| Message ID | 20220928234008.30302-1-mgurtovoy@nvidia.com (mailing list archive) |
|---|---|
| State | New, archived |
| Headers | show |
| Series | [1/1] virtio_pci: use common helper to configure SR-IOV | expand |
Looks good,
Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com>
On Thu, Sep 29, 2022 at 7:40 AM Max Gurtovoy <mgurtovoy@nvidia.com> wrote: > > This is instead of re-writing the same logic in virtio driver. > > Signed-off-by: Max Gurtovoy <mgurtovoy@nvidia.com> Acked-by: Jason Wang <Jasowang@redhat.com> > --- > drivers/virtio/virtio_pci_common.c | 15 +-------------- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 14 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/virtio/virtio_pci_common.c b/drivers/virtio/virtio_pci_common.c > index ad258a9d3b9f..67d3970e57f2 100644 > --- a/drivers/virtio/virtio_pci_common.c > +++ b/drivers/virtio/virtio_pci_common.c > @@ -607,7 +607,6 @@ static int virtio_pci_sriov_configure(struct pci_dev *pci_dev, int num_vfs) > { > struct virtio_pci_device *vp_dev = pci_get_drvdata(pci_dev); > struct virtio_device *vdev = &vp_dev->vdev; > - int ret; > > if (!(vdev->config->get_status(vdev) & VIRTIO_CONFIG_S_DRIVER_OK)) > return -EBUSY; > @@ -615,19 +614,7 @@ static int virtio_pci_sriov_configure(struct pci_dev *pci_dev, int num_vfs) > if (!__virtio_test_bit(vdev, VIRTIO_F_SR_IOV)) > return -EINVAL; > > - if (pci_vfs_assigned(pci_dev)) > - return -EPERM; > - > - if (num_vfs == 0) { > - pci_disable_sriov(pci_dev); > - return 0; > - } > - > - ret = pci_enable_sriov(pci_dev, num_vfs); > - if (ret < 0) > - return ret; > - > - return num_vfs; > + return pci_sriov_configure_simple(pci_dev, num_vfs); > } > > static struct pci_driver virtio_pci_driver = { > -- > 2.18.1 >
On Thu, Sep 29, 2022 at 02:40:08AM +0300, Max Gurtovoy wrote: > This is instead of re-writing the same logic in virtio driver. > > Signed-off-by: Max Gurtovoy <mgurtovoy@nvidia.com> Dropped this as it caused build failures: https://lore.kernel.org/r/202210080424.gSmuYfb0-lkp%40intel.com > --- > drivers/virtio/virtio_pci_common.c | 15 +-------------- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 14 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/virtio/virtio_pci_common.c b/drivers/virtio/virtio_pci_common.c > index ad258a9d3b9f..67d3970e57f2 100644 > --- a/drivers/virtio/virtio_pci_common.c > +++ b/drivers/virtio/virtio_pci_common.c > @@ -607,7 +607,6 @@ static int virtio_pci_sriov_configure(struct pci_dev *pci_dev, int num_vfs) > { > struct virtio_pci_device *vp_dev = pci_get_drvdata(pci_dev); > struct virtio_device *vdev = &vp_dev->vdev; > - int ret; > > if (!(vdev->config->get_status(vdev) & VIRTIO_CONFIG_S_DRIVER_OK)) > return -EBUSY; > @@ -615,19 +614,7 @@ static int virtio_pci_sriov_configure(struct pci_dev *pci_dev, int num_vfs) > if (!__virtio_test_bit(vdev, VIRTIO_F_SR_IOV)) > return -EINVAL; > > - if (pci_vfs_assigned(pci_dev)) > - return -EPERM; > - > - if (num_vfs == 0) { > - pci_disable_sriov(pci_dev); > - return 0; > - } > - > - ret = pci_enable_sriov(pci_dev, num_vfs); > - if (ret < 0) > - return ret; > - > - return num_vfs; > + return pci_sriov_configure_simple(pci_dev, num_vfs); > } > > static struct pci_driver virtio_pci_driver = { > -- > 2.18.1
On 10/12/2022 8:02 AM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > On Thu, Sep 29, 2022 at 02:40:08AM +0300, Max Gurtovoy wrote: >> This is instead of re-writing the same logic in virtio driver. >> >> Signed-off-by: Max Gurtovoy <mgurtovoy@nvidia.com> > Dropped this as it caused build failures: > > https://lore.kernel.org/r/202210080424.gSmuYfb0-lkp%40intel.com maybe you can re-run it with: diff --git a/drivers/virtio/Makefile b/drivers/virtio/Makefile index 8e98d24917cc..b383326a20e2 100644 --- a/drivers/virtio/Makefile +++ b/drivers/virtio/Makefile @@ -5,10 +5,11 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_VIRTIO_PCI_LIB) += virtio_pci_modern_dev.o obj-$(CONFIG_VIRTIO_PCI_LIB_LEGACY) += virtio_pci_legacy_dev.o obj-$(CONFIG_VIRTIO_MMIO) += virtio_mmio.o obj-$(CONFIG_VIRTIO_PCI) += virtio_pci.o -virtio_pci-y := virtio_pci_modern.o virtio_pci_common.o -virtio_pci-$(CONFIG_VIRTIO_PCI_LEGACY) += virtio_pci_legacy.o obj-$(CONFIG_VIRTIO_BALLOON) += virtio_balloon.o obj-$(CONFIG_VIRTIO_INPUT) += virtio_input.o obj-$(CONFIG_VIRTIO_VDPA) += virtio_vdpa.o obj-$(CONFIG_VIRTIO_MEM) += virtio_mem.o obj-$(CONFIG_VIRTIO_DMA_SHARED_BUFFER) += virtio_dma_buf.o + +virtio_pci-$(CONFIG_VIRTIO_PCI) := virtio_pci_modern.o virtio_pci_common.o +virtio_pci-$(CONFIG_VIRTIO_PCI_LEGACY) += virtio_pci_legacy.o > >> --- >> drivers/virtio/virtio_pci_common.c | 15 +-------------- >> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 14 deletions(-) >> >> diff --git a/drivers/virtio/virtio_pci_common.c b/drivers/virtio/virtio_pci_common.c >> index ad258a9d3b9f..67d3970e57f2 100644 >> --- a/drivers/virtio/virtio_pci_common.c >> +++ b/drivers/virtio/virtio_pci_common.c >> @@ -607,7 +607,6 @@ static int virtio_pci_sriov_configure(struct pci_dev *pci_dev, int num_vfs) >> { >> struct virtio_pci_device *vp_dev = pci_get_drvdata(pci_dev); >> struct virtio_device *vdev = &vp_dev->vdev; >> - int ret; >> >> if (!(vdev->config->get_status(vdev) & VIRTIO_CONFIG_S_DRIVER_OK)) >> return -EBUSY; >> @@ -615,19 +614,7 @@ static int virtio_pci_sriov_configure(struct pci_dev *pci_dev, int num_vfs) >> if (!__virtio_test_bit(vdev, VIRTIO_F_SR_IOV)) >> return -EINVAL; >> >> - if (pci_vfs_assigned(pci_dev)) >> - return -EPERM; >> - >> - if (num_vfs == 0) { >> - pci_disable_sriov(pci_dev); >> - return 0; >> - } >> - >> - ret = pci_enable_sriov(pci_dev, num_vfs); >> - if (ret < 0) >> - return ret; >> - >> - return num_vfs; >> + return pci_sriov_configure_simple(pci_dev, num_vfs); >> } >> >> static struct pci_driver virtio_pci_driver = { >> -- >> 2.18.1
On 10/12/2022 11:42 AM, Max Gurtovoy wrote: > > On 10/12/2022 8:02 AM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: >> On Thu, Sep 29, 2022 at 02:40:08AM +0300, Max Gurtovoy wrote: >>> This is instead of re-writing the same logic in virtio driver. >>> >>> Signed-off-by: Max Gurtovoy <mgurtovoy@nvidia.com> >> Dropped this as it caused build failures: >> >> https://lore.kernel.org/r/202210080424.gSmuYfb0-lkp%40intel.com > > maybe you can re-run it with: > > diff --git a/drivers/virtio/Makefile b/drivers/virtio/Makefile > index 8e98d24917cc..b383326a20e2 100644 > --- a/drivers/virtio/Makefile > +++ b/drivers/virtio/Makefile > @@ -5,10 +5,11 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_VIRTIO_PCI_LIB) += virtio_pci_modern_dev.o > obj-$(CONFIG_VIRTIO_PCI_LIB_LEGACY) += virtio_pci_legacy_dev.o > obj-$(CONFIG_VIRTIO_MMIO) += virtio_mmio.o > obj-$(CONFIG_VIRTIO_PCI) += virtio_pci.o > -virtio_pci-y := virtio_pci_modern.o virtio_pci_common.o > -virtio_pci-$(CONFIG_VIRTIO_PCI_LEGACY) += virtio_pci_legacy.o > obj-$(CONFIG_VIRTIO_BALLOON) += virtio_balloon.o > obj-$(CONFIG_VIRTIO_INPUT) += virtio_input.o > obj-$(CONFIG_VIRTIO_VDPA) += virtio_vdpa.o > obj-$(CONFIG_VIRTIO_MEM) += virtio_mem.o > obj-$(CONFIG_VIRTIO_DMA_SHARED_BUFFER) += virtio_dma_buf.o > + > +virtio_pci-$(CONFIG_VIRTIO_PCI) := virtio_pci_modern.o > virtio_pci_common.o > +virtio_pci-$(CONFIG_VIRTIO_PCI_LEGACY) += virtio_pci_legacy.o > Now I saw that CONFIG_PCI_IOV is not set in the error log so the bellow should fix it: diff --git a/include/linux/pci.h b/include/linux/pci.h index 060af91bafcd..c519220e8ff8 100644 --- a/include/linux/pci.h +++ b/include/linux/pci.h @@ -2228,7 +2228,10 @@ static inline int pci_sriov_set_totalvfs(struct pci_dev *dev, u16 numvfs) { return 0; } static inline int pci_sriov_get_totalvfs(struct pci_dev *dev) { return 0; } -#define pci_sriov_configure_simple NULL +static inline int pci_sriov_configure_simple(struct pci_dev *dev, int nr_virtfn) +{ + return -ENOSYS; +} static inline resource_size_t pci_iov_resource_size(struct pci_dev *dev, int resno) { return 0; } static inline void pci_vf_drivers_autoprobe(struct pci_dev *dev, bool probe) { } Bjorn, WDYT about the above ? should I send it to the pci subsystem list ? > >> >>> --- >>> drivers/virtio/virtio_pci_common.c | 15 +-------------- >>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 14 deletions(-) >>> >>> diff --git a/drivers/virtio/virtio_pci_common.c >>> b/drivers/virtio/virtio_pci_common.c >>> index ad258a9d3b9f..67d3970e57f2 100644 >>> --- a/drivers/virtio/virtio_pci_common.c >>> +++ b/drivers/virtio/virtio_pci_common.c >>> @@ -607,7 +607,6 @@ static int virtio_pci_sriov_configure(struct >>> pci_dev *pci_dev, int num_vfs) >>> { >>> struct virtio_pci_device *vp_dev = pci_get_drvdata(pci_dev); >>> struct virtio_device *vdev = &vp_dev->vdev; >>> - int ret; >>> if (!(vdev->config->get_status(vdev) & >>> VIRTIO_CONFIG_S_DRIVER_OK)) >>> return -EBUSY; >>> @@ -615,19 +614,7 @@ static int virtio_pci_sriov_configure(struct >>> pci_dev *pci_dev, int num_vfs) >>> if (!__virtio_test_bit(vdev, VIRTIO_F_SR_IOV)) >>> return -EINVAL; >>> - if (pci_vfs_assigned(pci_dev)) >>> - return -EPERM; >>> - >>> - if (num_vfs == 0) { >>> - pci_disable_sriov(pci_dev); >>> - return 0; >>> - } >>> - >>> - ret = pci_enable_sriov(pci_dev, num_vfs); >>> - if (ret < 0) >>> - return ret; >>> - >>> - return num_vfs; >>> + return pci_sriov_configure_simple(pci_dev, num_vfs); >>> } >>> static struct pci_driver virtio_pci_driver = { >>> -- >>> 2.18.1
On Wed, Oct 12, 2022 at 5:01 AM Max Gurtovoy <mgurtovoy@nvidia.com> wrote: > > > On 10/12/2022 11:42 AM, Max Gurtovoy wrote: > > > > On 10/12/2022 8:02 AM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > >> On Thu, Sep 29, 2022 at 02:40:08AM +0300, Max Gurtovoy wrote: > >>> This is instead of re-writing the same logic in virtio driver. > >>> > >>> Signed-off-by: Max Gurtovoy <mgurtovoy@nvidia.com> > >> Dropped this as it caused build failures: > >> > >> https://lore.kernel.org/r/202210080424.gSmuYfb0-lkp%40intel.com > > > > maybe you can re-run it with: > > > > diff --git a/drivers/virtio/Makefile b/drivers/virtio/Makefile > > index 8e98d24917cc..b383326a20e2 100644 > > --- a/drivers/virtio/Makefile > > +++ b/drivers/virtio/Makefile > > @@ -5,10 +5,11 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_VIRTIO_PCI_LIB) += virtio_pci_modern_dev.o > > obj-$(CONFIG_VIRTIO_PCI_LIB_LEGACY) += virtio_pci_legacy_dev.o > > obj-$(CONFIG_VIRTIO_MMIO) += virtio_mmio.o > > obj-$(CONFIG_VIRTIO_PCI) += virtio_pci.o > > -virtio_pci-y := virtio_pci_modern.o virtio_pci_common.o > > -virtio_pci-$(CONFIG_VIRTIO_PCI_LEGACY) += virtio_pci_legacy.o > > obj-$(CONFIG_VIRTIO_BALLOON) += virtio_balloon.o > > obj-$(CONFIG_VIRTIO_INPUT) += virtio_input.o > > obj-$(CONFIG_VIRTIO_VDPA) += virtio_vdpa.o > > obj-$(CONFIG_VIRTIO_MEM) += virtio_mem.o > > obj-$(CONFIG_VIRTIO_DMA_SHARED_BUFFER) += virtio_dma_buf.o > > + > > +virtio_pci-$(CONFIG_VIRTIO_PCI) := virtio_pci_modern.o > > virtio_pci_common.o > > +virtio_pci-$(CONFIG_VIRTIO_PCI_LEGACY) += virtio_pci_legacy.o > > > > Now I saw that CONFIG_PCI_IOV is not set in the error log so the bellow > should fix it: > > diff --git a/include/linux/pci.h b/include/linux/pci.h > index 060af91bafcd..c519220e8ff8 100644 > --- a/include/linux/pci.h > +++ b/include/linux/pci.h > @@ -2228,7 +2228,10 @@ static inline int pci_sriov_set_totalvfs(struct > pci_dev *dev, u16 numvfs) > { return 0; } > static inline int pci_sriov_get_totalvfs(struct pci_dev *dev) > { return 0; } > -#define pci_sriov_configure_simple NULL > +static inline int pci_sriov_configure_simple(struct pci_dev *dev, int > nr_virtfn) > +{ > + return -ENOSYS; > +} > static inline resource_size_t pci_iov_resource_size(struct pci_dev > *dev, int resno) > { return 0; } > static inline void pci_vf_drivers_autoprobe(struct pci_dev *dev, bool > probe) { } > > Bjorn, > > WDYT about the above ? > > should I send it to the pci subsystem list ? Yes. I don't apply things that haven't appeared on linux-pci@vger.kernel.org.
On 10/13/2022 12:20 AM, Bjorn Helgaas wrote: > On Wed, Oct 12, 2022 at 5:01 AM Max Gurtovoy <mgurtovoy@nvidia.com> wrote: >> >> On 10/12/2022 11:42 AM, Max Gurtovoy wrote: >>> On 10/12/2022 8:02 AM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: >>>> On Thu, Sep 29, 2022 at 02:40:08AM +0300, Max Gurtovoy wrote: >>>>> This is instead of re-writing the same logic in virtio driver. >>>>> >>>>> Signed-off-by: Max Gurtovoy <mgurtovoy@nvidia.com> >>>> Dropped this as it caused build failures: >>>> >>>> https://lore.kernel.org/r/202210080424.gSmuYfb0-lkp%40intel.com >>> maybe you can re-run it with: >>> >>> diff --git a/drivers/virtio/Makefile b/drivers/virtio/Makefile >>> index 8e98d24917cc..b383326a20e2 100644 >>> --- a/drivers/virtio/Makefile >>> +++ b/drivers/virtio/Makefile >>> @@ -5,10 +5,11 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_VIRTIO_PCI_LIB) += virtio_pci_modern_dev.o >>> obj-$(CONFIG_VIRTIO_PCI_LIB_LEGACY) += virtio_pci_legacy_dev.o >>> obj-$(CONFIG_VIRTIO_MMIO) += virtio_mmio.o >>> obj-$(CONFIG_VIRTIO_PCI) += virtio_pci.o >>> -virtio_pci-y := virtio_pci_modern.o virtio_pci_common.o >>> -virtio_pci-$(CONFIG_VIRTIO_PCI_LEGACY) += virtio_pci_legacy.o >>> obj-$(CONFIG_VIRTIO_BALLOON) += virtio_balloon.o >>> obj-$(CONFIG_VIRTIO_INPUT) += virtio_input.o >>> obj-$(CONFIG_VIRTIO_VDPA) += virtio_vdpa.o >>> obj-$(CONFIG_VIRTIO_MEM) += virtio_mem.o >>> obj-$(CONFIG_VIRTIO_DMA_SHARED_BUFFER) += virtio_dma_buf.o >>> + >>> +virtio_pci-$(CONFIG_VIRTIO_PCI) := virtio_pci_modern.o >>> virtio_pci_common.o >>> +virtio_pci-$(CONFIG_VIRTIO_PCI_LEGACY) += virtio_pci_legacy.o >>> >> Now I saw that CONFIG_PCI_IOV is not set in the error log so the bellow >> should fix it: >> >> diff --git a/include/linux/pci.h b/include/linux/pci.h >> index 060af91bafcd..c519220e8ff8 100644 >> --- a/include/linux/pci.h >> +++ b/include/linux/pci.h >> @@ -2228,7 +2228,10 @@ static inline int pci_sriov_set_totalvfs(struct >> pci_dev *dev, u16 numvfs) >> { return 0; } >> static inline int pci_sriov_get_totalvfs(struct pci_dev *dev) >> { return 0; } >> -#define pci_sriov_configure_simple NULL >> +static inline int pci_sriov_configure_simple(struct pci_dev *dev, int >> nr_virtfn) >> +{ >> + return -ENOSYS; >> +} >> static inline resource_size_t pci_iov_resource_size(struct pci_dev >> *dev, int resno) >> { return 0; } >> static inline void pci_vf_drivers_autoprobe(struct pci_dev *dev, bool >> probe) { } >> >> Bjorn, >> >> WDYT about the above ? >> >> should I send it to the pci subsystem list ? > Yes. I don't apply things that haven't appeared on linux-pci@vger.kernel.org. Sure. MST, can you confirm the above fixes the build errors before I sent the v2 ?
On Thu, Oct 13, 2022 at 02:01:04AM +0300, Max Gurtovoy wrote: > > On 10/13/2022 12:20 AM, Bjorn Helgaas wrote: > > On Wed, Oct 12, 2022 at 5:01 AM Max Gurtovoy <mgurtovoy@nvidia.com> wrote: > > > > > > On 10/12/2022 11:42 AM, Max Gurtovoy wrote: > > > > On 10/12/2022 8:02 AM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > > > > > On Thu, Sep 29, 2022 at 02:40:08AM +0300, Max Gurtovoy wrote: > > > > > > This is instead of re-writing the same logic in virtio driver. > > > > > > > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Max Gurtovoy <mgurtovoy@nvidia.com> > > > > > Dropped this as it caused build failures: > > > > > > > > > > https://lore.kernel.org/r/202210080424.gSmuYfb0-lkp%40intel.com > > > > maybe you can re-run it with: > > > > > > > > diff --git a/drivers/virtio/Makefile b/drivers/virtio/Makefile > > > > index 8e98d24917cc..b383326a20e2 100644 > > > > --- a/drivers/virtio/Makefile > > > > +++ b/drivers/virtio/Makefile > > > > @@ -5,10 +5,11 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_VIRTIO_PCI_LIB) += virtio_pci_modern_dev.o > > > > obj-$(CONFIG_VIRTIO_PCI_LIB_LEGACY) += virtio_pci_legacy_dev.o > > > > obj-$(CONFIG_VIRTIO_MMIO) += virtio_mmio.o > > > > obj-$(CONFIG_VIRTIO_PCI) += virtio_pci.o > > > > -virtio_pci-y := virtio_pci_modern.o virtio_pci_common.o > > > > -virtio_pci-$(CONFIG_VIRTIO_PCI_LEGACY) += virtio_pci_legacy.o > > > > obj-$(CONFIG_VIRTIO_BALLOON) += virtio_balloon.o > > > > obj-$(CONFIG_VIRTIO_INPUT) += virtio_input.o > > > > obj-$(CONFIG_VIRTIO_VDPA) += virtio_vdpa.o > > > > obj-$(CONFIG_VIRTIO_MEM) += virtio_mem.o > > > > obj-$(CONFIG_VIRTIO_DMA_SHARED_BUFFER) += virtio_dma_buf.o > > > > + > > > > +virtio_pci-$(CONFIG_VIRTIO_PCI) := virtio_pci_modern.o > > > > virtio_pci_common.o > > > > +virtio_pci-$(CONFIG_VIRTIO_PCI_LEGACY) += virtio_pci_legacy.o > > > > > > > Now I saw that CONFIG_PCI_IOV is not set in the error log so the bellow > > > should fix it: > > > > > > diff --git a/include/linux/pci.h b/include/linux/pci.h > > > index 060af91bafcd..c519220e8ff8 100644 > > > --- a/include/linux/pci.h > > > +++ b/include/linux/pci.h > > > @@ -2228,7 +2228,10 @@ static inline int pci_sriov_set_totalvfs(struct > > > pci_dev *dev, u16 numvfs) > > > { return 0; } > > > static inline int pci_sriov_get_totalvfs(struct pci_dev *dev) > > > { return 0; } > > > -#define pci_sriov_configure_simple NULL > > > +static inline int pci_sriov_configure_simple(struct pci_dev *dev, int > > > nr_virtfn) > > > +{ > > > + return -ENOSYS; > > > +} > > > static inline resource_size_t pci_iov_resource_size(struct pci_dev > > > *dev, int resno) > > > { return 0; } > > > static inline void pci_vf_drivers_autoprobe(struct pci_dev *dev, bool > > > probe) { } > > > > > > Bjorn, > > > > > > WDYT about the above ? > > > > > > should I send it to the pci subsystem list ? > > Yes. I don't apply things that haven't appeared on linux-pci@vger.kernel.org. > > Sure. > > MST, > > can you confirm the above fixes the build errors before I sent the v2 ? Max, please just use the lkp test, it's not hard.
diff --git a/drivers/virtio/virtio_pci_common.c b/drivers/virtio/virtio_pci_common.c index ad258a9d3b9f..67d3970e57f2 100644 --- a/drivers/virtio/virtio_pci_common.c +++ b/drivers/virtio/virtio_pci_common.c @@ -607,7 +607,6 @@ static int virtio_pci_sriov_configure(struct pci_dev *pci_dev, int num_vfs) { struct virtio_pci_device *vp_dev = pci_get_drvdata(pci_dev); struct virtio_device *vdev = &vp_dev->vdev; - int ret; if (!(vdev->config->get_status(vdev) & VIRTIO_CONFIG_S_DRIVER_OK)) return -EBUSY; @@ -615,19 +614,7 @@ static int virtio_pci_sriov_configure(struct pci_dev *pci_dev, int num_vfs) if (!__virtio_test_bit(vdev, VIRTIO_F_SR_IOV)) return -EINVAL; - if (pci_vfs_assigned(pci_dev)) - return -EPERM; - - if (num_vfs == 0) { - pci_disable_sriov(pci_dev); - return 0; - } - - ret = pci_enable_sriov(pci_dev, num_vfs); - if (ret < 0) - return ret; - - return num_vfs; + return pci_sriov_configure_simple(pci_dev, num_vfs); } static struct pci_driver virtio_pci_driver = {
This is instead of re-writing the same logic in virtio driver. Signed-off-by: Max Gurtovoy <mgurtovoy@nvidia.com> --- drivers/virtio/virtio_pci_common.c | 15 +-------------- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 14 deletions(-)