diff mbox series

[v9,03/17] block/mq-deadline: Only use zone locking if necessary

Message ID 20230816195447.3703954-4-bvanassche@acm.org (mailing list archive)
State New, archived
Headers show
Series Improve performance for zoned UFS devices | expand

Commit Message

Bart Van Assche Aug. 16, 2023, 7:53 p.m. UTC
Measurements have shown that limiting the queue depth to one per zone for
zoned writes has a significant negative performance impact on zoned UFS
devices. Hence this patch that disables zone locking by the mq-deadline
scheduler if the storage controller preserves the command order. This
patch is based on the following assumptions:
- It happens infrequently that zoned write requests are reordered by the
  block layer.
- The I/O priority of all write requests is the same per zone.
- Either no I/O scheduler is used or an I/O scheduler is used that
  serializes write requests per zone.

Cc: Damien Le Moal <dlemoal@kernel.org>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Cc: Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@acm.org>
---
 block/mq-deadline.c | 11 ++++++-----
 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

Comments

Damien Le Moal Aug. 17, 2023, 11:02 a.m. UTC | #1
On 8/17/23 04:53, Bart Van Assche wrote:
> Measurements have shown that limiting the queue depth to one per zone for
> zoned writes has a significant negative performance impact on zoned UFS
> devices. Hence this patch that disables zone locking by the mq-deadline
> scheduler if the storage controller preserves the command order. This
> patch is based on the following assumptions:
> - It happens infrequently that zoned write requests are reordered by the
>   block layer.
> - The I/O priority of all write requests is the same per zone.
> - Either no I/O scheduler is used or an I/O scheduler is used that
>   serializes write requests per zone.
> 
> Cc: Damien Le Moal <dlemoal@kernel.org>
> Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
> Cc: Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>
> Signed-off-by: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@acm.org>

Looks OK to me.

Reviewed-by: Damien Le Moal <dlemoal@kernel.org>
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/block/mq-deadline.c b/block/mq-deadline.c
index f958e79277b8..082ccf3186f4 100644
--- a/block/mq-deadline.c
+++ b/block/mq-deadline.c
@@ -353,7 +353,7 @@  deadline_fifo_request(struct deadline_data *dd, struct dd_per_prio *per_prio,
 		return NULL;
 
 	rq = rq_entry_fifo(per_prio->fifo_list[data_dir].next);
-	if (data_dir == DD_READ || !blk_queue_is_zoned(rq->q))
+	if (data_dir == DD_READ || !rq->q->limits.use_zone_write_lock)
 		return rq;
 
 	/*
@@ -398,7 +398,7 @@  deadline_next_request(struct deadline_data *dd, struct dd_per_prio *per_prio,
 	if (!rq)
 		return NULL;
 
-	if (data_dir == DD_READ || !blk_queue_is_zoned(rq->q))
+	if (data_dir == DD_READ || !rq->q->limits.use_zone_write_lock)
 		return rq;
 
 	/*
@@ -526,8 +526,9 @@  static struct request *__dd_dispatch_request(struct deadline_data *dd,
 	}
 
 	/*
-	 * For a zoned block device, if we only have writes queued and none of
-	 * them can be dispatched, rq will be NULL.
+	 * For a zoned block device that requires write serialization, if we
+	 * only have writes queued and none of them can be dispatched, rq will
+	 * be NULL.
 	 */
 	if (!rq)
 		return NULL;
@@ -934,7 +935,7 @@  static void dd_finish_request(struct request *rq)
 
 	atomic_inc(&per_prio->stats.completed);
 
-	if (blk_queue_is_zoned(q)) {
+	if (rq->q->limits.use_zone_write_lock) {
 		unsigned long flags;
 
 		spin_lock_irqsave(&dd->zone_lock, flags);