diff mbox series

[RFC,V2,01/13] block: add helper of blk_queue_poll

Message ID 20210318164827.1481133-2-ming.lei@redhat.com (mailing list archive)
State New, archived
Headers show
Series block: support bio based io polling | expand

Commit Message

Ming Lei March 18, 2021, 4:48 p.m. UTC
There has been 3 users, and will be more, so add one such helper.

Signed-off-by: Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>
---
 block/blk-core.c         | 2 +-
 block/blk-mq.c           | 3 +--
 drivers/nvme/host/core.c | 2 +-
 include/linux/blkdev.h   | 1 +
 4 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

Comments

Mike Snitzer March 19, 2021, 4:52 p.m. UTC | #1
On Thu, Mar 18 2021 at 12:48pm -0400,
Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com> wrote:

> There has been 3 users, and will be more, so add one such helper.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>

Not sure if you're collecting Reviewed-by or Acked-by at this point?
Seems you dropped Chaitanya's Reviewed-by to v1:
https://listman.redhat.com/archives/dm-devel/2021-March/msg00166.html

Do you plan to iterate a lot more before you put out a non-RFC?  For
this RFC v2, I'll withhold adding any of my Reviewed-by tags and just
reply where I see things that might need folding into the next
iteration.

Mike
Ming Lei March 23, 2021, 11:17 a.m. UTC | #2
On Fri, Mar 19, 2021 at 12:52:42PM -0400, Mike Snitzer wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 18 2021 at 12:48pm -0400,
> Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com> wrote:
> 
> > There has been 3 users, and will be more, so add one such helper.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>
> 
> Not sure if you're collecting Reviewed-by or Acked-by at this point?
> Seems you dropped Chaitanya's Reviewed-by to v1:
> https://listman.redhat.com/archives/dm-devel/2021-March/msg00166.html

Sorry, that should be an accident.

> 
> Do you plan to iterate a lot more before you put out a non-RFC?  For
> this RFC v2, I'll withhold adding any of my Reviewed-by tags and just
> reply where I see things that might need folding into the next
> iteration.

If no one objects the basic approach taken in V2, I will remove RFC in
V3.
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/block/blk-core.c b/block/blk-core.c
index fc60ff208497..a31371d55b9d 100644
--- a/block/blk-core.c
+++ b/block/blk-core.c
@@ -836,7 +836,7 @@  static noinline_for_stack bool submit_bio_checks(struct bio *bio)
 		}
 	}
 
-	if (!test_bit(QUEUE_FLAG_POLL, &q->queue_flags))
+	if (!blk_queue_poll(q))
 		bio->bi_opf &= ~REQ_HIPRI;
 
 	switch (bio_op(bio)) {
diff --git a/block/blk-mq.c b/block/blk-mq.c
index d4d7c1caa439..63c81df3b8b5 100644
--- a/block/blk-mq.c
+++ b/block/blk-mq.c
@@ -3869,8 +3869,7 @@  int blk_poll(struct request_queue *q, blk_qc_t cookie, bool spin)
 	struct blk_mq_hw_ctx *hctx;
 	long state;
 
-	if (!blk_qc_t_valid(cookie) ||
-	    !test_bit(QUEUE_FLAG_POLL, &q->queue_flags))
+	if (!blk_qc_t_valid(cookie) || !blk_queue_poll(q))
 		return 0;
 
 	if (current->plug)
diff --git a/drivers/nvme/host/core.c b/drivers/nvme/host/core.c
index a5653892d773..1bf94f0d2e8d 100644
--- a/drivers/nvme/host/core.c
+++ b/drivers/nvme/host/core.c
@@ -956,7 +956,7 @@  static void nvme_execute_rq_polled(struct request_queue *q,
 {
 	DECLARE_COMPLETION_ONSTACK(wait);
 
-	WARN_ON_ONCE(!test_bit(QUEUE_FLAG_POLL, &q->queue_flags));
+	WARN_ON_ONCE(!blk_queue_poll(q));
 
 	rq->cmd_flags |= REQ_HIPRI;
 	rq->end_io_data = &wait;
diff --git a/include/linux/blkdev.h b/include/linux/blkdev.h
index bc6bc8383b43..89a01850cf12 100644
--- a/include/linux/blkdev.h
+++ b/include/linux/blkdev.h
@@ -665,6 +665,7 @@  bool blk_queue_flag_test_and_set(unsigned int flag, struct request_queue *q);
 #define blk_queue_fua(q)	test_bit(QUEUE_FLAG_FUA, &(q)->queue_flags)
 #define blk_queue_registered(q)	test_bit(QUEUE_FLAG_REGISTERED, &(q)->queue_flags)
 #define blk_queue_nowait(q)	test_bit(QUEUE_FLAG_NOWAIT, &(q)->queue_flags)
+#define blk_queue_poll(q)	test_bit(QUEUE_FLAG_POLL, &(q)->queue_flags)
 
 extern void blk_set_pm_only(struct request_queue *q);
 extern void blk_clear_pm_only(struct request_queue *q);