Message ID | 20221130132156.2836184-7-linan122@huawei.com (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
State | New, archived |
Headers | show |
Series | iocost bugfix | expand |
On Wed, Nov 30, 2022 at 09:21:53PM +0800, Li Nan wrote: > vrate_min is calculated by DIV64_U64_ROUND_UP, but vrate_max is calculated > by div64_u64. Vrate_min may be 1 greater than vrate_max if the input > values min and max of cost.qos are equal. > > Signed-off-by: Li Nan <linan122@huawei.com> > --- > block/blk-iocost.c | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/block/blk-iocost.c b/block/blk-iocost.c > index f4a754b9d10f..2316ba93e7d6 100644 > --- a/block/blk-iocost.c > +++ b/block/blk-iocost.c > @@ -926,7 +926,7 @@ static bool ioc_refresh_params(struct ioc *ioc, bool force) > > ioc->vrate_min = DIV64_U64_ROUND_UP((u64)ioc->params.qos[QOS_MIN] * > VTIME_PER_USEC, MILLION); > - ioc->vrate_max = div64_u64((u64)ioc->params.qos[QOS_MAX] * > + ioc->vrate_max = DIV64_U64_ROUND_UP((u64)ioc->params.qos[QOS_MAX] * > VTIME_PER_USEC, MILLION); Can you please align the parameters line? Other than that Acked-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org> Thanks.
diff --git a/block/blk-iocost.c b/block/blk-iocost.c index f4a754b9d10f..2316ba93e7d6 100644 --- a/block/blk-iocost.c +++ b/block/blk-iocost.c @@ -926,7 +926,7 @@ static bool ioc_refresh_params(struct ioc *ioc, bool force) ioc->vrate_min = DIV64_U64_ROUND_UP((u64)ioc->params.qos[QOS_MIN] * VTIME_PER_USEC, MILLION); - ioc->vrate_max = div64_u64((u64)ioc->params.qos[QOS_MAX] * + ioc->vrate_max = DIV64_U64_ROUND_UP((u64)ioc->params.qos[QOS_MAX] * VTIME_PER_USEC, MILLION); return true;
vrate_min is calculated by DIV64_U64_ROUND_UP, but vrate_max is calculated by div64_u64. Vrate_min may be 1 greater than vrate_max if the input values min and max of cost.qos are equal. Signed-off-by: Li Nan <linan122@huawei.com> --- block/blk-iocost.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)