Message ID | d96b45ef44f240db39d985661ba306eb7bde77d0.1669391142.git.nickyc975@zju.edu.cn (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
State | New, archived |
Headers | show |
Series | random improvements and cleanups for elevator.c | expand |
On Fri, Nov 25, 2022 at 11:53:13PM +0800, Jinlong Chen wrote: > The "pointer + offset" pattern is more resonable. Looks good: Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
diff --git a/block/elevator.c b/block/elevator.c index ffa750976d25..93dbaa560b67 100644 --- a/block/elevator.c +++ b/block/elevator.c @@ -783,7 +783,7 @@ ssize_t elv_iosched_show(struct request_queue *q, char *name) } spin_unlock(&elv_list_lock); - len += sprintf(len+name, "\n"); + len += sprintf(name+len, "\n"); return len; }
The "pointer + offset" pattern is more resonable. Signed-off-by: Jinlong Chen <nickyc975@zju.edu.cn> --- block/elevator.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)