle script to find places that could be patched (I > couldn't figure out the valid syntax to patch from coccinelle itself): > > ,----- > @tmpandnot@ > expression tmpmask; > iterator for_each_cpu; > position p; > statement S; > @@ > cpumask_andnot(tmpmask, ...); > > ... > > ( > for_each_cpu@p(..., tmpmask, ...) > S > | > for_each_cpu@p(..., tmpmask, ...) > { > ... > } > ) > > @script:python depends on tmpandnot@ > p << tmpandnot.p; > @@ > coccilib.report.print_report(p[0], "andnot loop here") > '----- > > Which yields (against c40e8341e3b3): > > .//arch/powerpc/kernel/smp.c:1587:1-13: andnot loop here > .//arch/powerpc/kernel/smp.c:1530:1-13: andnot loop here > .//arch/powerpc/kernel/smp.c:1440:1-13: andnot loop here > .//arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/subcore.c:306:2-14: andnot loop here > .//arch/x86/kernel/apic/x2apic_cluster.c:62:1-13: andnot loop here > .//drivers/acpi/acpi_pad.c:110:1-13: andnot loop here > .//drivers/cpufreq/armada-8k-cpufreq.c:148:1-13: andnot loop here > .//drivers/cpufreq/powernv-cpufreq.c:931:1-13: andnot loop here > .//drivers/net/ethernet/sfc/efx_channels.c:73:1-13: andnot loop here > .//drivers/net/ethernet/sfc/siena/efx_channels.c:73:1-13: andnot loop here > .//kernel/sched/core.c:345:1-13: andnot loop here > .//kernel/sched/core.c:366:1-13: andnot loop here > .//net/core/dev.c:3058:1-13: andnot loop here > > A lot of those are actually of the shape > > for_each_cpu(cpu, mask) { > ... > cpumask_andnot(mask, ...); > } > > I think *some* of the powerpc ones would be a match for for_each_cpu_andnot(), > but I decided to just stick to the one obvious one in __sched_core_flip(). > > [1]: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20220923132527.1001870-1-vschneid@redhat.com/ > [2]: https://github.com/norov/linux.git/ -b bitmap-for-next > > Cheers, > Valentin > > Valentin Schneider (5): > blk_mq: Fix cpumask_check() warning in blk_mq_hctx_next_cpu() > lib/find_bit: Introduce find_next_andnot_bit() > cpumask: Introduce for_each_cpu_andnot() > lib/test_cpumask: Add for_each_cpu_and(not) tests > sched/core: Merge cpumask_andnot()+for_each_cpu() into > for_each_cpu_andnot() > > block/blk-mq.c | 9 +++++++-- > include/linux/cpumask.h | 18 ++++++++++++++++++ > include/linux/find.h | 38 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > kernel/sched/core.c | 5 +---- > lib/cpumask_kunit.c | 19 +++++++++++++++++++ > lib/find_bit.c | 9 +++++++++ > 6 files changed, 92 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) > > -- > 2.31.1
On Mon, Oct 03, 2022 at 11:54:20AM -0700, Yury Norov wrote: > On Mon, Oct 03, 2022 at 04:34:15PM +0100, Valentin Schneider wrote: > > As suggested by Yury, this is the bitmap/cpumask specific bits of [1]. This now > > also contains an extra fix for blk_mq. > > Patches ##2-5 look good to me, but I'd like to give them some testing. > Let's also wait for other comments, and if nothing wrong will be spotted, > I'll take it. OK, taking those in bitmap-for-next.