| Message ID | 20230801172201.1923299-4-hch@lst.de (mailing list archive) |
|---|---|
| State | New, archived |
| Headers | show |
| Series | [1/6] fs: remove emergency_thaw_bdev | expand |
On 8/1/23 19:21, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > Open code __generic_file_write_iter to remove the indirect call into > ->direct_IO and to prepare using the iomap based write code. > > Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> > --- > block/fops.c | 45 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-- > 1 file changed, 43 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > Reviewed-by: Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.de> Cheers, Hannes
On Tue, Aug 01, 2023 at 07:21:58PM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > Open code __generic_file_write_iter to remove the indirect call into > ->direct_IO and to prepare using the iomap based write code. > > Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Reviewed-by: Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@kernel.org> Luis
On Tue, Aug 01, 2023 at 07:21:58PM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > Open code __generic_file_write_iter to remove the indirect call into > ->direct_IO and to prepare using the iomap based write code. > > Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> > --- Reviewed-by: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>
Looks good,
Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com>
On Tue, Aug 01, 2023 at 07:21:58PM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > @@ -569,7 +594,23 @@ static ssize_t blkdev_write_iter(struct kiocb *iocb, struct iov_iter *from) > iov_iter_truncate(from, size); > } > > - ret = __generic_file_write_iter(iocb, from); > + ret = file_remove_privs(file); > + if (ret) > + return ret; That chunk is a bit of a WTF generator... Thankfully, static int __file_remove_privs(struct file *file, unsigned int flags) { struct dentry *dentry = file_dentry(file); struct inode *inode = file_inode(file); int error = 0; int kill; if (IS_NOSEC(inode) || !S_ISREG(inode->i_mode)) return 0; means that it's really a no-op. But I'd still suggest removing it, just to reduce the amount of head-scratching for people who'll be reading that code later...
On Tue, Aug 29, 2023 at 03:06:14AM +0100, Al Viro wrote: > On Tue, Aug 01, 2023 at 07:21:58PM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > > @@ -569,7 +594,23 @@ static ssize_t blkdev_write_iter(struct kiocb *iocb, struct iov_iter *from) > > iov_iter_truncate(from, size); > > } > > > > - ret = __generic_file_write_iter(iocb, from); > > + ret = file_remove_privs(file); > > + if (ret) > > + return ret; > > That chunk is a bit of a WTF generator... Thankfully, > > static int __file_remove_privs(struct file *file, unsigned int flags) > { > struct dentry *dentry = file_dentry(file); > struct inode *inode = file_inode(file); > int error = 0; > int kill; > > if (IS_NOSEC(inode) || !S_ISREG(inode->i_mode)) > return 0; > > means that it's really a no-op. But I'd still suggest > removing it, just to reduce the amount of head-scratching > for people who'll be reading that code later... I'll send an incremental patch to remove it once the changes hit Linus' tree.
diff --git a/block/fops.c b/block/fops.c index a286bf3325c5d8..8a05d99166e3bd 100644 --- a/block/fops.c +++ b/block/fops.c @@ -533,6 +533,30 @@ static int blkdev_release(struct inode *inode, struct file *filp) return 0; } +static ssize_t +blkdev_direct_write(struct kiocb *iocb, struct iov_iter *from) +{ + size_t count = iov_iter_count(from); + ssize_t written; + + written = kiocb_invalidate_pages(iocb, count); + if (written) { + if (written == -EBUSY) + return 0; + return written; + } + + written = blkdev_direct_IO(iocb, from); + if (written > 0) { + kiocb_invalidate_post_direct_write(iocb, count); + iocb->ki_pos += written; + count -= written; + } + if (written != -EIOCBQUEUED) + iov_iter_revert(from, count - iov_iter_count(from)); + return written; +} + /* * Write data to the block device. Only intended for the block device itself * and the raw driver which basically is a fake block device. @@ -542,7 +566,8 @@ static int blkdev_release(struct inode *inode, struct file *filp) */ static ssize_t blkdev_write_iter(struct kiocb *iocb, struct iov_iter *from) { - struct block_device *bdev = I_BDEV(iocb->ki_filp->f_mapping->host); + struct file *file = iocb->ki_filp; + struct block_device *bdev = I_BDEV(file->f_mapping->host); struct inode *bd_inode = bdev->bd_inode; loff_t size = bdev_nr_bytes(bdev); size_t shorted = 0; @@ -569,7 +594,23 @@ static ssize_t blkdev_write_iter(struct kiocb *iocb, struct iov_iter *from) iov_iter_truncate(from, size); } - ret = __generic_file_write_iter(iocb, from); + ret = file_remove_privs(file); + if (ret) + return ret; + + ret = file_update_time(file); + if (ret) + return ret; + + if (iocb->ki_flags & IOCB_DIRECT) { + ret = blkdev_direct_write(iocb, from); + if (ret >= 0 && iov_iter_count(from)) + ret = direct_write_fallback(iocb, from, ret, + generic_perform_write(iocb, from)); + } else { + ret = generic_perform_write(iocb, from); + } + if (ret > 0) ret = generic_write_sync(iocb, ret); iov_iter_reexpand(from, iov_iter_count(from) + shorted);
Open code __generic_file_write_iter to remove the indirect call into ->direct_IO and to prepare using the iomap based write code. Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> --- block/fops.c | 45 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-- 1 file changed, 43 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)