Message ID | 20221126025550.967914-1-damien.lemoal@opensource.wdc.com (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
Headers | show |
Series | Minor fixes | expand |
On Sat, 26 Nov 2022 11:55:48 +0900, Damien Le Moal wrote: > Jens, > > A couple of patches to: > (1) fix recent mq-deadline improvement. Feeel free to squash that one > into commit 015d02f48537 ("block: mq-deadline: Do not break > sequential write streams to zoned HDDs") in your for-6.2/block > branch. > (2) Fix REQ_SYNC use for async direct IOs to block device files. > > [...] Applied, thanks! [1/2] block: mq-deadline: Rename deadline_is_seq_writes() commit: 4b49197f9fbd2dd4e0452df6effaba665beecb45 [2/2] block: fops: Do not set REQ_SYNC for async IOs commit: 26a7bc153a19f3349fd8c2e262728b2eae6bfd6f Best regards,
On Mon, Nov 28, 2022 at 07:15:47AM -0700, Jens Axboe wrote: > [2/2] block: fops: Do not set REQ_SYNC for async IOs > commit: 26a7bc153a19f3349fd8c2e262728b2eae6bfd6f Urgg. I don't think this is right. And even if it was, block device I/O is not out of line with the other direct I/O implementations.
On 11/28/22 8:29 AM, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > On Mon, Nov 28, 2022 at 07:15:47AM -0700, Jens Axboe wrote: >> [2/2] block: fops: Do not set REQ_SYNC for async IOs >> commit: 26a7bc153a19f3349fd8c2e262728b2eae6bfd6f > > Urgg. I don't think this is right. And even if it was, block device > I/O is not out of line with the other direct I/O implementations. I'll drop it for now.