From patchwork Fri Mar 24 17:56:48 2023 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Mike Snitzer X-Patchwork-Id: 13187156 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B86E5C6FD1C for ; Fri, 24 Mar 2023 18:00:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S232071AbjCXSAN (ORCPT ); Fri, 24 Mar 2023 14:00:13 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:32944 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S232427AbjCXR7x (ORCPT ); Fri, 24 Mar 2023 13:59:53 -0400 Received: from mail-qv1-f51.google.com (mail-qv1-f51.google.com [209.85.219.51]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4CD7223301 for ; Fri, 24 Mar 2023 10:58:18 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-qv1-f51.google.com with SMTP id x8so2102700qvr.9 for ; Fri, 24 Mar 2023 10:58:18 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; t=1679680622; h=content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:references:in-reply-to :message-id:date:subject:cc:to:from:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc :subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=pNKDXzqz05HkFrPteMNUMY0uT7UJYCgf272zyuZUZl4=; b=EDViqI/ERuR/bpBcTzv4RG2IbqAcItiSEH9H7CQv41uc2Xl/yEZA+flVSWolnFUhA1 +nm2PDa+bHe+ZW+Wz48DCp+RDGOUwk32sfUDt8eqh0L7V6t52YxCFDaalzkcyMruwSfK VN3ACc5M9k/csK4scjlo1Lk2SQg6dXf2+xL4Kk6hNAfs7VDaTbmlTRMxQJZLdUh6STq+ 7zwAmuWOkmTjsuKssPWjbbM5UVVE/j484FD8R5mPZdpVKMA4Lw3ILMTfCkvR22LdAYMK gVtkLRBF/0VN4ZB2fleMWQgTqALotlSvoevBtDUh3TZ8qk04SlaJR1u8lsFcIiN3Gejn +vLg== X-Gm-Message-State: AAQBX9chukU9IS6WEKFzJ/6IoZ4pinNP1ObPLfLaYKUN/HYic6/TjT1q EoRKf2AiVWmQGAX44WqtOiUv X-Google-Smtp-Source: AKy350bGhp7W2newRVTBbmoZx2qXXA2gpmXP36PQU0b4o9rStz5h1Py2BEuc4rkgXhilOeRw/2nEUg== X-Received: by 2002:a05:6214:1d2f:b0:5c2:3e10:53e4 with SMTP id f15-20020a0562141d2f00b005c23e1053e4mr6117499qvd.15.1679680621865; Fri, 24 Mar 2023 10:57:01 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (pool-68-160-166-30.bstnma.fios.verizon.net. [68.160.166.30]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id w16-20020a0cef90000000b005dd8b9345cfsm843233qvr.103.2023.03.24.10.57.01 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Fri, 24 Mar 2023 10:57:01 -0700 (PDT) From: Mike Snitzer To: dm-devel@redhat.com Cc: linux-block@vger.kernel.org, ejt@redhat.com, mpatocka@redhat.com, heinzm@redhat.com, nhuck@google.com, ebiggers@kernel.org, keescook@chromium.org, luomeng12@huawei.com, Mike Snitzer Subject: [dm-6.4 PATCH v2 1/9] dm bufio: remove unused dm_bufio_release_move interface Date: Fri, 24 Mar 2023 13:56:48 -0400 Message-Id: <20230324175656.85082-2-snitzer@kernel.org> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.40.0 In-Reply-To: <20230324175656.85082-1-snitzer@kernel.org> References: <20230324175656.85082-1-snitzer@kernel.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-block@vger.kernel.org From: Joe Thornber Was used by multi-snapshot DM target that never went upstream. Signed-off-by: Joe Thornber Acked-by: Mikulas Patocka Signed-off-by: Mike Snitzer --- drivers/md/dm-bufio.c | 77 ---------------------------------------- include/linux/dm-bufio.h | 6 ---- 2 files changed, 83 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/md/dm-bufio.c b/drivers/md/dm-bufio.c index cf077f9b30c3..79434b38f368 100644 --- a/drivers/md/dm-bufio.c +++ b/drivers/md/dm-bufio.c @@ -1415,83 +1415,6 @@ int dm_bufio_issue_discard(struct dm_bufio_client *c, sector_t block, sector_t c } EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(dm_bufio_issue_discard); -/* - * We first delete any other buffer that may be at that new location. - * - * Then, we write the buffer to the original location if it was dirty. - * - * Then, if we are the only one who is holding the buffer, relink the buffer - * in the buffer tree for the new location. - * - * If there was someone else holding the buffer, we write it to the new - * location but not relink it, because that other user needs to have the buffer - * at the same place. - */ -void dm_bufio_release_move(struct dm_buffer *b, sector_t new_block) -{ - struct dm_bufio_client *c = b->c; - struct dm_buffer *new; - - BUG_ON(dm_bufio_in_request()); - - dm_bufio_lock(c); - -retry: - new = __find(c, new_block); - if (new) { - if (new->hold_count) { - __wait_for_free_buffer(c); - goto retry; - } - - /* - * FIXME: Is there any point waiting for a write that's going - * to be overwritten in a bit? - */ - __make_buffer_clean(new); - __unlink_buffer(new); - __free_buffer_wake(new); - } - - BUG_ON(!b->hold_count); - BUG_ON(test_bit(B_READING, &b->state)); - - __write_dirty_buffer(b, NULL); - if (b->hold_count == 1) { - wait_on_bit_io(&b->state, B_WRITING, - TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE); - set_bit(B_DIRTY, &b->state); - b->dirty_start = 0; - b->dirty_end = c->block_size; - __unlink_buffer(b); - __link_buffer(b, new_block, LIST_DIRTY); - } else { - sector_t old_block; - - wait_on_bit_lock_io(&b->state, B_WRITING, - TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE); - /* - * Relink buffer to "new_block" so that write_callback - * sees "new_block" as a block number. - * After the write, link the buffer back to old_block. - * All this must be done in bufio lock, so that block number - * change isn't visible to other threads. - */ - old_block = b->block; - __unlink_buffer(b); - __link_buffer(b, new_block, b->list_mode); - submit_io(b, REQ_OP_WRITE, write_endio); - wait_on_bit_io(&b->state, B_WRITING, - TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE); - __unlink_buffer(b); - __link_buffer(b, old_block, b->list_mode); - } - - dm_bufio_unlock(c); - dm_bufio_release(b); -} -EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(dm_bufio_release_move); - static void forget_buffer_locked(struct dm_buffer *b) { if (likely(!b->hold_count) && likely(!smp_load_acquire(&b->state))) { diff --git a/include/linux/dm-bufio.h b/include/linux/dm-bufio.h index 2056743aaaaa..681656a1c03d 100644 --- a/include/linux/dm-bufio.h +++ b/include/linux/dm-bufio.h @@ -130,12 +130,6 @@ int dm_bufio_issue_flush(struct dm_bufio_client *c); */ int dm_bufio_issue_discard(struct dm_bufio_client *c, sector_t block, sector_t count); -/* - * Like dm_bufio_release but also move the buffer to the new - * block. dm_bufio_write_dirty_buffers is needed to commit the new block. - */ -void dm_bufio_release_move(struct dm_buffer *b, sector_t new_block); - /* * Free the given buffer. * This is just a hint, if the buffer is in use or dirty, this function