@@ -48,7 +48,7 @@ static void rrpc_page_invalidate(struct rrpc *rrpc, struct rrpc_addr *a)
}
static void rrpc_invalidate_range(struct rrpc *rrpc, sector_t slba,
- unsigned len)
+ unsigned int len)
{
sector_t i;
@@ -188,7 +188,7 @@ static inline int request_intersects(struct rrpc_inflight_rq *r,
}
static int __rrpc_lock_laddr(struct rrpc *rrpc, sector_t laddr,
- unsigned pages, struct rrpc_inflight_rq *r)
+ unsigned int pages, struct rrpc_inflight_rq *r)
{
sector_t laddr_end = laddr + pages - 1;
struct rrpc_inflight_rq *rtmp;
@@ -213,7 +213,7 @@ static int __rrpc_lock_laddr(struct rrpc *rrpc, sector_t laddr,
}
static inline int rrpc_lock_laddr(struct rrpc *rrpc, sector_t laddr,
- unsigned pages,
+ unsigned int pages,
struct rrpc_inflight_rq *r)
{
BUG_ON((laddr + pages) > rrpc->nr_sects);
Checkpatch found two incidents where the type was preferred to be written out in full. ./drivers/lightnvm/rrpc.h:184: WARNING: Prefer 'unsigned int' to bare use of 'unsigned' ./drivers/lightnvm/rrpc.h:209: WARNING: Prefer 'unsigned int' to bare use of 'unsigned' ./drivers/lightnvm/rrpc.c:51: WARNING: Prefer 'unsigned int' to bare use of 'unsigned' Signed-off-by: Matias Bjørling <m@bjorling.me> --- drivers/lightnvm/rrpc.c | 2 +- drivers/lightnvm/rrpc.h | 4 ++-- 2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)