@@ -1840,8 +1840,7 @@ static void bfq_bfqq_handle_idle_busy_switch(struct bfq_data *bfqd,
* to control its weight explicitly)
*/
in_burst = bfq_bfqq_in_large_burst(bfqq);
- soft_rt = bfqd->bfq_wr_max_softrt_rate > 0 &&
- !BFQQ_TOTALLY_SEEKY(bfqq) &&
+ soft_rt = !BFQQ_TOTALLY_SEEKY(bfqq) &&
!in_burst &&
time_is_before_jiffies(bfqq->soft_rt_next_start) &&
bfqq->dispatched == 0 &&
@@ -4350,8 +4349,7 @@ void bfq_bfqq_expire(struct bfq_data *bfqd,
if (bfqd->low_latency && bfqq->wr_coeff == 1)
bfqq->last_wr_start_finish = jiffies;
- if (bfqd->low_latency && bfqd->bfq_wr_max_softrt_rate > 0 &&
- RB_EMPTY_ROOT(&bfqq->sort_list)) {
+ if (bfqd->low_latency && RB_EMPTY_ROOT(&bfqq->sort_list)) {
/*
* If we get here, and there are no outstanding
* requests, then the request pattern is isochronous
bfqd->bfq_wr_max_softrt_rate is assigned with 7000 in bfq_init_queue and never changed. So we can remove bfqd->bfq_wr_max_softrt_rate > 0 check which is always true. Signed-off-by: Kemeng Shi <shikemeng@huawei.com> --- block/bfq-iosched.c | 6 ++---- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)