diff mbox series

[01/12] ubd: untagle discard vs write zeroes not support handling

Message ID 20240529050507.1392041-2-hch@lst.de (mailing list archive)
State New
Headers show
Series [01/12] ubd: untagle discard vs write zeroes not support handling | expand

Commit Message

Christoph Hellwig May 29, 2024, 5:04 a.m. UTC
Discard and Write Zeroes are different operation and implemented
by different fallocate opcodes for ubd.  If one fails the other one
can work and vice versa.

Split the code to disable the operations in ubd_handler to only
disable the operation that actually failed.

Fixes: 50109b5a03b4 ("um: Add support for DISCARD in the UBD Driver")
Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
---
 arch/um/drivers/ubd_kern.c | 11 ++++++++---
 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

Comments

Damien Le Moal May 29, 2024, 8 a.m. UTC | #1
On 5/29/24 14:04, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> Discard and Write Zeroes are different operation and implemented
> by different fallocate opcodes for ubd.  If one fails the other one
> can work and vice versa.
> 
> Split the code to disable the operations in ubd_handler to only
> disable the operation that actually failed.
> 
> Fixes: 50109b5a03b4 ("um: Add support for DISCARD in the UBD Driver")
> Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
> ---
>  arch/um/drivers/ubd_kern.c | 11 ++++++++---
>  1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/um/drivers/ubd_kern.c b/arch/um/drivers/ubd_kern.c
> index ef805eaa9e013d..a79a3b7c33a647 100644
> --- a/arch/um/drivers/ubd_kern.c
> +++ b/arch/um/drivers/ubd_kern.c
> @@ -471,9 +471,14 @@ static void ubd_handler(void)
>  		for (count = 0; count < n/sizeof(struct io_thread_req *); count++) {
>  			struct io_thread_req *io_req = (*irq_req_buffer)[count];
>  
> -			if ((io_req->error == BLK_STS_NOTSUPP) && (req_op(io_req->req) == REQ_OP_DISCARD)) {
> -				blk_queue_max_discard_sectors(io_req->req->q, 0);
> -				blk_queue_max_write_zeroes_sectors(io_req->req->q, 0);
> +			if (io_req->error == BLK_STS_NOTSUPP) {
> +				struct request_queue *q = io_req->req->q;
> +
> +				if (req_op(io_req->req) == REQ_OP_DISCARD)
> +					blk_queue_max_discard_sectors(q, 0);
> +				if (req_op(io_req->req) == REQ_OP_WRITE_ZEROES)

Nit: this can be an "else if".

Otherwise, looks OK to me.

Reviewed-by: Damien Le Moal <dlemoal@kernel.org>

> +					blk_queue_max_write_zeroes_sectors(q,
> +							0);
>  			}
>  			blk_mq_end_request(io_req->req, io_req->error);
>  			kfree(io_req);
Bart Van Assche May 30, 2024, 7:44 p.m. UTC | #2
On 5/28/24 22:04, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> Discard and Write Zeroes are different operation and implemented
> by different fallocate opcodes for ubd.  If one fails the other one
> can work and vice versa.
> 
> Split the code to disable the operations in ubd_handler to only
> disable the operation that actually failed.

Reviewed-by: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@acm.org>
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/arch/um/drivers/ubd_kern.c b/arch/um/drivers/ubd_kern.c
index ef805eaa9e013d..a79a3b7c33a647 100644
--- a/arch/um/drivers/ubd_kern.c
+++ b/arch/um/drivers/ubd_kern.c
@@ -471,9 +471,14 @@  static void ubd_handler(void)
 		for (count = 0; count < n/sizeof(struct io_thread_req *); count++) {
 			struct io_thread_req *io_req = (*irq_req_buffer)[count];
 
-			if ((io_req->error == BLK_STS_NOTSUPP) && (req_op(io_req->req) == REQ_OP_DISCARD)) {
-				blk_queue_max_discard_sectors(io_req->req->q, 0);
-				blk_queue_max_write_zeroes_sectors(io_req->req->q, 0);
+			if (io_req->error == BLK_STS_NOTSUPP) {
+				struct request_queue *q = io_req->req->q;
+
+				if (req_op(io_req->req) == REQ_OP_DISCARD)
+					blk_queue_max_discard_sectors(q, 0);
+				if (req_op(io_req->req) == REQ_OP_WRITE_ZEROES)
+					blk_queue_max_write_zeroes_sectors(q,
+							0);
 			}
 			blk_mq_end_request(io_req->req, io_req->error);
 			kfree(io_req);