====>btrfs_truncate_inode_items()
======>btrfs_ordered_update_i_size(inode, last_size, NULL);
Here btrfs_ordered_update_i_size()'s offset argument is last_size.
And below test case can reveal this bug:
dd if=/dev/zero of=fs.img bs=$((1024*1024)) count=100
dev=$(losetup --show -f fs.img)
mkdir -p /mnt/mntpoint
mkfs.btrfs -f $dev
mount $dev /mnt/mntpoint
cd /mnt/mntpoint
echo "workdir is: /mnt/mntpoint"
blocksize=$((128 * 1024))
dd if=/dev/zero of=testfile bs=$blocksize count=1
sync
count=$((17*1024*1024*1024/blocksize))
echo "file size is:" $((count*blocksize))
for ((i = 1; i <= $count; i++)); do
i=$((i + 1))
dst_offset=$((blocksize * i))
xfs_io -f -c "reflink testfile 0 $dst_offset $blocksize"\
testfile > /dev/null
done
sync
truncate --size 0 testfile
ls -l testfile
du -sh testfile
exit
In this case, truncate operation will fail for enospc reason and
"du -sh testfile" returns value greater than 0, but testfile's
size is 0, we need to reflect correct inode->i_size.
Signed-off-by: Wang Xiaoguang <wangxg.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>
---
fs/btrfs/ordered-data.c | 3 ++-
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
@@ -968,6 +968,7 @@ int btrfs_ordered_update_i_size(struct inode *inode, u64 offset,
struct rb_node *prev = NULL;
struct btrfs_ordered_extent *test;
int ret = 1;
+ u64 orig_offset = offset;
spin_lock_irq(&tree->lock);
if (ordered) {
@@ -983,7 +984,7 @@ int btrfs_ordered_update_i_size(struct inode *inode, u64 offset,
/* truncate file */
if (disk_i_size > i_size) {
- BTRFS_I(inode)->disk_i_size = i_size;
+ BTRFS_I(inode)->disk_i_size = orig_offset;
ret = 0;
goto out;
}