Message ID | 20221010023859.11896-2-shikemeng@huawei.com (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
State | New, archived |
Headers | show |
Series | A few cleanup patches for blk-cgroup | expand |
On Mon, Oct 10, 2022 at 10:38:56AM +0800, Kemeng Shi wrote: > Function blk_ioprio_init only alloc blkg_policy_data which will be freed > in blkg_destroy_all, so no blk_ioprio_exit is called when blk_throtl_init > is failed in blkcg_init_queue. Also blk_ioprio_exit is not called in > blkcg_exit_queue for the same reason. Just remove blk_ioprio_exit to > keep behavior consistent. This code looks very different in current mainline.
on 10/10/2022 3:37 PM, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > On Mon, Oct 10, 2022 at 10:38:56AM +0800, Kemeng Shi wrote: >> Function blk_ioprio_init only alloc blkg_policy_data which will be freed >> in blkg_destroy_all, so no blk_ioprio_exit is called when blk_throtl_init >> is failed in blkcg_init_queue. Also blk_ioprio_exit is not called in >> blkcg_exit_queue for the same reason. Just remove blk_ioprio_exit to >> keep behavior consistent. > > This code looks very different in current mainline. Thanks for review. I will remove this patch and make new patches based on mainline code.
diff --git a/block/blk-cgroup.c b/block/blk-cgroup.c index 869af9d72bcf..bc4dec705572 100644 --- a/block/blk-cgroup.c +++ b/block/blk-cgroup.c @@ -1302,7 +1302,6 @@ int blkcg_init_queue(struct request_queue *q) ret = blk_iolatency_init(q); if (ret) { blk_throtl_exit(q); - blk_ioprio_exit(q); goto err_destroy_all; }
Function blk_ioprio_init only alloc blkg_policy_data which will be freed in blkg_destroy_all, so no blk_ioprio_exit is called when blk_throtl_init is failed in blkcg_init_queue. Also blk_ioprio_exit is not called in blkcg_exit_queue for the same reason. Just remove blk_ioprio_exit to keep behavior consistent. Signed-off-by: Kemeng Shi <shikemeng@huawei.com> --- block/blk-cgroup.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)