[RESEND,v2,0/3] cleanup btrfs_find_device and fix sysbot warning

Message

Anand Jain Nov. 3, 2020, 5:49 a.m. UTC

Patch 1 and 2 are cleanups. They were sent before with the cover-letter
as below.
 [PATCH RESEND 0/2] fix verify_one_dev_extent and btrfs_find_device

Patch 3 is a fix for the Warning reported by sysbot. This also was sent
before with the cover-letter titled as below.
  [PATCH 0/1] handle attacking device with devid=0

To avoid conflict fixes, please apply these patches in the order it is
sent here. But the sets are not related.

Both of these patchsets are at v2 at the latest. So I am marking all of
them as v2. The individual changes are in the patches.

Also earlier resend patches were threaded under its previous cover-letter
(though --in-reply-to was not used to generate/send those patches). So I am
trying to resend these patches again, hopefully, they are not threaded to
the older series again.

Anand Jain (3):
  btrfs: drop never met condition of disk_total_bytes == 0
  btrfs: fix btrfs_find_device unused arg seed
  btrfs: fix devid 0 without a replace item by failing the mount

 fs/btrfs/dev-replace.c | 30 ++++++++++++++---
 fs/btrfs/ioctl.c       |  4 +--
 fs/btrfs/scrub.c       |  4 +--
 fs/btrfs/volumes.c     | 73 ++++++++++++++++--------------------------
 fs/btrfs/volumes.h     |  2 +-
 5 files changed, 58 insertions(+), 55 deletions(-)

Comments

David Sterba Nov. 11, 2020, 3:51 p.m. UTC | #1

On Tue, Nov 03, 2020 at 01:49:41PM +0800, Anand Jain wrote:
> Patch 1 and 2 are cleanups. They were sent before with the cover-letter
> as below.
>  [PATCH RESEND 0/2] fix verify_one_dev_extent and btrfs_find_device
> 
> Patch 3 is a fix for the Warning reported by sysbot. This also was sent
> before with the cover-letter titled as below.
>   [PATCH 0/1] handle attacking device with devid=0
> 
> To avoid conflict fixes, please apply these patches in the order it is
> sent here. But the sets are not related.
> 
> Both of these patchsets are at v2 at the latest. So I am marking all of
> them as v2. The individual changes are in the patches.
> 
> Also earlier resend patches were threaded under its previous cover-letter
> (though --in-reply-to was not used to generate/send those patches). So I am
> trying to resend these patches again, hopefully, they are not threaded to
> the older series again.
> 
> Anand Jain (3):
>   btrfs: drop never met condition of disk_total_bytes == 0
>   btrfs: fix btrfs_find_device unused arg seed
>   btrfs: fix devid 0 without a replace item by failing the mount

Now added to misc-next, thanks.