diff mbox

[v6,4/5] dax: for truncate/hole-punch, do zeroing through the driver if possible

Message ID 1462906156-22303-5-git-send-email-vishal.l.verma@intel.com (mailing list archive)
State New, archived
Headers show

Commit Message

Verma, Vishal L May 10, 2016, 6:49 p.m. UTC
In the truncate or hole-punch path in dax, we clear out sub-page ranges.
If these sub-page ranges are sector aligned and sized, we can do the
zeroing through the driver instead so that error-clearing is handled
automatically.

For sub-sector ranges, we still have to rely on clear_pmem and have the
possibility of tripping over errors.

Cc: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
Cc: Ross Zwisler <ross.zwisler@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Jeff Moyer <jmoyer@redhat.com>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
Cc: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
Cc: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Signed-off-by: Vishal Verma <vishal.l.verma@intel.com>
---
 Documentation/filesystems/dax.txt | 32 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 fs/dax.c                          | 29 ++++++++++++++++++++++++-----
 2 files changed, 56 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

Comments

Christoph Hellwig May 10, 2016, 7:25 p.m. UTC | #1
Hi Vishal,

can you also pick up the my patch to add a low-level __dax_zero_range
that I cced you on?  That way we can avoid a nasty merge conflict with
my xfs/iomap changes.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-block" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Verma, Vishal L May 10, 2016, 7:49 p.m. UTC | #2
On Tue, 2016-05-10 at 12:25 -0700, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> Hi Vishal,

> 

> can you also pick up the my patch to add a low-level __dax_zero_range

> that I cced you on?  That way we can avoid a nasty merge conflict with

> my xfs/iomap changes.


Good idea - I'll do that for the next posting. I'll wait a day or two
for any additional reviews/acks.

I'm looking to get all this into a branch in the nvdimm tree once Jan
splits up his dax-locking series..

Mostly I guess I'm looking for a yay or nay for the block layer changes
(patch 2). Jens?
Jan Kara May 11, 2016, 8:15 a.m. UTC | #3
On Tue 10-05-16 12:49:15, Vishal Verma wrote:
> In the truncate or hole-punch path in dax, we clear out sub-page ranges.
> If these sub-page ranges are sector aligned and sized, we can do the
> zeroing through the driver instead so that error-clearing is handled
> automatically.
> 
> For sub-sector ranges, we still have to rely on clear_pmem and have the
> possibility of tripping over errors.
> 
> Cc: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
> Cc: Ross Zwisler <ross.zwisler@linux.intel.com>
> Cc: Jeff Moyer <jmoyer@redhat.com>
> Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
> Cc: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
> Cc: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
> Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
> Signed-off-by: Vishal Verma <vishal.l.verma@intel.com>

...

> +static bool dax_range_is_aligned(struct block_device *bdev,
> +				 struct blk_dax_ctl *dax, unsigned int offset,
> +				 unsigned int length)
> +{
> +	unsigned short sector_size = bdev_logical_block_size(bdev);
> +
> +	if (!IS_ALIGNED(((u64)dax->addr + offset), sector_size))

One more question: 'dax' is initialized in dax_zero_page_range() and
dax->addr is going to be always NULL here. So either you forgot to call
dax_map_atomic() to get the addr or the use of dax->addr is just bogus
(which is what I currently believe since I see no way how the address could
be unaligned with the sector_size)...

								Honza
> +		return false;
> +	if (!IS_ALIGNED(length, sector_size))
> +		return false;
> +
> +	return true;
> +}
> +
>  /**
>   * dax_zero_page_range - zero a range within a page of a DAX file
>   * @inode: The file being truncated
> @@ -1240,11 +1254,16 @@ int dax_zero_page_range(struct inode *inode, loff_t from, unsigned length,
>  			.size = PAGE_SIZE,
>  		};
>  
> -		if (dax_map_atomic(bdev, &dax) < 0)
> -			return PTR_ERR(dax.addr);
> -		clear_pmem(dax.addr + offset, length);
> -		wmb_pmem();
> -		dax_unmap_atomic(bdev, &dax);
> +		if (dax_range_is_aligned(bdev, &dax, offset, length))
> +			return blkdev_issue_zeroout(bdev, dax.sector,
> +					length >> 9, GFP_NOFS, true);
> +		else {
> +			if (dax_map_atomic(bdev, &dax) < 0)
> +				return PTR_ERR(dax.addr);
> +			clear_pmem(dax.addr + offset, length);
> +			wmb_pmem();
> +			dax_unmap_atomic(bdev, &dax);
> +		}
>  	}
>  
>  	return 0;
> -- 
> 2.5.5
>
Verma, Vishal L May 11, 2016, 5:47 p.m. UTC | #4
On Wed, 2016-05-11 at 10:15 +0200, Jan Kara wrote:
> On Tue 10-05-16 12:49:15, Vishal Verma wrote:

> > 

> > In the truncate or hole-punch path in dax, we clear out sub-page

> > ranges.

> > If these sub-page ranges are sector aligned and sized, we can do the

> > zeroing through the driver instead so that error-clearing is handled

> > automatically.

> > 

> > For sub-sector ranges, we still have to rely on clear_pmem and have

> > the

> > possibility of tripping over errors.

> > 

> > Cc: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>

> > Cc: Ross Zwisler <ross.zwisler@linux.intel.com>

> > Cc: Jeff Moyer <jmoyer@redhat.com>

> > Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>

> > Cc: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>

> > Cc: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>

> > Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>

> > Signed-off-by: Vishal Verma <vishal.l.verma@intel.com>

> ...

> 

> > 

> > +static bool dax_range_is_aligned(struct block_device *bdev,

> > +				 struct blk_dax_ctl *dax, unsigned

> > int offset,

> > +				 unsigned int length)

> > +{

> > +	unsigned short sector_size = bdev_logical_block_size(bdev);

> > +

> > +	if (!IS_ALIGNED(((u64)dax->addr + offset), sector_size))

> One more question: 'dax' is initialized in dax_zero_page_range() and

> dax->addr is going to be always NULL here. So either you forgot to

> call

> dax_map_atomic() to get the addr or the use of dax->addr is just bogus

> (which is what I currently believe since I see no way how the address

> could

> be unaligned with the sector_size)...

> 


Good catch, and you're right. I don't think I actually even want to use
dax->addr for the alignment check here - I want to check if we're
aligned to the block device sector. I'm thinking something like:

	if (!IS_ALIGNED(offset, sector_size))

Technically we want to check if sector * sector_size + offset is
aligned, but the first part of that is already a sector :)
diff mbox

Patch

diff --git a/Documentation/filesystems/dax.txt b/Documentation/filesystems/dax.txt
index 7bde640..ce4587d 100644
--- a/Documentation/filesystems/dax.txt
+++ b/Documentation/filesystems/dax.txt
@@ -79,6 +79,38 @@  These filesystems may be used for inspiration:
 - ext4: the fourth extended filesystem, see Documentation/filesystems/ext4.txt
 
 
+Handling Media Errors
+---------------------
+
+The libnvdimm subsystem stores a record of known media error locations for
+each pmem block device (in gendisk->badblocks). If we fault at such location,
+or one with a latent error not yet discovered, the application can expect
+to receive a SIGBUS. Libnvdimm also allows clearing of these errors by simply
+writing the affected sectors (through the pmem driver, and if the underlying
+NVDIMM supports the clear_poison DSM defined by ACPI).
+
+Since DAX IO normally doesn't go through the driver/bio path, applications or
+sysadmins have an option to restore the lost data from a prior backup/inbuilt
+redundancy in the following ways:
+
+1. Delete the affected file, and restore from a backup (sysadmin route):
+   This will free the file system blocks that were being used by the file,
+   and the next time they're allocated, they will be zeroed first, which
+   happens through the driver, and will clear bad sectors.
+
+2. Truncate or hole-punch the part of the file that has a bad-block (at least
+   an entire aligned sector has to be hole-punched, but not necessarily an
+   entire filesystem block).
+
+These are the two basic paths that allow DAX filesystems to continue operating
+in the presence of media errors. More robust error recovery mechanisms can be
+built on top of this in the future, for example, involving redundancy/mirroring
+provided at the block layer through DM, or additionally, at the filesystem
+level. These would have to rely on the above two tenets, that error clearing
+can happen either by sending an IO through the driver, or zeroing (also through
+the driver).
+
+
 Shortcomings
 ------------
 
diff --git a/fs/dax.c b/fs/dax.c
index 5948d9b..0167cde 100644
--- a/fs/dax.c
+++ b/fs/dax.c
@@ -1196,6 +1196,20 @@  out:
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(dax_pfn_mkwrite);
 
+static bool dax_range_is_aligned(struct block_device *bdev,
+				 struct blk_dax_ctl *dax, unsigned int offset,
+				 unsigned int length)
+{
+	unsigned short sector_size = bdev_logical_block_size(bdev);
+
+	if (!IS_ALIGNED(((u64)dax->addr + offset), sector_size))
+		return false;
+	if (!IS_ALIGNED(length, sector_size))
+		return false;
+
+	return true;
+}
+
 /**
  * dax_zero_page_range - zero a range within a page of a DAX file
  * @inode: The file being truncated
@@ -1240,11 +1254,16 @@  int dax_zero_page_range(struct inode *inode, loff_t from, unsigned length,
 			.size = PAGE_SIZE,
 		};
 
-		if (dax_map_atomic(bdev, &dax) < 0)
-			return PTR_ERR(dax.addr);
-		clear_pmem(dax.addr + offset, length);
-		wmb_pmem();
-		dax_unmap_atomic(bdev, &dax);
+		if (dax_range_is_aligned(bdev, &dax, offset, length))
+			return blkdev_issue_zeroout(bdev, dax.sector,
+					length >> 9, GFP_NOFS, true);
+		else {
+			if (dax_map_atomic(bdev, &dax) < 0)
+				return PTR_ERR(dax.addr);
+			clear_pmem(dax.addr + offset, length);
+			wmb_pmem();
+			dax_unmap_atomic(bdev, &dax);
+		}
 	}
 
 	return 0;