| Message ID | 20240514151854.13066-1-jlee@suse.com (mailing list archive) |
|---|---|
| State | New |
| Headers | show |
| Series | [v2] aoe: fix the potential use-after-free problem in more places | expand |
I suggest to reconsider the version identification in this patch subject once more. … > This patch makes the above functions do … Do you stumble still on wording challenges for improved change descriptions in your patches? https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/tree/Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst?h=v6.9#n94 … > --- > > v2: > - Improve patch description V3: ??? V4: ??? Would you like to include issue reporters in message recipient lists? Regards, Markus
Hi Markus, On Tue, May 14, 2024 at 05:34:57PM +0200, Markus Elfring wrote: > I suggest to reconsider the version identification in this patch subject > once more. > > > … > > This patch makes the above functions do … > > Do you stumble still on wording challenges for improved change descriptions > in your patches? > https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/tree/Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst?h=v6.9#n94 > > … > > --- > > > > v2: > > - Improve patch description > > V3: > ??? > > V4: > ??? > > Would you like to include issue reporters in message recipient lists? > > Regards, > Markus I will wait more suggestion for code side and send new version. Thanks a lot! Joey Lee
diff --git a/drivers/block/aoe/aoecmd.c b/drivers/block/aoe/aoecmd.c index cc9077b588d7..d1f4ddc57645 100644 --- a/drivers/block/aoe/aoecmd.c +++ b/drivers/block/aoe/aoecmd.c @@ -361,6 +361,7 @@ ata_rw_frameinit(struct frame *f) } ah->cmdstat = ATA_CMD_PIO_READ | writebit | extbit; + dev_hold(t->ifp->nd); skb->dev = t->ifp->nd; } @@ -401,6 +402,8 @@ aoecmd_ata_rw(struct aoedev *d) __skb_queue_head_init(&queue); __skb_queue_tail(&queue, skb); aoenet_xmit(&queue); + } else { + dev_put(f->t->ifp->nd); } return 1; } @@ -483,10 +486,13 @@ resend(struct aoedev *d, struct frame *f) memcpy(h->dst, t->addr, sizeof h->dst); memcpy(h->src, t->ifp->nd->dev_addr, sizeof h->src); + dev_hold(t->ifp->nd); skb->dev = t->ifp->nd; skb = skb_clone(skb, GFP_ATOMIC); - if (skb == NULL) + if (skb == NULL) { + dev_put(t->ifp->nd); return; + } f->sent = ktime_get(); __skb_queue_head_init(&queue); __skb_queue_tail(&queue, skb); @@ -617,6 +623,8 @@ probe(struct aoetgt *t) __skb_queue_head_init(&queue); __skb_queue_tail(&queue, skb); aoenet_xmit(&queue); + } else { + dev_put(f->t->ifp->nd); } } @@ -1395,6 +1403,7 @@ aoecmd_ata_id(struct aoedev *d) ah->cmdstat = ATA_CMD_ID_ATA; ah->lba3 = 0xa0; + dev_hold(t->ifp->nd); skb->dev = t->ifp->nd; d->rttavg = RTTAVG_INIT; @@ -1404,6 +1413,8 @@ aoecmd_ata_id(struct aoedev *d) skb = skb_clone(skb, GFP_ATOMIC); if (skb) f->sent = ktime_get(); + else + dev_put(t->ifp->nd); return skb; }
For fixing CVE-2023-6270, f98364e92662 ("aoe: fix the potential use-after-free problem in aoecmd_cfg_pkts") makes tx() do dev_put() instead of doing in aoecmd_cfg_pkts(). It avoids that the tx() runs into use-after-free. But Nicolai Stange found more places in aoe have potential use-after-free problem with tx(). e.g. revalidate(), aoecmd_ata_rw(), resend(), probe() and aoecmd_cfg_rsp(). Those functions also use aoenet_xmit() to push packet to tx queue. So they should also use dev_hold() to increase the refcnt of skb->dev. This patch makes the above functions do dev_put() when the skb_clone() returns NULL. Link: https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2023-6270 Fixes: f98364e92662 ("aoe: fix the potential use-after-free problem in aoecmd_cfg_pkts") Reported-by: Nicolai Stange <nstange@suse.com> Signed-off-by: Chun-Yi Lee <jlee@suse.com> --- v2: - Improve patch description - Improved wording - Add oneline summary of the commit f98364e92662 - Used curly brackets in the if-else blocks. drivers/block/aoe/aoecmd.c | 13 ++++++++++++- 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)