Message ID | 20190705072651.25150-1-wqu@suse.com (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
Headers | show |
Series | btrfs-progs: tests: Make 64K page size system happier | expand |
On Fri, Jul 05, 2019 at 03:26:46PM +0800, Qu Wenruo wrote: > Since I got another rockpro64, finally I could do some tests with > aarch64 64K page size mode. (The first board is working as a NAS for > a while) > > Unsurprisingly there are several false test alerts in btrfs-progs > selftests. > > Although there is no existing CI service based on 64K page sized system, > we'd better support for 64K page size as it's easier and easier to get > SBC with good enough aarch64 SoC to compile kernel/btrfs-progs and run > various tests on them. > > The first patch fix a bug which mkfs can't accept any sector size on 64K > page size system. > > The remaining patches enhance test cases to make them work on 64K page > size system (skip those tests unless kernel support subpage sized sector > size) > > Qu Wenruo (5): > btrfs-progs: mkfs: Apply the sectorsize user specified on 64k page > size system > btrfs-progs: fsck-tests: Check if current kernel can mount fs with > specified sector size > btrfs-progs: mkfs-tests: Skip 010-minimal-size if we can't mount with > 4k sector size > btrfs-progs: misc-tests: Make test cases work or skipped on 64K page > size system > btrfs-progs: convert-tests: Skip tests if kernel doesn't support > subpage sized sector size The fix is ok, but the test updates and pre-checks do not seem right to me. The check_preerq helpers are for binaries and rather simple checks unlike what the mkfs/mount test for 4k sectors does. I'll reply under the patches with more specific comments.