Message ID | cover.1603745723.git.josef@toxicpanda.com (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
Headers | show |
Series | Some block rsv fixes | expand |
On Mon, Oct 26, 2020 at 04:57:25PM -0400, Josef Bacik wrote: > v1->v2: > - change the logic to max(1, root level), as generally we do not walk down into > level 0 for the merge, with the exception for root level == 0. > > --- Original email --- > > Hello, > > Nikolay has noticed that -o enospc_debug was getting some warnings in > btrfs_use_block_rsv() on some tests. I dug into them and one class is easy to > fix as it's a straight regression. The other one is going to require some more > debugging, so in the meantime here's the two patches I have so far that can be > merged. The first is just to make my life easier when debugging these problems, > and the second is the actual regression fix. It should probably be tagged for > stable as well since the regression was backported to stable. Thanks, Yeah, for stable 5.4+. > Josef > > Josef Bacik (2): > btrfs: print the block rsv type when we fail our reservation > btrfs: fix min reserved size calculation in merge_reloc_root Added to misc-next, thanks.