@@ -257,7 +257,8 @@ static int exclude_super_stripes(struct btrfs_root *root,
cache->bytes_super += stripe_len;
ret = add_excluded_extent(root, cache->key.objectid,
stripe_len);
- BUG_ON(ret); /* -ENOMEM */
+ if (ret)
+ return ret;
}
for (i = 0; i < BTRFS_SUPER_MIRROR_MAX; i++) {
@@ -265,13 +266,17 @@ static int exclude_super_stripes(struct btrfs_root *root,
ret = btrfs_rmap_block(&root->fs_info->mapping_tree,
cache->key.objectid, bytenr,
0, &logical, &nr, &stripe_len);
- BUG_ON(ret); /* -ENOMEM */
+ if (ret)
+ return ret;
while (nr--) {
cache->bytes_super += stripe_len;
ret = add_excluded_extent(root, logical[nr],
stripe_len);
- BUG_ON(ret); /* -ENOMEM */
+ if (ret) {
+ kfree(logical);
+ return ret;
+ }
}
kfree(logical);
@@ -8120,7 +8125,17 @@ int btrfs_read_block_groups(struct btrfs_root *root)
* info has super bytes accounted for, otherwise we'll think
* we have more space than we actually do.
*/
- exclude_super_stripes(root, cache);
+ ret = exclude_super_stripes(root, cache);
+ if (ret) {
+ /*
+ * We may have excluded something, so call this just in
+ * case.
+ */
+ free_excluded_extents(root, cache);
+ kfree(cache->free_space_ctl);
+ kfree(cache);
+ goto error;
+ }
/*
* check for two cases, either we are full, and therefore
@@ -8262,7 +8277,17 @@ int btrfs_make_block_group(struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans,
cache->last_byte_to_unpin = (u64)-1;
cache->cached = BTRFS_CACHE_FINISHED;
- exclude_super_stripes(root, cache);
+ ret = exclude_super_stripes(root, cache);
+ if (ret) {
+ /*
+ * We may have excluded something, so call this just in
+ * case.
+ */
+ free_excluded_extents(root, cache);
+ kfree(cache->free_space_ctl);
+ kfree(cache);
+ return ret;
+ }
add_new_free_space(cache, root->fs_info, chunk_offset,
chunk_offset + size);
@@ -4935,7 +4935,18 @@ int btrfs_rmap_block(struct btrfs_mapping_tree *map_tree,
em = lookup_extent_mapping(em_tree, chunk_start, 1);
read_unlock(&em_tree->lock);
- BUG_ON(!em || em->start != chunk_start);
+ if (!em) {
+ printk(KERN_ERR "btrfs: couldn't find em for chunk %Lu\n",
+ chunk_start);
+ return -EIO;
+ }
+
+ if (em->start != chunk_start) {
+ printk(KERN_ERR "btrfs: bad chunk start, em=%Lu, wanted=%Lu\n",
+ em->start, chunk_start);
+ free_extent_map(em);
+ return -EIO;
+ }
map = (struct map_lookup *)em->bdev;
length = em->len;
If you restore a btrfs-image file system and try to mount that file system we'll panic. That's because btrfs-image restores and just makes one big chunk to envelope the whole disk, since they are really only meant to be messed with by our btrfs-progs. So fix up btrfs_rmap_block and the callers of it for mount so that we no longer panic but instead just return an error and fail to mount. Thanks, Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com> --- fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c | 35 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----- fs/btrfs/volumes.c | 13 ++++++++++++- 2 files changed, 42 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)