| Message ID | 1505287939-14106-5-git-send-email-allen.lkml@gmail.com (mailing list archive) |
|---|---|
| State | New, archived |
| Headers | show |
On Wed, Sep 13, 2017 at 01:02:14PM +0530, Allen Pais wrote: > Signed-off-by: Allen Pais <allen.lkml@gmail.com> Hi Allen Although correct, if you look higher up the call chain, this appears to be not so useful. rlb_initialize() is only called by bond_alb_initialize(), and it propagates the -1. That is only called by bond_open() with: if (bond_alb_initialize(bond, (BOND_MODE(bond) == BOND_MODE_ALB))) return -ENOMEM; So you might want to also modify this code, to return the return value, rather than use the hard coded ENOMEM. Since you code is OK as far as it goes: Reviewed-by: Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch> Andrew -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> propagates the -1. That is only called by bond_open() with: > > if (bond_alb_initialize(bond, (BOND_MODE(bond) == BOND_MODE_ALB))) > return -ENOMEM; > > So you might want to also modify this code, to return the return > value, rather than use the hard coded ENOMEM. > I'll modify the above and send it out a separate patch. Thank you. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
diff --git a/drivers/net/bonding/bond_alb.c b/drivers/net/bonding/bond_alb.c index c02cc81..89df377 100644 --- a/drivers/net/bonding/bond_alb.c +++ b/drivers/net/bonding/bond_alb.c @@ -864,7 +864,7 @@ static int rlb_initialize(struct bonding *bond) new_hashtbl = kmalloc(size, GFP_KERNEL); if (!new_hashtbl) - return -1; + return -ENOMEM; spin_lock_bh(&bond->mode_lock);
Signed-off-by: Allen Pais <allen.lkml@gmail.com> --- drivers/net/bonding/bond_alb.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)