@@ -1561,6 +1561,15 @@ static int __reserve_bytes(struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info,
flush == BTRFS_RESERVE_FLUSH_DATA) {
list_add_tail(&ticket.list, &space_info->tickets);
if (!space_info->flush) {
+ /*
+ * We were forced to add a reserve ticket, so
+ * our preemptive flushing is unable to keep
+ * up. Clamp down on the threshold for the
+ * preemptive flushing in order to keep up with
+ * the workload.
+ */
+ maybe_clamp_preempt(fs_info, space_info);
+
space_info->flush = 1;
trace_btrfs_trigger_flush(fs_info,
space_info->flags,
@@ -1572,14 +1581,6 @@ static int __reserve_bytes(struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info,
list_add_tail(&ticket.list,
&space_info->priority_tickets);
}
-
- /*
- * We were forced to add a reserve ticket, so our preemptive
- * flushing is unable to keep up. Clamp down on the threshold
- * for the preemptive flushing in order to keep up with the
- * workload.
- */
- maybe_clamp_preempt(fs_info, space_info);
} else if (!ret && space_info->flags & BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_METADATA) {
used += orig_bytes;
/*
We were clamping the threshold for preemptive reclaim any time we added a ticket to wait on, which if we have a lot of threads means we'd essentially max out the clamp the first time we start to flush. Instead of doing this, simply do it every time we have to start flushing, this will make us ramp up gradually instead of going to max clamping as soon as we start needing to do flushing. Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com> --- fs/btrfs/space-info.c | 17 +++++++++-------- 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)