@@ -8181,18 +8181,24 @@ out_notrans:
static void btrfs_run_delalloc_work(struct btrfs_work *work)
{
struct btrfs_delalloc_work *delalloc_work;
+ struct inode *inode;
delalloc_work = container_of(work, struct btrfs_delalloc_work,
work);
- if (delalloc_work->wait)
- btrfs_wait_ordered_range(delalloc_work->inode, 0, (u64)-1);
- else
- filemap_flush(delalloc_work->inode->i_mapping);
+ inode = delalloc_work->inode;
+ if (delalloc_work->wait) {
+ btrfs_wait_ordered_range(inode, 0, (u64)-1);
+ } else {
+ filemap_flush(inode->i_mapping);
+ if (test_bit(BTRFS_INODE_HAS_ASYNC_EXTENT,
+ &BTRFS_I(inode)->runtime_flags))
+ filemap_flush(inode->i_mapping);
+ }
if (delalloc_work->delay_iput)
- btrfs_add_delayed_iput(delalloc_work->inode);
+ btrfs_add_delayed_iput(inode);
else
- iput(delalloc_work->inode);
+ iput(inode);
complete(&delalloc_work->completion);
}
When using delalloc workers in a non-waiting way (like for enospc handling) we can end up not actually waiting for the dirty pages to be started if we have compression. We need to add an extra filemap flush to make sure any async extents that have started are actually moved along before returning. Thanks, Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com> --- fs/btrfs/inode.c | 18 ++++++++++++------ 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)