diff mbox series

[linux-next] block: use strscpy() to instead of strncpy()

Message ID 202212031422587503771@zte.com.cn (mailing list archive)
State New, archived
Headers show
Series [linux-next] block: use strscpy() to instead of strncpy() | expand

Commit Message

Yang Yang Dec. 3, 2022, 6:22 a.m. UTC
From: Xu Panda <xu.panda@zte.com.cn>

The implementation of strscpy() is more robust and safer.
That's now the recommended way to copy NUL terminated strings.

Signed-off-by: Xu Panda <xu.panda@zte.com.cn>
Signed-off-by: Yang Yang <yang.yang29@zte.com>
---
 block/partitions/cmdline.c | 12 ++++--------
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

Comments

Justin Stitt Aug. 22, 2023, 11:31 p.m. UTC | #1
On Sat, Dec 03, 2022 at 02:22:58PM +0800, yang.yang29@zte.com.cn wrote:
> From: Xu Panda <xu.panda@zte.com.cn>
>
> The implementation of strscpy() is more robust and safer.
> That's now the recommended way to copy NUL terminated strings.
>
> Signed-off-by: Xu Panda <xu.panda@zte.com.cn>
> Signed-off-by: Yang Yang <yang.yang29@zte.com>
Reviewed-by: Justin Stitt <justinstitt@google.com>
Cc: linux-hardening@vger.kernel.org

> ---
>  block/partitions/cmdline.c | 12 ++++--------
>  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/block/partitions/cmdline.c b/block/partitions/cmdline.c
> index 1af610f0ba8c..c03bc105e575 100644
> --- a/block/partitions/cmdline.c
> +++ b/block/partitions/cmdline.c
> @@ -81,8 +81,7 @@ static int parse_subpart(struct cmdline_subpart **subpart, char *partdef)
>
>  		length = min_t(int, next - partdef,
>  			       sizeof(new_subpart->name) - 1);
> -		strncpy(new_subpart->name, partdef, length);
> -		new_subpart->name[length] = '\0';
> +		strscpy(new_subpart->name, partdef, length);
>
>  		partdef = ++next;
>  	} else
> @@ -140,8 +139,7 @@ static int parse_parts(struct cmdline_parts **parts, const char *bdevdef)
>  	}
>
>  	length = min_t(int, next - bdevdef, sizeof(newparts->name) - 1);
> -	strncpy(newparts->name, bdevdef, length);
> -	newparts->name[length] = '\0';
> +	strscpy(newparts->name, bdevdef, length);
>  	newparts->nr_subparts = 0;
>
>  	next_subpart = &newparts->subpart;
> @@ -153,8 +151,7 @@ static int parse_parts(struct cmdline_parts **parts, const char *bdevdef)
>  		length = (!next) ? (sizeof(buf) - 1) :
>  			min_t(int, next - bdevdef, sizeof(buf) - 1);
>
> -		strncpy(buf, bdevdef, length);
> -		buf[length] = '\0';
> +		strscpy(buf, bdevdef, length);
>
>  		ret = parse_subpart(next_subpart, buf);
>  		if (ret)
> @@ -267,8 +264,7 @@ static int add_part(int slot, struct cmdline_subpart *subpart,
>
>  	label_min = min_t(int, sizeof(info->volname) - 1,
>  			  sizeof(subpart->name));
> -	strncpy(info->volname, subpart->name, label_min);
> -	info->volname[label_min] = '\0';
> +	strscpy(info->volname, subpart->name, label_min);
>
>  	snprintf(tmp, sizeof(tmp), "(%s)", info->volname);
>  	strlcat(state->pp_buf, tmp, PAGE_SIZE);
> --
> 2.15.2
Jens Axboe Aug. 23, 2023, 12:08 a.m. UTC | #2
On Sat, 03 Dec 2022 14:22:58 +0800, yang.yang29@zte.com.cn wrote:
> The implementation of strscpy() is more robust and safer.
> That's now the recommended way to copy NUL terminated strings.
> 
> 

Applied, thanks!

[1/1] block: use strscpy() to instead of strncpy()
      commit: 146afeb235ccec10c17ad8ea26327c0c79dbd968

Best regards,
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/block/partitions/cmdline.c b/block/partitions/cmdline.c
index 1af610f0ba8c..c03bc105e575 100644
--- a/block/partitions/cmdline.c
+++ b/block/partitions/cmdline.c
@@ -81,8 +81,7 @@  static int parse_subpart(struct cmdline_subpart **subpart, char *partdef)

 		length = min_t(int, next - partdef,
 			       sizeof(new_subpart->name) - 1);
-		strncpy(new_subpart->name, partdef, length);
-		new_subpart->name[length] = '\0';
+		strscpy(new_subpart->name, partdef, length);

 		partdef = ++next;
 	} else
@@ -140,8 +139,7 @@  static int parse_parts(struct cmdline_parts **parts, const char *bdevdef)
 	}

 	length = min_t(int, next - bdevdef, sizeof(newparts->name) - 1);
-	strncpy(newparts->name, bdevdef, length);
-	newparts->name[length] = '\0';
+	strscpy(newparts->name, bdevdef, length);
 	newparts->nr_subparts = 0;

 	next_subpart = &newparts->subpart;
@@ -153,8 +151,7 @@  static int parse_parts(struct cmdline_parts **parts, const char *bdevdef)
 		length = (!next) ? (sizeof(buf) - 1) :
 			min_t(int, next - bdevdef, sizeof(buf) - 1);

-		strncpy(buf, bdevdef, length);
-		buf[length] = '\0';
+		strscpy(buf, bdevdef, length);

 		ret = parse_subpart(next_subpart, buf);
 		if (ret)
@@ -267,8 +264,7 @@  static int add_part(int slot, struct cmdline_subpart *subpart,

 	label_min = min_t(int, sizeof(info->volname) - 1,
 			  sizeof(subpart->name));
-	strncpy(info->volname, subpart->name, label_min);
-	info->volname[label_min] = '\0';
+	strscpy(info->volname, subpart->name, label_min);

 	snprintf(tmp, sizeof(tmp), "(%s)", info->volname);
 	strlcat(state->pp_buf, tmp, PAGE_SIZE);