Message ID | 1373057014-1424-1-git-send-email-fdmanana@gmail.com (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
State | Accepted, archived |
Headers | show |
On Fri, Jul 05, 2013 at 09:43:34PM +0100, Filipe David Borba Manana wrote: > In btrfs_set_block_flags() we want to check if the slot > in the leaf points to the first item in the leaf - if it > doesn't check if the previous item in the leaf is an extent > item. By removing this extra slot decrement we are indeed > checking the item right before the slot, and not the second > item before. > > V2: Added Josef Bacik's review mention. Please don't do that. It's ok to increase version if you update code or changelog/subject, but not just the tags. thanks, david -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Ok, sorry. I'm not used to git send-email and related best practices. Thanks for letting me know. On Mon, Jul 8, 2013 at 5:14 PM, David Sterba <dsterba@suse.cz> wrote: > On Fri, Jul 05, 2013 at 09:43:34PM +0100, Filipe David Borba Manana wrote: >> In btrfs_set_block_flags() we want to check if the slot >> in the leaf points to the first item in the leaf - if it >> doesn't check if the previous item in the leaf is an extent >> item. By removing this extra slot decrement we are indeed >> checking the item right before the slot, and not the second >> item before. >> >> V2: Added Josef Bacik's review mention. > > Please don't do that. It's ok to increase version if you update code or > changelog/subject, but not just the tags. > > thanks, > david
diff --git a/extent-tree.c b/extent-tree.c index f597e16..e04160b 100644 --- a/extent-tree.c +++ b/extent-tree.c @@ -1596,7 +1596,7 @@ again: if (ret > 0 && skinny_metadata) { skinny_metadata = 0; - if (path->slots[0]--) { + if (path->slots[0]) { path->slots[0]--; btrfs_item_key_to_cpu(path->nodes[0], &key, path->slots[0]);