@@ -53,8 +53,8 @@
static const struct extent_io_ops btree_extent_io_ops;
static void end_workqueue_fn(struct btrfs_work *work);
static void btrfs_destroy_ordered_extents(struct btrfs_root *root);
-static int btrfs_destroy_delayed_refs(struct btrfs_transaction *trans,
- struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info);
+static void btrfs_destroy_delayed_refs(struct btrfs_transaction *trans,
+ struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info);
static void btrfs_destroy_delalloc_inodes(struct btrfs_root *root);
static int btrfs_destroy_marked_extents(struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info,
struct extent_io_tree *dirty_pages,
@@ -4186,13 +4186,12 @@ static void btrfs_destroy_all_ordered_extents(struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info)
spin_unlock(&fs_info->ordered_root_lock);
}
-static int btrfs_destroy_delayed_refs(struct btrfs_transaction *trans,
- struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info)
+static void btrfs_destroy_delayed_refs(struct btrfs_transaction *trans,
+ struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info)
{
struct rb_node *node;
struct btrfs_delayed_ref_root *delayed_refs;
struct btrfs_delayed_ref_node *ref;
- int ret = 0;
delayed_refs = &trans->delayed_refs;
@@ -4200,7 +4199,7 @@ static int btrfs_destroy_delayed_refs(struct btrfs_transaction *trans,
if (atomic_read(&delayed_refs->num_entries) == 0) {
spin_unlock(&delayed_refs->lock);
btrfs_info(fs_info, "delayed_refs has NO entry");
- return ret;
+ return;
}
while ((node = rb_first(&delayed_refs->href_root)) != NULL) {
@@ -4254,8 +4253,6 @@ static int btrfs_destroy_delayed_refs(struct btrfs_transaction *trans,
}
spin_unlock(&delayed_refs->lock);
-
- return ret;
}
static void btrfs_destroy_delalloc_inodes(struct btrfs_root *root)
btrfs_destroy_delayed_refs defines the variable "ret" for return value, but it is not modified after initialization. Further, I find that any of the callees do not handle the return value. So it is safe to drop the unneeded value "ret". Signed-off-by: zhong jiang <zhongjiang@huawei.com> --- fs/btrfs/disk-io.c | 13 +++++-------- 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)