| Message ID | 1427042775-8258-1-git-send-email-broonie@kernel.org (mailing list archive) |
|---|---|
| State | New, archived |
| Headers | show |
On Sun, Mar 22, 2015 at 04:46:15PM +0000, Mark Brown wrote: > The btrfs inode.c relies on implicit inclusion of linux/uio.h for > definitions of struct iov_iter and iov_iter_alignment() which breaks the > current ARM allmodconfig build where that implicit inclusion does not > happen. Add an explicit include to fix that. > > Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org> Acked-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.cz> -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
diff --git a/fs/btrfs/inode.c b/fs/btrfs/inode.c index 37dc84c..9e4a634 100644 --- a/fs/btrfs/inode.c +++ b/fs/btrfs/inode.c @@ -29,6 +29,7 @@ #include <linux/backing-dev.h> #include <linux/mpage.h> #include <linux/swap.h> +#include <linux/uio.h> #include <linux/writeback.h> #include <linux/statfs.h> #include <linux/compat.h>
The btrfs inode.c relies on implicit inclusion of linux/uio.h for definitions of struct iov_iter and iov_iter_alignment() which breaks the current ARM allmodconfig build where that implicit inclusion does not happen. Add an explicit include to fix that. Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org> --- fs/btrfs/inode.c | 1 + 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)