| Message ID | 20240117175901.871796-1-hch@lst.de (mailing list archive) |
|---|---|
| State | New, archived |
| Headers | show |
| Series | loop: fix the the direct I/O support check when used on top of block devices | expand |
On Wed, Jan 17, 2024 at 06:59:01PM +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > __loop_update_dio only checks the alignment requirement for block backed > file systems, but misses them for the case where the loop device is > created directly on top of another block device. Due to this creating > a loop device with default option plus the direct I/O flag on a > 512 byte > sector size file system will lead to incorrect I/O being submitted to the > lower block device and a lot of error from the lock layer. This can > be seen with xfstests generic/563. > > Fix the code in __loop_update_dio by factoring the alignment check into > a helper, and calling that also for the struct block_device of a block > device inode. > > Also remove the TODO comment talking about dynamically switching between > buffered and direct I/O, which is a would be a recipe for horrible > performance and occasional data loss. > > Fixes: 2e5ab5f379f9 ("block: loop: prepare for supporing direct IO") > Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Looks one nice cleanup & fix: Reviewed-by: Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com> Thanks, Ming
On Wed, 17 Jan 2024 18:59:01 +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > __loop_update_dio only checks the alignment requirement for block backed > file systems, but misses them for the case where the loop device is > created directly on top of another block device. Due to this creating > a loop device with default option plus the direct I/O flag on a > 512 byte > sector size file system will lead to incorrect I/O being submitted to the > lower block device and a lot of error from the lock layer. This can > be seen with xfstests generic/563. > > [...] Applied, thanks! [1/1] loop: fix the the direct I/O support check when used on top of block devices commit: baa7d536077dcdfe2b70c476a8873d1745d3de0f Best regards,
diff --git a/drivers/block/loop.c b/drivers/block/loop.c index 2bd10f3bfcb296..01bb9436240484 100644 --- a/drivers/block/loop.c +++ b/drivers/block/loop.c @@ -165,39 +165,37 @@ static loff_t get_loop_size(struct loop_device *lo, struct file *file) return get_size(lo->lo_offset, lo->lo_sizelimit, file); } +/* + * We support direct I/O only if lo_offset is aligned with the logical I/O size + * of backing device, and the logical block size of loop is bigger than that of + * the backing device. + */ +static bool lo_bdev_can_use_dio(struct loop_device *lo, + struct block_device *backing_bdev) +{ + unsigned short sb_bsize = bdev_logical_block_size(backing_bdev); + + if (queue_logical_block_size(lo->lo_queue) < sb_bsize) + return false; + if (lo->lo_offset & (sb_bsize - 1)) + return false; + return true; +} + static void __loop_update_dio(struct loop_device *lo, bool dio) { struct file *file = lo->lo_backing_file; - struct address_space *mapping = file->f_mapping; - struct inode *inode = mapping->host; - unsigned short sb_bsize = 0; - unsigned dio_align = 0; + struct inode *inode = file->f_mapping->host; + struct block_device *backing_bdev = NULL; bool use_dio; - if (inode->i_sb->s_bdev) { - sb_bsize = bdev_logical_block_size(inode->i_sb->s_bdev); - dio_align = sb_bsize - 1; - } + if (S_ISBLK(inode->i_mode)) + backing_bdev = I_BDEV(inode); + else if (inode->i_sb->s_bdev) + backing_bdev = inode->i_sb->s_bdev; - /* - * We support direct I/O only if lo_offset is aligned with the - * logical I/O size of backing device, and the logical block - * size of loop is bigger than the backing device's. - * - * TODO: the above condition may be loosed in the future, and - * direct I/O may be switched runtime at that time because most - * of requests in sane applications should be PAGE_SIZE aligned - */ - if (dio) { - if (queue_logical_block_size(lo->lo_queue) >= sb_bsize && - !(lo->lo_offset & dio_align) && - (file->f_mode & FMODE_CAN_ODIRECT)) - use_dio = true; - else - use_dio = false; - } else { - use_dio = false; - } + use_dio = dio && (file->f_mode & FMODE_CAN_ODIRECT) && + (!backing_bdev || lo_bdev_can_use_dio(lo, backing_bdev)); if (lo->use_dio == use_dio) return;
__loop_update_dio only checks the alignment requirement for block backed file systems, but misses them for the case where the loop device is created directly on top of another block device. Due to this creating a loop device with default option plus the direct I/O flag on a > 512 byte sector size file system will lead to incorrect I/O being submitted to the lower block device and a lot of error from the lock layer. This can be seen with xfstests generic/563. Fix the code in __loop_update_dio by factoring the alignment check into a helper, and calling that also for the struct block_device of a block device inode. Also remove the TODO comment talking about dynamically switching between buffered and direct I/O, which is a would be a recipe for horrible performance and occasional data loss. Fixes: 2e5ab5f379f9 ("block: loop: prepare for supporing direct IO") Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> --- drivers/block/loop.c | 52 +++++++++++++++++++++----------------------- 1 file changed, 25 insertions(+), 27 deletions(-)