mbox series

[0/5] btrfs-progs: tests: Make 64K page size system happier

Message ID 20190705072651.25150-1-wqu@suse.com (mailing list archive)
Headers show
Series btrfs-progs: tests: Make 64K page size system happier | expand

Message

Qu Wenruo July 5, 2019, 7:26 a.m. UTC
Since I got another rockpro64, finally I could do some tests with
aarch64 64K page size mode. (The first board is working as a NAS for
a while)

Unsurprisingly there are several false test alerts in btrfs-progs
selftests.

Although there is no existing CI service based on 64K page sized system,
we'd better support for 64K page size as it's easier and easier to get
SBC with good enough aarch64 SoC to compile kernel/btrfs-progs and run
various tests on them.

The first patch fix a bug which mkfs can't accept any sector size on 64K
page size system.

The remaining patches enhance test cases to make them work on 64K page
size system (skip those tests unless kernel support subpage sized sector
size)

Qu Wenruo (5):
  btrfs-progs: mkfs: Apply the sectorsize user specified on 64k page
    size system
  btrfs-progs: fsck-tests: Check if current kernel can mount fs with
    specified sector size
  btrfs-progs: mkfs-tests: Skip 010-minimal-size if we can't mount with
    4k sector size
  btrfs-progs: misc-tests: Make test cases work or skipped on 64K page
    size system
  btrfs-progs: convert-tests: Skip tests if kernel doesn't support
    subpage sized sector size

 mkfs/main.c                                   | 12 +++++-
 tests/common                                  | 29 +++++++++++++
 tests/convert-tests/001-ext2-basic/test.sh    |  1 +
 tests/convert-tests/002-ext3-basic/test.sh    |  1 +
 tests/convert-tests/003-ext4-basic/test.sh    |  1 +
 .../004-ext2-backup-superblock-ranges/test.sh |  1 +
 .../005-delete-all-rollback/test.sh           |  1 +
 .../006-large-hole-extent/test.sh             |  2 +
 .../convert-tests/008-readonly-image/test.sh  |  1 +
 .../009-common-inode-flags/test.sh            |  1 +
 .../convert-tests/010-reiserfs-basic/test.sh  |  2 +
 .../011-reiserfs-delete-all-rollback/test.sh  |  1 +
 .../012-reiserfs-large-hole-extent/test.sh    |  1 +
 .../013-reiserfs-common-inode-flags/test.sh   |  1 +
 .../014-reiserfs-tail-handling/test.sh        |  1 +
 .../015-no-rollback-after-balance/test.sh     |  1 +
 .../016-invalid-large-inline-extent/test.sh   |  1 +
 tests/fsck-tests/012-leaf-corruption/test.sh  |  1 +
 .../028-unaligned-super-dev-sizes/test.sh     |  1 +
 .../037-freespacetree-repair/test.sh          |  3 +-
 .../010-convert-delete-ext2-subvol/test.sh    |  5 ++-
 tests/mkfs-tests/010-minimal-size/test.sh     | 41 ++++++++++---------
 22 files changed, 86 insertions(+), 23 deletions(-)

Comments

David Sterba July 22, 2019, 4:49 p.m. UTC | #1
On Fri, Jul 05, 2019 at 03:26:46PM +0800, Qu Wenruo wrote:
> Since I got another rockpro64, finally I could do some tests with
> aarch64 64K page size mode. (The first board is working as a NAS for
> a while)
> 
> Unsurprisingly there are several false test alerts in btrfs-progs
> selftests.
> 
> Although there is no existing CI service based on 64K page sized system,
> we'd better support for 64K page size as it's easier and easier to get
> SBC with good enough aarch64 SoC to compile kernel/btrfs-progs and run
> various tests on them.
> 
> The first patch fix a bug which mkfs can't accept any sector size on 64K
> page size system.
> 
> The remaining patches enhance test cases to make them work on 64K page
> size system (skip those tests unless kernel support subpage sized sector
> size)
> 
> Qu Wenruo (5):
>   btrfs-progs: mkfs: Apply the sectorsize user specified on 64k page
>     size system
>   btrfs-progs: fsck-tests: Check if current kernel can mount fs with
>     specified sector size
>   btrfs-progs: mkfs-tests: Skip 010-minimal-size if we can't mount with
>     4k sector size
>   btrfs-progs: misc-tests: Make test cases work or skipped on 64K page
>     size system
>   btrfs-progs: convert-tests: Skip tests if kernel doesn't support
>     subpage sized sector size

The fix is ok, but the test updates and pre-checks do not seem right to
me. The check_preerq helpers are for binaries and rather simple checks
unlike what the mkfs/mount test for 4k sectors does. I'll reply under
the patches with more specific comments.