From patchwork Sat Feb 19 10:58:29 2022 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Byungchul Park X-Patchwork-Id: 12752266 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F1BCCC433EF for ; Sat, 19 Feb 2022 11:00:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S242052AbiBSLAU (ORCPT ); Sat, 19 Feb 2022 06:00:20 -0500 Received: from mxb-00190b01.gslb.pphosted.com ([23.128.96.19]:42554 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S242184AbiBSK7O (ORCPT ); Sat, 19 Feb 2022 05:59:14 -0500 Received: from lgeamrelo11.lge.com (lgeamrelo13.lge.com [156.147.23.53]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 772506A022 for ; Sat, 19 Feb 2022 02:58:45 -0800 (PST) Received: from unknown (HELO lgemrelse7q.lge.com) (156.147.1.151) by 156.147.23.53 with ESMTP; 19 Feb 2022 19:58:45 +0900 X-Original-SENDERIP: 156.147.1.151 X-Original-MAILFROM: byungchul.park@lge.com Received: from unknown (HELO localhost.localdomain) (10.177.244.38) by 156.147.1.151 with ESMTP; 19 Feb 2022 19:58:45 +0900 X-Original-SENDERIP: 10.177.244.38 X-Original-MAILFROM: byungchul.park@lge.com From: Byungchul Park To: torvalds@linux-foundation.org Cc: damien.lemoal@opensource.wdc.com, linux-ide@vger.kernel.org, adilger.kernel@dilger.ca, linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org, mingo@redhat.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, peterz@infradead.org, will@kernel.org, tglx@linutronix.de, rostedt@goodmis.org, joel@joelfernandes.org, sashal@kernel.org, daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch, chris@chris-wilson.co.uk, duyuyang@gmail.com, johannes.berg@intel.com, tj@kernel.org, tytso@mit.edu, willy@infradead.org, david@fromorbit.com, amir73il@gmail.com, bfields@fieldses.org, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, kernel-team@lge.com, linux-mm@kvack.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org, mhocko@kernel.org, minchan@kernel.org, hannes@cmpxchg.org, vdavydov.dev@gmail.com, sj@kernel.org, jglisse@redhat.com, dennis@kernel.org, cl@linux.com, penberg@kernel.org, rientjes@google.com, vbabka@suse.cz, ngupta@vflare.org, linux-block@vger.kernel.org, axboe@kernel.dk, paolo.valente@linaro.org, josef@toxicpanda.com, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk, jack@suse.cz, jack@suse.com, jlayton@kernel.org, dan.j.williams@intel.com, hch@infradead.org, djwong@kernel.org, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, airlied@linux.ie, rodrigosiqueiramelo@gmail.com, melissa.srw@gmail.com, hamohammed.sa@gmail.com Subject: [PATCH v2 16/18] locking/lockdep, cpu/hotplus: Use a weaker annotation in AP thread Date: Sat, 19 Feb 2022 19:58:29 +0900 Message-Id: <1645268311-24222-17-git-send-email-byungchul.park@lge.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 1.9.1 In-Reply-To: <1645268311-24222-1-git-send-email-byungchul.park@lge.com> References: <1645268311-24222-1-git-send-email-byungchul.park@lge.com> Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-block@vger.kernel.org cb92173d1f0 (locking/lockdep, cpu/hotplug: Annotate AP thread) was introduced to make lockdep_assert_cpus_held() work in AP thread. However, the annotation is too strong for that purpose. We don't have to use more than try lock annotation for that. Furthermore, now that Dept was introduced, false positive alarms was reported by that. Replaced it with try lock annotation. Signed-off-by: Byungchul Park --- kernel/cpu.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/kernel/cpu.c b/kernel/cpu.c index 407a256..1f92a42 100644 --- a/kernel/cpu.c +++ b/kernel/cpu.c @@ -355,7 +355,7 @@ int lockdep_is_cpus_held(void) static void lockdep_acquire_cpus_lock(void) { - rwsem_acquire(&cpu_hotplug_lock.dep_map, 0, 0, _THIS_IP_); + rwsem_acquire(&cpu_hotplug_lock.dep_map, 0, 1, _THIS_IP_); } static void lockdep_release_cpus_lock(void)