Message ID | 20190224141952.GA3653@bharath12345-Inspiron-5559 (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
State | New, archived |
Headers | show |
Series | badblocks: Prefer unsigned int over unsigned | expand |
On 2/24/19 7:19 AM, Bharath Vedartham wrote:
> Replace unsigned with unsigned int to improve readability.
Frivolous change, would make a lot more sense to get checkpatch
to stop complaining about this.
On Sun, Feb 24, 2019 at 08:15:30AM -0700, Jens Axboe wrote: > On 2/24/19 7:19 AM, Bharath Vedartham wrote: > > Replace unsigned with unsigned int to improve readability. > > Frivolous change, would make a lot more sense to get checkpatch > to stop complaining about this. > > -- > Jens Axboe > I understand. I am starting out kernel hacking. I have been working on fixing checkpatch.pl warnings. If you have any tasks for me in the kernel, it would be great. I have also noticed a lot of warnings to replace printk with subsystem specific warning functions. Is that a valuable change? Bharath
On Sun, Feb 24, 2019 at 4:38 PM Bharath Vedartham <linux.bhar@gmail.com> wrote: > I understand. I am starting out kernel hacking. I have been working on > fixing checkpatch.pl warnings. If you have any tasks for me in the > kernel, it would be great. > > I have also noticed a lot of warnings to replace printk with subsystem > specific warning functions. Is that a valuable change? This is a very good start: https://lists.kernelnewbies.org/pipermail/kernelnewbies/2017-April/017765.html Happy hacking and welcome! :-)
On Sun, Feb 24, 2019 at 04:50:51PM +0100, Richard Weinberger wrote: > On Sun, Feb 24, 2019 at 4:38 PM Bharath Vedartham <linux.bhar@gmail.com> wrote: > > I understand. I am starting out kernel hacking. I have been working on > > fixing checkpatch.pl warnings. If you have any tasks for me in the > > kernel, it would be great. > > > > I have also noticed a lot of warnings to replace printk with subsystem > > specific warning functions. Is that a valuable change? > > This is a very good start: > https://lists.kernelnewbies.org/pipermail/kernelnewbies/2017-April/017765.html > > Happy hacking and welcome! :-) > > -- > Thanks, > //richard Hey! Thanks for the link Richard! I have read it and clearly understood the message. I will work on understanding the kernel and writing my own code for my own personal learning before jumping into tasks! Thanks for your time! Bharath
diff --git a/block/badblocks.c b/block/badblocks.c index 91f7bcf..e3f90c9 100644 --- a/block/badblocks.c +++ b/block/badblocks.c @@ -66,7 +66,7 @@ int badblocks_check(struct badblocks *bb, sector_t s, int sectors, u64 *p = bb->page; int rv; sector_t target = s + sectors; - unsigned seq; + unsigned int seq; if (bb->shift > 0) { /* round the start down, and the end up */
Replace unsigned with unsigned int to improve readability. Signed-off-by: Bharath Vedartham <linux.bhar@gmail.com> --- block/badblocks.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)